Cargando…

Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study

Phonological theories of dyslexia assume a specific deficit in representation, storage and recall of phonemes. Various brain imaging techniques, including qEEG, point to the importance of a range of areas, predominantly the left hemispheric temporal areas. This study attempted to reduce reading and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breteler, Marinus H. M., Arns, Martijn, Peters, Sylvia, Giepmans, Ine, Verhoeven, Ludo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19711183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-009-9105-2
_version_ 1782178782996594688
author Breteler, Marinus H. M.
Arns, Martijn
Peters, Sylvia
Giepmans, Ine
Verhoeven, Ludo
author_facet Breteler, Marinus H. M.
Arns, Martijn
Peters, Sylvia
Giepmans, Ine
Verhoeven, Ludo
author_sort Breteler, Marinus H. M.
collection PubMed
description Phonological theories of dyslexia assume a specific deficit in representation, storage and recall of phonemes. Various brain imaging techniques, including qEEG, point to the importance of a range of areas, predominantly the left hemispheric temporal areas. This study attempted to reduce reading and spelling deficits in children who are dyslexic by means of neurofeedback training based on neurophysiological differences between the participants and gender and age matched controls. Nineteen children were randomized into an experimental group receiving qEEG based neurofeedback (n = 10) and a control group (n = 9). Both groups also received remedial teaching. The experimental group improved considerably in spelling (Cohen’s d = 3). No improvement was found in reading. An indepth study of the changes in the qEEG power and coherence protocols evidenced no fronto-central changes, which is in line with the absence of reading improvements. A significant increase of alpha coherence was found, which may be an indication that attentional processes account for the improvement in spelling. Consideration of subtypes of dyslexia may refine the results of future studies.
format Text
id pubmed-2837193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28371932010-03-24 Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study Breteler, Marinus H. M. Arns, Martijn Peters, Sylvia Giepmans, Ine Verhoeven, Ludo Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Article Phonological theories of dyslexia assume a specific deficit in representation, storage and recall of phonemes. Various brain imaging techniques, including qEEG, point to the importance of a range of areas, predominantly the left hemispheric temporal areas. This study attempted to reduce reading and spelling deficits in children who are dyslexic by means of neurofeedback training based on neurophysiological differences between the participants and gender and age matched controls. Nineteen children were randomized into an experimental group receiving qEEG based neurofeedback (n = 10) and a control group (n = 9). Both groups also received remedial teaching. The experimental group improved considerably in spelling (Cohen’s d = 3). No improvement was found in reading. An indepth study of the changes in the qEEG power and coherence protocols evidenced no fronto-central changes, which is in line with the absence of reading improvements. A significant increase of alpha coherence was found, which may be an indication that attentional processes account for the improvement in spelling. Consideration of subtypes of dyslexia may refine the results of future studies. Springer US 2009-08-27 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2837193/ /pubmed/19711183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-009-9105-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Breteler, Marinus H. M.
Arns, Martijn
Peters, Sylvia
Giepmans, Ine
Verhoeven, Ludo
Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study
title Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study
title_full Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study
title_fullStr Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study
title_full_unstemmed Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study
title_short Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study
title_sort improvements in spelling after qeeg-based neurofeedback in dyslexia: a randomized controlled treatment study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19711183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-009-9105-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bretelermarinushm improvementsinspellingafterqeegbasedneurofeedbackindyslexiaarandomizedcontrolledtreatmentstudy
AT arnsmartijn improvementsinspellingafterqeegbasedneurofeedbackindyslexiaarandomizedcontrolledtreatmentstudy
AT peterssylvia improvementsinspellingafterqeegbasedneurofeedbackindyslexiaarandomizedcontrolledtreatmentstudy
AT giepmansine improvementsinspellingafterqeegbasedneurofeedbackindyslexiaarandomizedcontrolledtreatmentstudy
AT verhoevenludo improvementsinspellingafterqeegbasedneurofeedbackindyslexiaarandomizedcontrolledtreatmentstudy