Cargando…

Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide

PURPOSE: Oral temozolomide is approved in many countries for malignant glioma and for melanoma in some countries outside the USA. This study evaluated the exposure equivalence and safety of temozolomide by intravenous infusion and oral administration. METHODS: Subjects with primary central nervous s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diez, Blanca D., Statkevich, Paul, Zhu, Yali, Abutarif, Malaz A., Xuan, Fengjuan, Kantesaria, Bhavna, Cutler, David, Cantillon, Marc, Schwarz, Max, Pallotta, Maria Guadalupe, Ottaviano, Fabio H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2808524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19641919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1078-6
_version_ 1782176497389273088
author Diez, Blanca D.
Statkevich, Paul
Zhu, Yali
Abutarif, Malaz A.
Xuan, Fengjuan
Kantesaria, Bhavna
Cutler, David
Cantillon, Marc
Schwarz, Max
Pallotta, Maria Guadalupe
Ottaviano, Fabio H.
author_facet Diez, Blanca D.
Statkevich, Paul
Zhu, Yali
Abutarif, Malaz A.
Xuan, Fengjuan
Kantesaria, Bhavna
Cutler, David
Cantillon, Marc
Schwarz, Max
Pallotta, Maria Guadalupe
Ottaviano, Fabio H.
author_sort Diez, Blanca D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Oral temozolomide is approved in many countries for malignant glioma and for melanoma in some countries outside the USA. This study evaluated the exposure equivalence and safety of temozolomide by intravenous infusion and oral administration. METHODS: Subjects with primary central nervous system malignancies (excluding central nervous system lymphoma) received 200 mg/m(2) of oral temozolomide on days 1, 2 and 5. On days 3 and 4, subjects received 150 mg/m(2) temozolomide either as a 90-min intravenous infusion on one day or by oral administration on an alternate day. RESULTS: Ratio of log-transformed means (intravenous:oral) of area under the concentration–time curve and maximum concentration of drug after dosing for temozolomide and 5-(3-methyltriazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC) met exposure equivalence criteria (90% confidence interval = 0.8–1.25). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with those reported previously in subjects with recurrent glioma treated with oral temozolomide, except for mostly mild and transient injection site reactions with intravenous administration. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an exposure equivalence of a 90-min intravenous infusion of temozolomide and an equivalent oral dose.
format Text
id pubmed-2808524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28085242010-01-22 Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide Diez, Blanca D. Statkevich, Paul Zhu, Yali Abutarif, Malaz A. Xuan, Fengjuan Kantesaria, Bhavna Cutler, David Cantillon, Marc Schwarz, Max Pallotta, Maria Guadalupe Ottaviano, Fabio H. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Original Article PURPOSE: Oral temozolomide is approved in many countries for malignant glioma and for melanoma in some countries outside the USA. This study evaluated the exposure equivalence and safety of temozolomide by intravenous infusion and oral administration. METHODS: Subjects with primary central nervous system malignancies (excluding central nervous system lymphoma) received 200 mg/m(2) of oral temozolomide on days 1, 2 and 5. On days 3 and 4, subjects received 150 mg/m(2) temozolomide either as a 90-min intravenous infusion on one day or by oral administration on an alternate day. RESULTS: Ratio of log-transformed means (intravenous:oral) of area under the concentration–time curve and maximum concentration of drug after dosing for temozolomide and 5-(3-methyltriazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC) met exposure equivalence criteria (90% confidence interval = 0.8–1.25). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with those reported previously in subjects with recurrent glioma treated with oral temozolomide, except for mostly mild and transient injection site reactions with intravenous administration. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an exposure equivalence of a 90-min intravenous infusion of temozolomide and an equivalent oral dose. Springer-Verlag 2009-07-30 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2808524/ /pubmed/19641919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1078-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Diez, Blanca D.
Statkevich, Paul
Zhu, Yali
Abutarif, Malaz A.
Xuan, Fengjuan
Kantesaria, Bhavna
Cutler, David
Cantillon, Marc
Schwarz, Max
Pallotta, Maria Guadalupe
Ottaviano, Fabio H.
Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide
title Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide
title_full Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide
title_fullStr Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide
title_short Evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide
title_sort evaluation of the exposure equivalence of oral versus intravenous temozolomide
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2808524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19641919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1078-6
work_keys_str_mv AT diezblancad evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide
AT statkevichpaul evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide
AT zhuyali evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide
AT abutarifmalaza evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide
AT xuanfengjuan evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide
AT kantesariabhavna evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide
AT cutlerdavid evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide
AT cantillonmarc evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide
AT schwarzmax evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide
AT pallottamariaguadalupe evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide
AT ottavianofabioh evaluationoftheexposureequivalenceoforalversusintravenoustemozolomide