Cargando…

Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether computer-based learning (CBL) improves newly acquired knowledge and is an effective strategy for teaching prenatal ultrasound diagnostic skills to third-year medical students when compared with instruction by traditional paper-based methods (PBM). STUDY DESIGN: We cond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amesse, Lawrence S., Callendar, Ealena, Pfaff-Amesse, Teresa, Duke, Janice, Herbert, William N.P.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Education Online 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20165541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3885/meo.2008.Res00275
_version_ 1782174416868737024
author Amesse, Lawrence S.
Callendar, Ealena
Pfaff-Amesse, Teresa
Duke, Janice
Herbert, William N.P.
author_facet Amesse, Lawrence S.
Callendar, Ealena
Pfaff-Amesse, Teresa
Duke, Janice
Herbert, William N.P.
author_sort Amesse, Lawrence S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether computer-based learning (CBL) improves newly acquired knowledge and is an effective strategy for teaching prenatal ultrasound diagnostic skills to third-year medical students when compared with instruction by traditional paper-based methods (PBM). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, prospective study involving volunteer junior (3(rd) year) medical students consecutively rotating through the Obstetrics and Gynecology clerkship during six months of the 2005–2006 academic year. The students were randomly assigned to permuted blocks and divided into two groups. Half of the participants received instruction in prenatal ultrasound diagnostics using an interactive CBL program; the other half received instruction using equivalent material by the traditional PBM. Outcomes were evaluated by comparing changes in pre-tutorial and post instruction examination scores. RESULTS: All 36 potential participants (100%) completed the study curriculum. Students were divided equally between the CBL (n = 18) and PBM (n = 18) groups. Pre-tutorial exam scores (mean±s.d.) were 44%±11.1% for the CBL group and 44%±10.8% for the PBL cohort, indicating no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups. After instruction, post-tutorial exam scores (mean±s.d.) were increased from the pre-tutorial scores, 74%±11% and 67%±12%, for students in the CBL and the PBM groups, respectively. The improvement in post-tutorial exam scores from the pre-test scores was considered significant (p<0.05). When post-test scores for the tutorial groups were compared, the CBL subjects achieved a score that was, on average, 7 percentage points higher than their PBM counterparts, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Instruction by either CBL or PBM strategies is associated with improvements in newly acquired knowledge as reflected by increased post-tutorial examination scores. Students that received CBL had significantlyhigher post-tutorial exam scores than those in the PBM group, indicating that CBL is an effective instruction strategy in this setting.
format Text
id pubmed-2779600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Medical Education Online
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27796002010-01-14 Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills Amesse, Lawrence S. Callendar, Ealena Pfaff-Amesse, Teresa Duke, Janice Herbert, William N.P. Med Educ Online Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether computer-based learning (CBL) improves newly acquired knowledge and is an effective strategy for teaching prenatal ultrasound diagnostic skills to third-year medical students when compared with instruction by traditional paper-based methods (PBM). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, prospective study involving volunteer junior (3(rd) year) medical students consecutively rotating through the Obstetrics and Gynecology clerkship during six months of the 2005–2006 academic year. The students were randomly assigned to permuted blocks and divided into two groups. Half of the participants received instruction in prenatal ultrasound diagnostics using an interactive CBL program; the other half received instruction using equivalent material by the traditional PBM. Outcomes were evaluated by comparing changes in pre-tutorial and post instruction examination scores. RESULTS: All 36 potential participants (100%) completed the study curriculum. Students were divided equally between the CBL (n = 18) and PBM (n = 18) groups. Pre-tutorial exam scores (mean±s.d.) were 44%±11.1% for the CBL group and 44%±10.8% for the PBL cohort, indicating no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups. After instruction, post-tutorial exam scores (mean±s.d.) were increased from the pre-tutorial scores, 74%±11% and 67%±12%, for students in the CBL and the PBM groups, respectively. The improvement in post-tutorial exam scores from the pre-test scores was considered significant (p<0.05). When post-test scores for the tutorial groups were compared, the CBL subjects achieved a score that was, on average, 7 percentage points higher than their PBM counterparts, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Instruction by either CBL or PBM strategies is associated with improvements in newly acquired knowledge as reflected by increased post-tutorial examination scores. Students that received CBL had significantlyhigher post-tutorial exam scores than those in the PBM group, indicating that CBL is an effective instruction strategy in this setting. Medical Education Online 2008-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2779600/ /pubmed/20165541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3885/meo.2008.Res00275 Text en © 2008 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Material in Medical Education Online is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Amesse, Lawrence S.
Callendar, Ealena
Pfaff-Amesse, Teresa
Duke, Janice
Herbert, William N.P.
Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills
title Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills
title_full Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills
title_fullStr Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills
title_short Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills
title_sort evaluation of computer-aided strategies for teaching medical students prenatal ultrasound diagnostic skills
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20165541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3885/meo.2008.Res00275
work_keys_str_mv AT amesselawrences evaluationofcomputeraidedstrategiesforteachingmedicalstudentsprenatalultrasounddiagnosticskills
AT callendarealena evaluationofcomputeraidedstrategiesforteachingmedicalstudentsprenatalultrasounddiagnosticskills
AT pfaffamesseteresa evaluationofcomputeraidedstrategiesforteachingmedicalstudentsprenatalultrasounddiagnosticskills
AT dukejanice evaluationofcomputeraidedstrategiesforteachingmedicalstudentsprenatalultrasounddiagnosticskills
AT herbertwilliamnp evaluationofcomputeraidedstrategiesforteachingmedicalstudentsprenatalultrasounddiagnosticskills