Cargando…
Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide
PURPOSE: Oral temozolomide is approved in many countries for malignant glioma and for melanoma in some countries outside the USA. This study evaluated the exposure equivalence and safety of temozolomide by intravenous infusion and oral administration. METHODS: Subjects with primary central nervous s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2808524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19641919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1078-6 |
_version_ | 1782176497389273088 |
---|---|
author | Diez, Blanca D. Statkevich, Paul Zhu, Yali Abutarif, Malaz A. Xuan, Fengjuan Kantesaria, Bhavna Cutler, David Cantillon, Marc Schwarz, Max Pallotta, Maria Guadalupe Ottaviano, Fabio H. |
author_facet | Diez, Blanca D. Statkevich, Paul Zhu, Yali Abutarif, Malaz A. Xuan, Fengjuan Kantesaria, Bhavna Cutler, David Cantillon, Marc Schwarz, Max Pallotta, Maria Guadalupe Ottaviano, Fabio H. |
author_sort | Diez, Blanca D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Oral temozolomide is approved in many countries for malignant glioma and for melanoma in some countries outside the USA. This study evaluated the exposure equivalence and safety of temozolomide by intravenous infusion and oral administration. METHODS: Subjects with primary central nervous system malignancies (excluding central nervous system lymphoma) received 200 mg/m(2) of oral temozolomide on days 1, 2 and 5. On days 3 and 4, subjects received 150 mg/m(2) temozolomide either as a 90-min intravenous infusion on one day or by oral administration on an alternate day. RESULTS: Ratio of log-transformed means (intravenous:oral) of area under the concentration–time curve and maximum concentration of drug after dosing for temozolomide and 5-(3-methyltriazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC) met exposure equivalence criteria (90% confidence interval = 0.8–1.25). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with those reported previously in subjects with recurrent glioma treated with oral temozolomide, except for mostly mild and transient injection site reactions with intravenous administration. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an exposure equivalence of a 90-min intravenous infusion of temozolomide and an equivalent oral dose. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2808524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28085242010-01-22 Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide Diez, Blanca D. Statkevich, Paul Zhu, Yali Abutarif, Malaz A. Xuan, Fengjuan Kantesaria, Bhavna Cutler, David Cantillon, Marc Schwarz, Max Pallotta, Maria Guadalupe Ottaviano, Fabio H. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Original Article PURPOSE: Oral temozolomide is approved in many countries for malignant glioma and for melanoma in some countries outside the USA. This study evaluated the exposure equivalence and safety of temozolomide by intravenous infusion and oral administration. METHODS: Subjects with primary central nervous system malignancies (excluding central nervous system lymphoma) received 200 mg/m(2) of oral temozolomide on days 1, 2 and 5. On days 3 and 4, subjects received 150 mg/m(2) temozolomide either as a 90-min intravenous infusion on one day or by oral administration on an alternate day. RESULTS: Ratio of log-transformed means (intravenous:oral) of area under the concentration–time curve and maximum concentration of drug after dosing for temozolomide and 5-(3-methyltriazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC) met exposure equivalence criteria (90% confidence interval = 0.8–1.25). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with those reported previously in subjects with recurrent glioma treated with oral temozolomide, except for mostly mild and transient injection site reactions with intravenous administration. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an exposure equivalence of a 90-min intravenous infusion of temozolomide and an equivalent oral dose. Springer-Verlag 2009-07-30 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2808524/ /pubmed/19641919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1078-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Diez, Blanca D. Statkevich, Paul Zhu, Yali Abutarif, Malaz A. Xuan, Fengjuan Kantesaria, Bhavna Cutler, David Cantillon, Marc Schwarz, Max Pallotta, Maria Guadalupe Ottaviano, Fabio H. Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide |
title | Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide |
title_full | Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide |
title_short | Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide |
title_sort | evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2808524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19641919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1078-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diezblancad evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide AT statkevichpaul evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide AT zhuyali evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide AT abutarifmalaza evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide AT xuanfengjuan evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide AT kantesariabhavna evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide AT cutlerdavid evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide AT cantillonmarc evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide AT schwarzmax evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide AT pallottamariaguadalupe evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide AT ottavianofabioh evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide |