Cargando…
G-stack modulated probe intensities on expression arrays - sequence corrections and signal calibration
BACKGROUND: The brightness of the probe spots on expression microarrays intends to measure the abundance of specific mRNA targets. Probes with runs of at least three guanines (G) in their sequence show abnormal high intensities which reflect rather probe effects than target concentrations. This G-bi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2884167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20423484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-207 |
_version_ | 1782182311011287040 |
---|---|
author | Fasold, Mario Stadler, Peter F Binder, Hans |
author_facet | Fasold, Mario Stadler, Peter F Binder, Hans |
author_sort | Fasold, Mario |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The brightness of the probe spots on expression microarrays intends to measure the abundance of specific mRNA targets. Probes with runs of at least three guanines (G) in their sequence show abnormal high intensities which reflect rather probe effects than target concentrations. This G-bias requires correction prior to downstream expression analysis. RESULTS: Longer runs of three or more consecutive G along the probe sequence and in particular triple degenerated G at its solution end ((GGG)(1)-effect) are associated with exceptionally large probe intensities on GeneChip expression arrays. This intensity bias is related to non-specific hybridization and affects both perfect match and mismatch probes. The (GGG)(1)-effect tends to increase gradually for microarrays of later GeneChip generations. It was found for DNA/RNA as well as for DNA/DNA probe/target-hybridization chemistries. Amplification of sample RNA using T7-primers is associated with strong positive amplitudes of the G-bias whereas alternative amplification protocols using random primers give rise to much smaller and partly even negative amplitudes. We applied positional dependent sensitivity models to analyze the specifics of probe intensities in the context of all possible short sequence motifs of one to four adjacent nucleotides along the 25meric probe sequence. Most of the longer motifs are adequately described using a nearest-neighbor (NN) model. In contrast, runs of degenerated guanines require explicit consideration of next nearest neighbors (GGG terms). Preprocessing methods such as vsn, RMA, dChip, MAS5 and gcRMA only insufficiently remove the G-bias from data. CONCLUSIONS: Positional and motif dependent sensitivity models accounts for sequence effects of oligonucleotide probe intensities. We propose a positional dependent NN+GGG hybrid model to correct the intensity bias associated with probes containing poly-G motifs. It is implemented as a single-chip based calibration algorithm for GeneChips which can be applied in a pre-correction step prior to standard preprocessing. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2884167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28841672010-06-14 G-stack modulated probe intensities on expression arrays - sequence corrections and signal calibration Fasold, Mario Stadler, Peter F Binder, Hans BMC Bioinformatics Research article BACKGROUND: The brightness of the probe spots on expression microarrays intends to measure the abundance of specific mRNA targets. Probes with runs of at least three guanines (G) in their sequence show abnormal high intensities which reflect rather probe effects than target concentrations. This G-bias requires correction prior to downstream expression analysis. RESULTS: Longer runs of three or more consecutive G along the probe sequence and in particular triple degenerated G at its solution end ((GGG)(1)-effect) are associated with exceptionally large probe intensities on GeneChip expression arrays. This intensity bias is related to non-specific hybridization and affects both perfect match and mismatch probes. The (GGG)(1)-effect tends to increase gradually for microarrays of later GeneChip generations. It was found for DNA/RNA as well as for DNA/DNA probe/target-hybridization chemistries. Amplification of sample RNA using T7-primers is associated with strong positive amplitudes of the G-bias whereas alternative amplification protocols using random primers give rise to much smaller and partly even negative amplitudes. We applied positional dependent sensitivity models to analyze the specifics of probe intensities in the context of all possible short sequence motifs of one to four adjacent nucleotides along the 25meric probe sequence. Most of the longer motifs are adequately described using a nearest-neighbor (NN) model. In contrast, runs of degenerated guanines require explicit consideration of next nearest neighbors (GGG terms). Preprocessing methods such as vsn, RMA, dChip, MAS5 and gcRMA only insufficiently remove the G-bias from data. CONCLUSIONS: Positional and motif dependent sensitivity models accounts for sequence effects of oligonucleotide probe intensities. We propose a positional dependent NN+GGG hybrid model to correct the intensity bias associated with probes containing poly-G motifs. It is implemented as a single-chip based calibration algorithm for GeneChips which can be applied in a pre-correction step prior to standard preprocessing. BioMed Central 2010-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2884167/ /pubmed/20423484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-207 Text en Copyright ©2010 Fasold et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Fasold, Mario Stadler, Peter F Binder, Hans G-stack modulated probe intensities on expression arrays - sequence corrections and signal calibration |
title | G-stack modulated probe intensities on expression arrays - sequence corrections and signal calibration |
title_full | G-stack modulated probe intensities on expression arrays - sequence corrections and signal calibration |
title_fullStr | G-stack modulated probe intensities on expression arrays - sequence corrections and signal calibration |
title_full_unstemmed | G-stack modulated probe intensities on expression arrays - sequence corrections and signal calibration |
title_short | G-stack modulated probe intensities on expression arrays - sequence corrections and signal calibration |
title_sort | g-stack modulated probe intensities on expression arrays - sequence corrections and signal calibration |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2884167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20423484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fasoldmario gstackmodulatedprobeintensitiesonexpressionarrayssequencecorrectionsandsignalcalibration AT stadlerpeterf gstackmodulatedprobeintensitiesonexpressionarrayssequencecorrectionsandsignalcalibration AT binderhans gstackmodulatedprobeintensitiesonexpressionarrayssequencecorrectionsandsignalcalibration |