Cargando…

Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and De Novo Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends

In budding yeast, an HO endonuclease-inducible double-strand break (DSB) is efficiently repaired by several homologous recombination (HR) pathways. In contrast to gene conversion (GC), where both ends of the DSB can recombine with the same template, break-induced replication (BIR) occurs when only t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lydeard, John R., Lipkin-Moore, Zachary, Jain, Suvi, Eapen, Vinay V., Haber, James E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2877739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20523895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000973
_version_ 1782181811292471296
author Lydeard, John R.
Lipkin-Moore, Zachary
Jain, Suvi
Eapen, Vinay V.
Haber, James E.
author_facet Lydeard, John R.
Lipkin-Moore, Zachary
Jain, Suvi
Eapen, Vinay V.
Haber, James E.
author_sort Lydeard, John R.
collection PubMed
description In budding yeast, an HO endonuclease-inducible double-strand break (DSB) is efficiently repaired by several homologous recombination (HR) pathways. In contrast to gene conversion (GC), where both ends of the DSB can recombine with the same template, break-induced replication (BIR) occurs when only the centromere-proximal end of the DSB can locate homologous sequences. Whereas GC results in a small patch of new DNA synthesis, BIR leads to a nonreciprocal translocation. The requirements for completing BIR are significantly different from those of GC, but both processes require 5′ to 3′ resection of DSB ends to create single-stranded DNA that leads to formation of a Rad51 filament required to initiate HR. Resection proceeds by two pathways dependent on Exo1 or the BLM homolog, Sgs1. We report that Exo1 and Sgs1 each inhibit BIR but have little effect on GC, while overexpression of either protein severely inhibits BIR. In contrast, overexpression of Rad51 markedly increases the efficiency of BIR, again with little effect on GC. In sgs1Δ exo1Δ strains, where there is little 5′ to 3′ resection, the level of BIR is not different from either single mutant; surprisingly, there is a two-fold increase in cell viability after HO induction whereby 40% of all cells survive by formation of a new telomere within a few kb of the site of DNA cleavage. De novo telomere addition is rare in wild-type, sgs1Δ, or exo1Δ cells. In sgs1Δ exo1Δ, repair by GC is severely inhibited, but cell viaiblity remains high because of new telomere formation. These data suggest that the extensive 5′ to 3′ resection that occurs before the initiation of new DNA synthesis in BIR may prevent efficient maintenance of a Rad51 filament near the DSB end. The severe constraint on 5′ to 3′ resection, which also abrogates activation of the Mec1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint, permits an unprecedented level of new telomere addition.
format Text
id pubmed-2877739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28777392010-06-03 Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and De Novo Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends Lydeard, John R. Lipkin-Moore, Zachary Jain, Suvi Eapen, Vinay V. Haber, James E. PLoS Genet Research Article In budding yeast, an HO endonuclease-inducible double-strand break (DSB) is efficiently repaired by several homologous recombination (HR) pathways. In contrast to gene conversion (GC), where both ends of the DSB can recombine with the same template, break-induced replication (BIR) occurs when only the centromere-proximal end of the DSB can locate homologous sequences. Whereas GC results in a small patch of new DNA synthesis, BIR leads to a nonreciprocal translocation. The requirements for completing BIR are significantly different from those of GC, but both processes require 5′ to 3′ resection of DSB ends to create single-stranded DNA that leads to formation of a Rad51 filament required to initiate HR. Resection proceeds by two pathways dependent on Exo1 or the BLM homolog, Sgs1. We report that Exo1 and Sgs1 each inhibit BIR but have little effect on GC, while overexpression of either protein severely inhibits BIR. In contrast, overexpression of Rad51 markedly increases the efficiency of BIR, again with little effect on GC. In sgs1Δ exo1Δ strains, where there is little 5′ to 3′ resection, the level of BIR is not different from either single mutant; surprisingly, there is a two-fold increase in cell viability after HO induction whereby 40% of all cells survive by formation of a new telomere within a few kb of the site of DNA cleavage. De novo telomere addition is rare in wild-type, sgs1Δ, or exo1Δ cells. In sgs1Δ exo1Δ, repair by GC is severely inhibited, but cell viaiblity remains high because of new telomere formation. These data suggest that the extensive 5′ to 3′ resection that occurs before the initiation of new DNA synthesis in BIR may prevent efficient maintenance of a Rad51 filament near the DSB end. The severe constraint on 5′ to 3′ resection, which also abrogates activation of the Mec1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint, permits an unprecedented level of new telomere addition. Public Library of Science 2010-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2877739/ /pubmed/20523895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000973 Text en Lydeard et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lydeard, John R.
Lipkin-Moore, Zachary
Jain, Suvi
Eapen, Vinay V.
Haber, James E.
Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and De Novo Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends
title Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and De Novo Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends
title_full Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and De Novo Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends
title_fullStr Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and De Novo Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends
title_full_unstemmed Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and De Novo Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends
title_short Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and De Novo Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends
title_sort sgs1 and exo1 redundantly inhibit break-induced replication and de novo telomere addition at broken chromosome ends
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2877739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20523895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000973
work_keys_str_mv AT lydeardjohnr sgs1andexo1redundantlyinhibitbreakinducedreplicationanddenovotelomereadditionatbrokenchromosomeends
AT lipkinmoorezachary sgs1andexo1redundantlyinhibitbreakinducedreplicationanddenovotelomereadditionatbrokenchromosomeends
AT jainsuvi sgs1andexo1redundantlyinhibitbreakinducedreplicationanddenovotelomereadditionatbrokenchromosomeends
AT eapenvinayv sgs1andexo1redundantlyinhibitbreakinducedreplicationanddenovotelomereadditionatbrokenchromosomeends
AT haberjamese sgs1andexo1redundantlyinhibitbreakinducedreplicationanddenovotelomereadditionatbrokenchromosomeends