Cargando…

Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice

BACKGROUND: The implementation of new medical knowledge into general practice is a complex process. Blended learning may offer an effective and efficient educational intervention to reduce the knowledge-to-practice gap. The aim of this study was to compare knowledge acquisition about dementia manage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vollmar, Horst C, Mayer, Herbert, Ostermann, Thomas, Butzlaff, Martin E, Sandars, John E, Wilm, Stefan, Rieger, Monika A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2881109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20047652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-1
_version_ 1782182096095150080
author Vollmar, Horst C
Mayer, Herbert
Ostermann, Thomas
Butzlaff, Martin E
Sandars, John E
Wilm, Stefan
Rieger, Monika A
author_facet Vollmar, Horst C
Mayer, Herbert
Ostermann, Thomas
Butzlaff, Martin E
Sandars, John E
Wilm, Stefan
Rieger, Monika A
author_sort Vollmar, Horst C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The implementation of new medical knowledge into general practice is a complex process. Blended learning may offer an effective and efficient educational intervention to reduce the knowledge-to-practice gap. The aim of this study was to compare knowledge acquisition about dementia management between a blended learning approach using online modules in addition to quality circles (QCs) and QCs alone. METHODS: In this cluster-randomised trial with QCs as clusters and general practitioners (GPs) as participants, 389 GPs from 26 QCs in the western part of Germany were invited to participate. Data on the GPs' knowledge were obtained at three points in time by means of a questionnaire survey. Primary outcome was the knowledge gain before and after the interventions. A subgroup analysis of the users of the online modules was performed. RESULTS: 166 GPs were available for analysis and filled out a knowledge test at least two times. A significant increase of knowledge was found in both groups that indicated positive learning effects of both approaches. However, there was no significant difference between the groups. A subgroup analysis of the GPs who self-reported that they had actually used the online modules showed that they had a significant increase in their knowledge scores. CONCLUSION: A blended learning approach was not superior to a QCs approach for improving knowledge about dementia management. However, a subgroup of GPs who were motivated to actually use the online modules had a gain in knowledge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN36550981.
format Text
id pubmed-2881109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28811092010-06-05 Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice Vollmar, Horst C Mayer, Herbert Ostermann, Thomas Butzlaff, Martin E Sandars, John E Wilm, Stefan Rieger, Monika A Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: The implementation of new medical knowledge into general practice is a complex process. Blended learning may offer an effective and efficient educational intervention to reduce the knowledge-to-practice gap. The aim of this study was to compare knowledge acquisition about dementia management between a blended learning approach using online modules in addition to quality circles (QCs) and QCs alone. METHODS: In this cluster-randomised trial with QCs as clusters and general practitioners (GPs) as participants, 389 GPs from 26 QCs in the western part of Germany were invited to participate. Data on the GPs' knowledge were obtained at three points in time by means of a questionnaire survey. Primary outcome was the knowledge gain before and after the interventions. A subgroup analysis of the users of the online modules was performed. RESULTS: 166 GPs were available for analysis and filled out a knowledge test at least two times. A significant increase of knowledge was found in both groups that indicated positive learning effects of both approaches. However, there was no significant difference between the groups. A subgroup analysis of the GPs who self-reported that they had actually used the online modules showed that they had a significant increase in their knowledge scores. CONCLUSION: A blended learning approach was not superior to a QCs approach for improving knowledge about dementia management. However, a subgroup of GPs who were motivated to actually use the online modules had a gain in knowledge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN36550981. BioMed Central 2010-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2881109/ /pubmed/20047652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-1 Text en Copyright ©2010 Vollmar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vollmar, Horst C
Mayer, Herbert
Ostermann, Thomas
Butzlaff, Martin E
Sandars, John E
Wilm, Stefan
Rieger, Monika A
Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice
title Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice
title_full Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice
title_fullStr Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice
title_short Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice
title_sort knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2881109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20047652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vollmarhorstc knowledgetransferforthemanagementofdementiaaclusterrandomisedtrialofblendedlearningingeneralpractice
AT mayerherbert knowledgetransferforthemanagementofdementiaaclusterrandomisedtrialofblendedlearningingeneralpractice
AT ostermannthomas knowledgetransferforthemanagementofdementiaaclusterrandomisedtrialofblendedlearningingeneralpractice
AT butzlaffmartine knowledgetransferforthemanagementofdementiaaclusterrandomisedtrialofblendedlearningingeneralpractice
AT sandarsjohne knowledgetransferforthemanagementofdementiaaclusterrandomisedtrialofblendedlearningingeneralpractice
AT wilmstefan knowledgetransferforthemanagementofdementiaaclusterrandomisedtrialofblendedlearningingeneralpractice
AT riegermonikaa knowledgetransferforthemanagementofdementiaaclusterrandomisedtrialofblendedlearningingeneralpractice