Cargando…
Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes
[Image: see text] In-depth, reproducible coverage of complex proteomes is challenging because the complexity of tryptic digests subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis frequently exceeds mass spectrometer analytical capacity, which results in undersampling of data. In this study, we used cancer cell lysates...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2009
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2870931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20014860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr900927y |
_version_ | 1782181133440516096 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Huan Chang-Wong, Tony Tang, Hsin-Yao Speicher, David W. |
author_facet | Wang, Huan Chang-Wong, Tony Tang, Hsin-Yao Speicher, David W. |
author_sort | Wang, Huan |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] In-depth, reproducible coverage of complex proteomes is challenging because the complexity of tryptic digests subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis frequently exceeds mass spectrometer analytical capacity, which results in undersampling of data. In this study, we used cancer cell lysates to systematically compare the commonly used GeLC-MS/MS (1-D protein + 1-D peptide separation) method using four repetitive injections (2-D/repetitive) with a 3-D method that included solution isoelectric focusing and involved an equal number of LC-MS/MS runs. The 3-D method detected substantially more unique peptides and proteins, including higher numbers of unique peptides from low-abundance proteins, demonstrating that additional fractionation at the protein level is more effective than repetitive analyses at overcoming LC-MS/MS undersampling. Importantly, more than 90% of the 2-D/repetitive protein identifications were found in the 3-D method data in a direct protein level comparison, and the reproducibility between data sets increased to greater than 96% when factors such as database redundancy and use of rigid scoring thresholds were considered. Hence, high reproducibility of complex proteomes, such as human cancer cell lysates, readily can be achieved when using multidimensional separation methods with good depth of analysis. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2870931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28709312010-05-14 Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes Wang, Huan Chang-Wong, Tony Tang, Hsin-Yao Speicher, David W. J Proteome Res [Image: see text] In-depth, reproducible coverage of complex proteomes is challenging because the complexity of tryptic digests subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis frequently exceeds mass spectrometer analytical capacity, which results in undersampling of data. In this study, we used cancer cell lysates to systematically compare the commonly used GeLC-MS/MS (1-D protein + 1-D peptide separation) method using four repetitive injections (2-D/repetitive) with a 3-D method that included solution isoelectric focusing and involved an equal number of LC-MS/MS runs. The 3-D method detected substantially more unique peptides and proteins, including higher numbers of unique peptides from low-abundance proteins, demonstrating that additional fractionation at the protein level is more effective than repetitive analyses at overcoming LC-MS/MS undersampling. Importantly, more than 90% of the 2-D/repetitive protein identifications were found in the 3-D method data in a direct protein level comparison, and the reproducibility between data sets increased to greater than 96% when factors such as database redundancy and use of rigid scoring thresholds were considered. Hence, high reproducibility of complex proteomes, such as human cancer cell lysates, readily can be achieved when using multidimensional separation methods with good depth of analysis. American Chemical Society 2009-12-16 2010-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2870931/ /pubmed/20014860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr900927y Text en Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org. |
spellingShingle | Wang, Huan Chang-Wong, Tony Tang, Hsin-Yao Speicher, David W. Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes |
title | Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes |
title_full | Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes |
title_short | Comparison of Extensive Protein Fractionation and Repetitive LC-MS/MS Analyses on Depth of Analysis for Complex Proteomes |
title_sort | comparison of extensive protein fractionation and repetitive lc-ms/ms analyses on depth of analysis for complex proteomes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2870931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20014860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr900927y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanghuan comparisonofextensiveproteinfractionationandrepetitivelcmsmsanalysesondepthofanalysisforcomplexproteomes AT changwongtony comparisonofextensiveproteinfractionationandrepetitivelcmsmsanalysesondepthofanalysisforcomplexproteomes AT tanghsinyao comparisonofextensiveproteinfractionationandrepetitivelcmsmsanalysesondepthofanalysisforcomplexproteomes AT speicherdavidw comparisonofextensiveproteinfractionationandrepetitivelcmsmsanalysesondepthofanalysisforcomplexproteomes |