Cargando…

Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes

[Image: see text] In-depth, reproducible coverage of complex proteomes is challenging because the complexity of tryptic digests subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis frequently exceeds mass spectrometer analytical capacity, which results in undersampling of data. In this study, we used cancer cell lysates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Huan, Chang-Wong, Tony, Tang, Hsin-Yao, Speicher, David W.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2009
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2870931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20014860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr900927y
_version_ 1782181133440516096
author Wang, Huan
Chang-Wong, Tony
Tang, Hsin-Yao
Speicher, David W.
author_facet Wang, Huan
Chang-Wong, Tony
Tang, Hsin-Yao
Speicher, David W.
author_sort Wang, Huan
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] In-depth, reproducible coverage of complex proteomes is challenging because the complexity of tryptic digests subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis frequently exceeds mass spectrometer analytical capacity, which results in undersampling of data. In this study, we used cancer cell lysates to systematically compare the commonly used GeLC-MS/MS (1-D protein + 1-D peptide separation) method using four repetitive injections (2-D/repetitive) with a 3-D method that included solution isoelectric focusing and involved an equal number of LC-MS/MS runs. The 3-D method detected substantially more unique peptides and proteins, including higher numbers of unique peptides from low-abundance proteins, demonstrating that additional fractionation at the protein level is more effective than repetitive analyses at overcoming LC-MS/MS undersampling. Importantly, more than 90% of the 2-D/repetitive protein identifications were found in the 3-D method data in a direct protein level comparison, and the reproducibility between data sets increased to greater than 96% when factors such as database redundancy and use of rigid scoring thresholds were considered. Hence, high reproducibility of complex proteomes, such as human cancer cell lysates, readily can be achieved when using multidimensional separation methods with good depth of analysis.
format Text
id pubmed-2870931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28709312010-05-14 Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes Wang, Huan Chang-Wong, Tony Tang, Hsin-Yao Speicher, David W. J Proteome Res [Image: see text] In-depth, reproducible coverage of complex proteomes is challenging because the complexity of tryptic digests subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis frequently exceeds mass spectrometer analytical capacity, which results in undersampling of data. In this study, we used cancer cell lysates to systematically compare the commonly used GeLC-MS/MS (1-D protein + 1-D peptide separation) method using four repetitive injections (2-D/repetitive) with a 3-D method that included solution isoelectric focusing and involved an equal number of LC-MS/MS runs. The 3-D method detected substantially more unique peptides and proteins, including higher numbers of unique peptides from low-abundance proteins, demonstrating that additional fractionation at the protein level is more effective than repetitive analyses at overcoming LC-MS/MS undersampling. Importantly, more than 90% of the 2-D/repetitive protein identifications were found in the 3-D method data in a direct protein level comparison, and the reproducibility between data sets increased to greater than 96% when factors such as database redundancy and use of rigid scoring thresholds were considered. Hence, high reproducibility of complex proteomes, such as human cancer cell lysates, readily can be achieved when using multidimensional separation methods with good depth of analysis. American Chemical Society 2009-12-16 2010-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2870931/ /pubmed/20014860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr900927y Text en Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org.
spellingShingle Wang, Huan
Chang-Wong, Tony
Tang, Hsin-Yao
Speicher, David W.
Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes
title Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes
title_full Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes
title_fullStr Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes
title_short Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes
title_sort comparison of extensive protein fractionation and repetitive lc-ms/ms analyses on depth of analysis for complex proteomes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2870931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20014860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr900927y
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghuan comparisonofextensiveproteinfractionationandrepetitivelcmsmsanalysesondepthofanalysisforcomplexproteomes
AT changwongtony comparisonofextensiveproteinfractionationandrepetitivelcmsmsanalysesondepthofanalysisforcomplexproteomes
AT tanghsinyao comparisonofextensiveproteinfractionationandrepetitivelcmsmsanalysesondepthofanalysisforcomplexproteomes
AT speicherdavidw comparisonofextensiveproteinfractionationandrepetitivelcmsmsanalysesondepthofanalysisforcomplexproteomes