Cargando…
Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether computer-based learning (CBL) improves newly acquired knowledge and is an effective strategy for teaching prenatal ultrasound diagnostic skills to third-year medical students when compared with instruction by traditional paper-based methods (PBM). STUDY DESIGN: We cond...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medical Education Online
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20165541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3885/meo.2008.Res00275 |
_version_ | 1782174416868737024 |
---|---|
author | Amesse, Lawrence S. Callendar, Ealena Pfaff-Amesse, Teresa Duke, Janice Herbert, William N.P. |
author_facet | Amesse, Lawrence S. Callendar, Ealena Pfaff-Amesse, Teresa Duke, Janice Herbert, William N.P. |
author_sort | Amesse, Lawrence S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether computer-based learning (CBL) improves newly acquired knowledge and is an effective strategy for teaching prenatal ultrasound diagnostic skills to third-year medical students when compared with instruction by traditional paper-based methods (PBM). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, prospective study involving volunteer junior (3(rd) year) medical students consecutively rotating through the Obstetrics and Gynecology clerkship during six months of the 2005–2006 academic year. The students were randomly assigned to permuted blocks and divided into two groups. Half of the participants received instruction in prenatal ultrasound diagnostics using an interactive CBL program; the other half received instruction using equivalent material by the traditional PBM. Outcomes were evaluated by comparing changes in pre-tutorial and post instruction examination scores. RESULTS: All 36 potential participants (100%) completed the study curriculum. Students were divided equally between the CBL (n = 18) and PBM (n = 18) groups. Pre-tutorial exam scores (mean±s.d.) were 44%±11.1% for the CBL group and 44%±10.8% for the PBL cohort, indicating no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups. After instruction, post-tutorial exam scores (mean±s.d.) were increased from the pre-tutorial scores, 74%±11% and 67%±12%, for students in the CBL and the PBM groups, respectively. The improvement in post-tutorial exam scores from the pre-test scores was considered significant (p<0.05). When post-test scores for the tutorial groups were compared, the CBL subjects achieved a score that was, on average, 7 percentage points higher than their PBM counterparts, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Instruction by either CBL or PBM strategies is associated with improvements in newly acquired knowledge as reflected by increased post-tutorial examination scores. Students that received CBL had significantlyhigher post-tutorial exam scores than those in the PBM group, indicating that CBL is an effective instruction strategy in this setting. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2779600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Medical Education Online |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27796002010-01-14 Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills Amesse, Lawrence S. Callendar, Ealena Pfaff-Amesse, Teresa Duke, Janice Herbert, William N.P. Med Educ Online Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether computer-based learning (CBL) improves newly acquired knowledge and is an effective strategy for teaching prenatal ultrasound diagnostic skills to third-year medical students when compared with instruction by traditional paper-based methods (PBM). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, prospective study involving volunteer junior (3(rd) year) medical students consecutively rotating through the Obstetrics and Gynecology clerkship during six months of the 2005–2006 academic year. The students were randomly assigned to permuted blocks and divided into two groups. Half of the participants received instruction in prenatal ultrasound diagnostics using an interactive CBL program; the other half received instruction using equivalent material by the traditional PBM. Outcomes were evaluated by comparing changes in pre-tutorial and post instruction examination scores. RESULTS: All 36 potential participants (100%) completed the study curriculum. Students were divided equally between the CBL (n = 18) and PBM (n = 18) groups. Pre-tutorial exam scores (mean±s.d.) were 44%±11.1% for the CBL group and 44%±10.8% for the PBL cohort, indicating no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups. After instruction, post-tutorial exam scores (mean±s.d.) were increased from the pre-tutorial scores, 74%±11% and 67%±12%, for students in the CBL and the PBM groups, respectively. The improvement in post-tutorial exam scores from the pre-test scores was considered significant (p<0.05). When post-test scores for the tutorial groups were compared, the CBL subjects achieved a score that was, on average, 7 percentage points higher than their PBM counterparts, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Instruction by either CBL or PBM strategies is associated with improvements in newly acquired knowledge as reflected by increased post-tutorial examination scores. Students that received CBL had significantlyhigher post-tutorial exam scores than those in the PBM group, indicating that CBL is an effective instruction strategy in this setting. Medical Education Online 2008-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2779600/ /pubmed/20165541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3885/meo.2008.Res00275 Text en © 2008 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Material in Medical Education Online is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Amesse, Lawrence S. Callendar, Ealena Pfaff-Amesse, Teresa Duke, Janice Herbert, William N.P. Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills |
title | Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills |
title_full | Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills |
title_short | Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills |
title_sort | evaluation of computer-aided strategies for teaching medical students prenatal ultrasound diagnostic skills |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20165541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3885/meo.2008.Res00275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amesselawrences evaluationofcomputeraidedstrategiesforteachingmedicalstudentsprenatalultrasounddiagnosticskills AT callendarealena evaluationofcomputeraidedstrategiesforteachingmedicalstudentsprenatalultrasounddiagnosticskills AT pfaffamesseteresa evaluationofcomputeraidedstrategiesforteachingmedicalstudentsprenatalultrasounddiagnosticskills AT dukejanice evaluationofcomputeraidedstrategiesforteachingmedicalstudentsprenatalultrasounddiagnosticskills AT herbertwilliamnp evaluationofcomputeraidedstrategiesforteachingmedicalstudentsprenatalultrasounddiagnosticskills |