Cargando…
An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
BACKGROUND: To assess the utility of haplotype association mapping (HAM) as a quantitative trait locus (QTL) discovery tool, we conducted HAM analyses for red blood cell count (RBC) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) in mice. We then experimentally tested each HAM QTL using published cro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-81 |
_version_ | 1782175581859741696 |
---|---|
author | Burgess-Herbert, Sarah L Tsaih, Shirng-Wern Stylianou, Ioannis M Walsh, Kenneth Cox, Allison J Paigen, Beverly |
author_facet | Burgess-Herbert, Sarah L Tsaih, Shirng-Wern Stylianou, Ioannis M Walsh, Kenneth Cox, Allison J Paigen, Beverly |
author_sort | Burgess-Herbert, Sarah L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To assess the utility of haplotype association mapping (HAM) as a quantitative trait locus (QTL) discovery tool, we conducted HAM analyses for red blood cell count (RBC) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) in mice. We then experimentally tested each HAM QTL using published crosses or new F2 intercrosses guided by the haplotype at the HAM peaks. RESULTS: The HAM for RBC, using 33 classic inbred lines, revealed 8 QTLs; 2 of these were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × CBA/J)F2 intercross we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 4 as false positives. The HAM for HDL, using 81 strains including recombinant inbred lines and chromosome substitution strains, detected 46 QTLs. Of these, 36 were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × A/J)F2 intercross that we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 8 as false positives. By testing each HAM QTL for RBC and HDL, we demonstrated that 78% of the 54 HAM peaks were true positives and 22% were false positives. Interestingly, all false positives were in significant allelic association with one or more real QTL. CONCLUSION: Because type I errors (false positives) can be detected experimentally, we conclude that HAM is useful for QTL detection and narrowing. We advocate the powerful and economical combined approach demonstrated here: the use of HAM for QTL discovery, followed by mitigation of the false positive problem by testing the HAM-predicted QTLs with small HAM-guided experimental crosses. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2797012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27970122009-12-23 An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice Burgess-Herbert, Sarah L Tsaih, Shirng-Wern Stylianou, Ioannis M Walsh, Kenneth Cox, Allison J Paigen, Beverly BMC Genet Research article BACKGROUND: To assess the utility of haplotype association mapping (HAM) as a quantitative trait locus (QTL) discovery tool, we conducted HAM analyses for red blood cell count (RBC) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) in mice. We then experimentally tested each HAM QTL using published crosses or new F2 intercrosses guided by the haplotype at the HAM peaks. RESULTS: The HAM for RBC, using 33 classic inbred lines, revealed 8 QTLs; 2 of these were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × CBA/J)F2 intercross we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 4 as false positives. The HAM for HDL, using 81 strains including recombinant inbred lines and chromosome substitution strains, detected 46 QTLs. Of these, 36 were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × A/J)F2 intercross that we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 8 as false positives. By testing each HAM QTL for RBC and HDL, we demonstrated that 78% of the 54 HAM peaks were true positives and 22% were false positives. Interestingly, all false positives were in significant allelic association with one or more real QTL. CONCLUSION: Because type I errors (false positives) can be detected experimentally, we conclude that HAM is useful for QTL detection and narrowing. We advocate the powerful and economical combined approach demonstrated here: the use of HAM for QTL discovery, followed by mitigation of the false positive problem by testing the HAM-predicted QTLs with small HAM-guided experimental crosses. BioMed Central 2009-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2797012/ /pubmed/20003225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-81 Text en Copyright ©2009 Burgess-Herbert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Burgess-Herbert, Sarah L Tsaih, Shirng-Wern Stylianou, Ioannis M Walsh, Kenneth Cox, Allison J Paigen, Beverly An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice |
title | An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice |
title_full | An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice |
title_fullStr | An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice |
title_full_unstemmed | An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice |
title_short | An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice |
title_sort | experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-81 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burgessherbertsarahl anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice AT tsaihshirngwern anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice AT stylianouioannism anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice AT walshkenneth anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice AT coxallisonj anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice AT paigenbeverly anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice AT burgessherbertsarahl experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice AT tsaihshirngwern experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice AT stylianouioannism experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice AT walshkenneth experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice AT coxallisonj experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice AT paigenbeverly experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice |