Cargando…

Selection in spatial stochastic models of cancer: Migration as a key modulator of fitness

BACKGROUND: We study the selection dynamics in a heterogeneous spatial colony of cells. We use two spatial generalizations of the Moran process, which include cell divisions, death and migration. In the first model, migration is included explicitly as movement to a proximal location. In the second,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thalhauser, Craig J, Lowengrub, John S, Stupack, Dwayne, Komarova, Natalia L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20406439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-21
_version_ 1782181417875144704
author Thalhauser, Craig J
Lowengrub, John S
Stupack, Dwayne
Komarova, Natalia L
author_facet Thalhauser, Craig J
Lowengrub, John S
Stupack, Dwayne
Komarova, Natalia L
author_sort Thalhauser, Craig J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We study the selection dynamics in a heterogeneous spatial colony of cells. We use two spatial generalizations of the Moran process, which include cell divisions, death and migration. In the first model, migration is included explicitly as movement to a proximal location. In the second, migration is implicit, through the varied ability of cell types to place their offspring a distance away, in response to another cell's death. RESULTS: In both models, we find that migration has a direct positive impact on the ability of a single mutant cell to invade a pre-existing colony. Thus, a decrease in the growth potential can be compensated by an increase in cell migration. We further find that the neutral ridges (the set of all types with the invasion probability equal to that of the host cells) remain invariant under the increase of system size (for large system sizes), thus making the invasion probability a universal characteristic of the cells selection status. We find that repeated instances of large scale cell-death, such as might arise during therapeutic intervention or host response, strongly select for the migratory phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: These models can help explain the many examples in the biological literature, where genes involved in cell's migratory and invasive machinery are also associated with increased cellular fitness, even though there is no known direct effect of these genes on the cellular reproduction. The models can also help to explain how chemotherapy may provide a selection mechanism for highly invasive phenotypes. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Marek Kimmel and Glenn Webb.
format Text
id pubmed-2873940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28739402010-05-21 Selection in spatial stochastic models of cancer: Migration as a key modulator of fitness Thalhauser, Craig J Lowengrub, John S Stupack, Dwayne Komarova, Natalia L Biol Direct Research BACKGROUND: We study the selection dynamics in a heterogeneous spatial colony of cells. We use two spatial generalizations of the Moran process, which include cell divisions, death and migration. In the first model, migration is included explicitly as movement to a proximal location. In the second, migration is implicit, through the varied ability of cell types to place their offspring a distance away, in response to another cell's death. RESULTS: In both models, we find that migration has a direct positive impact on the ability of a single mutant cell to invade a pre-existing colony. Thus, a decrease in the growth potential can be compensated by an increase in cell migration. We further find that the neutral ridges (the set of all types with the invasion probability equal to that of the host cells) remain invariant under the increase of system size (for large system sizes), thus making the invasion probability a universal characteristic of the cells selection status. We find that repeated instances of large scale cell-death, such as might arise during therapeutic intervention or host response, strongly select for the migratory phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: These models can help explain the many examples in the biological literature, where genes involved in cell's migratory and invasive machinery are also associated with increased cellular fitness, even though there is no known direct effect of these genes on the cellular reproduction. The models can also help to explain how chemotherapy may provide a selection mechanism for highly invasive phenotypes. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Marek Kimmel and Glenn Webb. BioMed Central 2010-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2873940/ /pubmed/20406439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-21 Text en Copyright ©2010 Thalhauser et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Thalhauser, Craig J
Lowengrub, John S
Stupack, Dwayne
Komarova, Natalia L
Selection in spatial stochastic models of cancer: Migration as a key modulator of fitness
title Selection in spatial stochastic models of cancer: Migration as a key modulator of fitness
title_full Selection in spatial stochastic models of cancer: Migration as a key modulator of fitness
title_fullStr Selection in spatial stochastic models of cancer: Migration as a key modulator of fitness
title_full_unstemmed Selection in spatial stochastic models of cancer: Migration as a key modulator of fitness
title_short Selection in spatial stochastic models of cancer: Migration as a key modulator of fitness
title_sort selection in spatial stochastic models of cancer: migration as a key modulator of fitness
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20406439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-21
work_keys_str_mv AT thalhausercraigj selectioninspatialstochasticmodelsofcancermigrationasakeymodulatoroffitness
AT lowengrubjohns selectioninspatialstochasticmodelsofcancermigrationasakeymodulatoroffitness
AT stupackdwayne selectioninspatialstochasticmodelsofcancermigrationasakeymodulatoroffitness
AT komarovanatalial selectioninspatialstochasticmodelsofcancermigrationasakeymodulatoroffitness