Cargando…

General practitioners and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The Prescription Peer Academic Detailing (Rx-PAD) project is an educational intervention study aiming at improving GPs' competence in pharmacotherapy. GPs in CME peer groups were randomised to receive a tailored intervention, either to support a safer prescription practice for elder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frich, Jan C, Høye, Sigurd, Lindbæk, Morten, Straand, Jørund
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2828999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20152015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-12
_version_ 1782178056277852160
author Frich, Jan C
Høye, Sigurd
Lindbæk, Morten
Straand, Jørund
author_facet Frich, Jan C
Høye, Sigurd
Lindbæk, Morten
Straand, Jørund
author_sort Frich, Jan C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Prescription Peer Academic Detailing (Rx-PAD) project is an educational intervention study aiming at improving GPs' competence in pharmacotherapy. GPs in CME peer groups were randomised to receive a tailored intervention, either to support a safer prescription practice for elderly patients or to improve prescribing of antibiotics to patients with respiratory tract infections. The project was based on the principles of peer group academic detailing, incorporating individual feedback on GPs' prescription patterns. We did a study to explore GPs and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing, and to explore GPs' reasons for deviating from recommended prescribing practice. METHODS: Data was collected through nine focus group interviews with a total of 39 GPs and 20 tutors. Transcripts from the interviews were analyzed by two researchers according to a procedure for thematic content analysis. RESULTS: A shared understanding of the complex decision-making involved in prescribing in general practice was reported by both GPs and tutors as essential for an open discussion in the CME groups. Tutors experienced that CME groups differed regarding structure and atmosphere, and in some groups it was a challenge to run the scheme as planned. Individual feedback motivated GPs to reflect on and to improve their prescribing practice, though feedback reports could cause distress if the prescribing practice was unfavourable. Explanations for inappropriate prescriptions were lack of knowledge, factors associated with patients, the GP's background, the practice, and other health professionals or health care facilities. CONCLUSIONS: GPs and tutors experienced peer group academic detailing as a suitable method to discuss and learn more about pharmacotherapy. An important outcome for GPs was being more reflective about their prescriptions. Disclosure of inappropriate prescribing can cause distress in some doctors, and tutors must be prepared to recognise and manage such reactions.
format Text
id pubmed-2828999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28289992010-02-26 General practitioners and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing: a qualitative study Frich, Jan C Høye, Sigurd Lindbæk, Morten Straand, Jørund BMC Fam Pract Research article BACKGROUND: The Prescription Peer Academic Detailing (Rx-PAD) project is an educational intervention study aiming at improving GPs' competence in pharmacotherapy. GPs in CME peer groups were randomised to receive a tailored intervention, either to support a safer prescription practice for elderly patients or to improve prescribing of antibiotics to patients with respiratory tract infections. The project was based on the principles of peer group academic detailing, incorporating individual feedback on GPs' prescription patterns. We did a study to explore GPs and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing, and to explore GPs' reasons for deviating from recommended prescribing practice. METHODS: Data was collected through nine focus group interviews with a total of 39 GPs and 20 tutors. Transcripts from the interviews were analyzed by two researchers according to a procedure for thematic content analysis. RESULTS: A shared understanding of the complex decision-making involved in prescribing in general practice was reported by both GPs and tutors as essential for an open discussion in the CME groups. Tutors experienced that CME groups differed regarding structure and atmosphere, and in some groups it was a challenge to run the scheme as planned. Individual feedback motivated GPs to reflect on and to improve their prescribing practice, though feedback reports could cause distress if the prescribing practice was unfavourable. Explanations for inappropriate prescriptions were lack of knowledge, factors associated with patients, the GP's background, the practice, and other health professionals or health care facilities. CONCLUSIONS: GPs and tutors experienced peer group academic detailing as a suitable method to discuss and learn more about pharmacotherapy. An important outcome for GPs was being more reflective about their prescriptions. Disclosure of inappropriate prescribing can cause distress in some doctors, and tutors must be prepared to recognise and manage such reactions. BioMed Central 2010-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2828999/ /pubmed/20152015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-12 Text en Copyright ©2010 Frich et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Frich, Jan C
Høye, Sigurd
Lindbæk, Morten
Straand, Jørund
General practitioners and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing: a qualitative study
title General practitioners and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing: a qualitative study
title_full General practitioners and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing: a qualitative study
title_fullStr General practitioners and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed General practitioners and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing: a qualitative study
title_short General practitioners and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing: a qualitative study
title_sort general practitioners and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing: a qualitative study
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2828999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20152015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-12
work_keys_str_mv AT frichjanc generalpractitionersandtutorsexperienceswithpeergroupacademicdetailingaqualitativestudy
AT høyesigurd generalpractitionersandtutorsexperienceswithpeergroupacademicdetailingaqualitativestudy
AT lindbækmorten generalpractitionersandtutorsexperienceswithpeergroupacademicdetailingaqualitativestudy
AT straandjørund generalpractitionersandtutorsexperienceswithpeergroupacademicdetailingaqualitativestudy