Cargando…

An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice

BACKGROUND: To assess the utility of haplotype association mapping (HAM) as a quantitative trait locus (QTL) discovery tool, we conducted HAM analyses for red blood cell count (RBC) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) in mice. We then experimentally tested each HAM QTL using published cro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burgess-Herbert, Sarah L, Tsaih, Shirng-Wern, Stylianou, Ioannis M, Walsh, Kenneth, Cox, Allison J, Paigen, Beverly
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-81
_version_ 1782175581859741696
author Burgess-Herbert, Sarah L
Tsaih, Shirng-Wern
Stylianou, Ioannis M
Walsh, Kenneth
Cox, Allison J
Paigen, Beverly
author_facet Burgess-Herbert, Sarah L
Tsaih, Shirng-Wern
Stylianou, Ioannis M
Walsh, Kenneth
Cox, Allison J
Paigen, Beverly
author_sort Burgess-Herbert, Sarah L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the utility of haplotype association mapping (HAM) as a quantitative trait locus (QTL) discovery tool, we conducted HAM analyses for red blood cell count (RBC) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) in mice. We then experimentally tested each HAM QTL using published crosses or new F2 intercrosses guided by the haplotype at the HAM peaks. RESULTS: The HAM for RBC, using 33 classic inbred lines, revealed 8 QTLs; 2 of these were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × CBA/J)F2 intercross we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 4 as false positives. The HAM for HDL, using 81 strains including recombinant inbred lines and chromosome substitution strains, detected 46 QTLs. Of these, 36 were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × A/J)F2 intercross that we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 8 as false positives. By testing each HAM QTL for RBC and HDL, we demonstrated that 78% of the 54 HAM peaks were true positives and 22% were false positives. Interestingly, all false positives were in significant allelic association with one or more real QTL. CONCLUSION: Because type I errors (false positives) can be detected experimentally, we conclude that HAM is useful for QTL detection and narrowing. We advocate the powerful and economical combined approach demonstrated here: the use of HAM for QTL discovery, followed by mitigation of the false positive problem by testing the HAM-predicted QTLs with small HAM-guided experimental crosses.
format Text
id pubmed-2797012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27970122009-12-23 An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice Burgess-Herbert, Sarah L Tsaih, Shirng-Wern Stylianou, Ioannis M Walsh, Kenneth Cox, Allison J Paigen, Beverly BMC Genet Research article BACKGROUND: To assess the utility of haplotype association mapping (HAM) as a quantitative trait locus (QTL) discovery tool, we conducted HAM analyses for red blood cell count (RBC) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) in mice. We then experimentally tested each HAM QTL using published crosses or new F2 intercrosses guided by the haplotype at the HAM peaks. RESULTS: The HAM for RBC, using 33 classic inbred lines, revealed 8 QTLs; 2 of these were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × CBA/J)F2 intercross we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 4 as false positives. The HAM for HDL, using 81 strains including recombinant inbred lines and chromosome substitution strains, detected 46 QTLs. Of these, 36 were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × A/J)F2 intercross that we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 8 as false positives. By testing each HAM QTL for RBC and HDL, we demonstrated that 78% of the 54 HAM peaks were true positives and 22% were false positives. Interestingly, all false positives were in significant allelic association with one or more real QTL. CONCLUSION: Because type I errors (false positives) can be detected experimentally, we conclude that HAM is useful for QTL detection and narrowing. We advocate the powerful and economical combined approach demonstrated here: the use of HAM for QTL discovery, followed by mitigation of the false positive problem by testing the HAM-predicted QTLs with small HAM-guided experimental crosses. BioMed Central 2009-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2797012/ /pubmed/20003225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-81 Text en Copyright ©2009 Burgess-Herbert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Burgess-Herbert, Sarah L
Tsaih, Shirng-Wern
Stylianou, Ioannis M
Walsh, Kenneth
Cox, Allison J
Paigen, Beverly
An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
title An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
title_full An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
title_fullStr An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
title_full_unstemmed An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
title_short An experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
title_sort experimental assessment of in silico haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-81
work_keys_str_mv AT burgessherbertsarahl anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT tsaihshirngwern anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT stylianouioannism anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT walshkenneth anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT coxallisonj anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT paigenbeverly anexperimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT burgessherbertsarahl experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT tsaihshirngwern experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT stylianouioannism experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT walshkenneth experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT coxallisonj experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT paigenbeverly experimentalassessmentofinsilicohaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice