Cargando…

Peptide-MHC heterodimers show that thymic positive selection requires a more restricted set of self-peptides than negative selection

T cell selection and maturation in the thymus depends on the interactions between T cell receptors (TCRs) and different self-peptide–major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecules. We show that the affinity of the OT-I TCR for its endogenous positively selecting ligands, Catnb-H-2K(b) and Cappa1-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juang, Jeremy, Ebert, Peter J.R., Feng, Dan, Garcia, K. Christopher, Krogsgaard, Michelle, Davis, Mark M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20457759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20092170
_version_ 1782182205975429120
author Juang, Jeremy
Ebert, Peter J.R.
Feng, Dan
Garcia, K. Christopher
Krogsgaard, Michelle
Davis, Mark M.
author_facet Juang, Jeremy
Ebert, Peter J.R.
Feng, Dan
Garcia, K. Christopher
Krogsgaard, Michelle
Davis, Mark M.
author_sort Juang, Jeremy
collection PubMed
description T cell selection and maturation in the thymus depends on the interactions between T cell receptors (TCRs) and different self-peptide–major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecules. We show that the affinity of the OT-I TCR for its endogenous positively selecting ligands, Catnb-H-2K(b) and Cappa1-H-2K(b), is significantly lower than for previously reported positively selecting altered peptide ligands. To understand how these extremely weak endogenous ligands produce signals in maturing thymocytes, we generated soluble monomeric and dimeric peptide–H-2K(b) ligands. Soluble monomeric ovalbumin (OVA)-K(b) molecules elicited no detectable signaling in OT-I thymocytes, whereas heterodimers of OVA-K(b) paired with positively selecting or nonselecting endogenous peptides, but not an engineered null peptide, induced deletion. In contrast, dimer-induced positive selection was much more sensitive to the identity of the partner peptide. Catnb-K(b)–Catnb-K(b) homodimers, but not heterodimers of Catnb-K(b) paired with a nonselecting peptide-K(b), induced positive selection, even though both ligands bind the OT-I TCR with detectable affinity. Thus, both positive and negative selection can be driven by dimeric but not monomeric ligands. In addition, positive selection has much more stringent requirements for the partner self-pMHC.
format Text
id pubmed-2882826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28828262010-12-07 Peptide-MHC heterodimers show that thymic positive selection requires a more restricted set of self-peptides than negative selection Juang, Jeremy Ebert, Peter J.R. Feng, Dan Garcia, K. Christopher Krogsgaard, Michelle Davis, Mark M. J Exp Med Article T cell selection and maturation in the thymus depends on the interactions between T cell receptors (TCRs) and different self-peptide–major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecules. We show that the affinity of the OT-I TCR for its endogenous positively selecting ligands, Catnb-H-2K(b) and Cappa1-H-2K(b), is significantly lower than for previously reported positively selecting altered peptide ligands. To understand how these extremely weak endogenous ligands produce signals in maturing thymocytes, we generated soluble monomeric and dimeric peptide–H-2K(b) ligands. Soluble monomeric ovalbumin (OVA)-K(b) molecules elicited no detectable signaling in OT-I thymocytes, whereas heterodimers of OVA-K(b) paired with positively selecting or nonselecting endogenous peptides, but not an engineered null peptide, induced deletion. In contrast, dimer-induced positive selection was much more sensitive to the identity of the partner peptide. Catnb-K(b)–Catnb-K(b) homodimers, but not heterodimers of Catnb-K(b) paired with a nonselecting peptide-K(b), induced positive selection, even though both ligands bind the OT-I TCR with detectable affinity. Thus, both positive and negative selection can be driven by dimeric but not monomeric ligands. In addition, positive selection has much more stringent requirements for the partner self-pMHC. The Rockefeller University Press 2010-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2882826/ /pubmed/20457759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20092170 Text en © 2010 Juang et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Juang, Jeremy
Ebert, Peter J.R.
Feng, Dan
Garcia, K. Christopher
Krogsgaard, Michelle
Davis, Mark M.
Peptide-MHC heterodimers show that thymic positive selection requires a more restricted set of self-peptides than negative selection
title Peptide-MHC heterodimers show that thymic positive selection requires a more restricted set of self-peptides than negative selection
title_full Peptide-MHC heterodimers show that thymic positive selection requires a more restricted set of self-peptides than negative selection
title_fullStr Peptide-MHC heterodimers show that thymic positive selection requires a more restricted set of self-peptides than negative selection
title_full_unstemmed Peptide-MHC heterodimers show that thymic positive selection requires a more restricted set of self-peptides than negative selection
title_short Peptide-MHC heterodimers show that thymic positive selection requires a more restricted set of self-peptides than negative selection
title_sort peptide-mhc heterodimers show that thymic positive selection requires a more restricted set of self-peptides than negative selection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20457759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20092170
work_keys_str_mv AT juangjeremy peptidemhcheterodimersshowthatthymicpositiveselectionrequiresamorerestrictedsetofselfpeptidesthannegativeselection
AT ebertpeterjr peptidemhcheterodimersshowthatthymicpositiveselectionrequiresamorerestrictedsetofselfpeptidesthannegativeselection
AT fengdan peptidemhcheterodimersshowthatthymicpositiveselectionrequiresamorerestrictedsetofselfpeptidesthannegativeselection
AT garciakchristopher peptidemhcheterodimersshowthatthymicpositiveselectionrequiresamorerestrictedsetofselfpeptidesthannegativeselection
AT krogsgaardmichelle peptidemhcheterodimersshowthatthymicpositiveselectionrequiresamorerestrictedsetofselfpeptidesthannegativeselection
AT davismarkm peptidemhcheterodimersshowthatthymicpositiveselectionrequiresamorerestrictedsetofselfpeptidesthannegativeselection