Cargando…
Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study
Phonological theories of dyslexia assume a specific deficit in representation, storage and recall of phonemes. Various brain imaging techniques, including qEEG, point to the importance of a range of areas, predominantly the left hemispheric temporal areas. This study attempted to reduce reading and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19711183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-009-9105-2 |
_version_ | 1782178782996594688 |
---|---|
author | Breteler, Marinus H. M. Arns, Martijn Peters, Sylvia Giepmans, Ine Verhoeven, Ludo |
author_facet | Breteler, Marinus H. M. Arns, Martijn Peters, Sylvia Giepmans, Ine Verhoeven, Ludo |
author_sort | Breteler, Marinus H. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Phonological theories of dyslexia assume a specific deficit in representation, storage and recall of phonemes. Various brain imaging techniques, including qEEG, point to the importance of a range of areas, predominantly the left hemispheric temporal areas. This study attempted to reduce reading and spelling deficits in children who are dyslexic by means of neurofeedback training based on neurophysiological differences between the participants and gender and age matched controls. Nineteen children were randomized into an experimental group receiving qEEG based neurofeedback (n = 10) and a control group (n = 9). Both groups also received remedial teaching. The experimental group improved considerably in spelling (Cohen’s d = 3). No improvement was found in reading. An indepth study of the changes in the qEEG power and coherence protocols evidenced no fronto-central changes, which is in line with the absence of reading improvements. A significant increase of alpha coherence was found, which may be an indication that attentional processes account for the improvement in spelling. Consideration of subtypes of dyslexia may refine the results of future studies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2837193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28371932010-03-24 Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study Breteler, Marinus H. M. Arns, Martijn Peters, Sylvia Giepmans, Ine Verhoeven, Ludo Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Article Phonological theories of dyslexia assume a specific deficit in representation, storage and recall of phonemes. Various brain imaging techniques, including qEEG, point to the importance of a range of areas, predominantly the left hemispheric temporal areas. This study attempted to reduce reading and spelling deficits in children who are dyslexic by means of neurofeedback training based on neurophysiological differences between the participants and gender and age matched controls. Nineteen children were randomized into an experimental group receiving qEEG based neurofeedback (n = 10) and a control group (n = 9). Both groups also received remedial teaching. The experimental group improved considerably in spelling (Cohen’s d = 3). No improvement was found in reading. An indepth study of the changes in the qEEG power and coherence protocols evidenced no fronto-central changes, which is in line with the absence of reading improvements. A significant increase of alpha coherence was found, which may be an indication that attentional processes account for the improvement in spelling. Consideration of subtypes of dyslexia may refine the results of future studies. Springer US 2009-08-27 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2837193/ /pubmed/19711183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-009-9105-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Breteler, Marinus H. M. Arns, Martijn Peters, Sylvia Giepmans, Ine Verhoeven, Ludo Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study |
title | Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study |
title_full | Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study |
title_fullStr | Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study |
title_short | Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study |
title_sort | improvements in spelling after qeeg-based neurofeedback in dyslexia: a randomized controlled treatment study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19711183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-009-9105-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bretelermarinushm improvementsinspellingafterqeegbasedneurofeedbackindyslexiaarandomizedcontrolledtreatmentstudy AT arnsmartijn improvementsinspellingafterqeegbasedneurofeedbackindyslexiaarandomizedcontrolledtreatmentstudy AT peterssylvia improvementsinspellingafterqeegbasedneurofeedbackindyslexiaarandomizedcontrolledtreatmentstudy AT giepmansine improvementsinspellingafterqeegbasedneurofeedbackindyslexiaarandomizedcontrolledtreatmentstudy AT verhoevenludo improvementsinspellingafterqeegbasedneurofeedbackindyslexiaarandomizedcontrolledtreatmentstudy |