Cargando…
Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine
DNA cytosine-5 methylation is a well-studied epigenetic pathway implicated in gene expression control and disease pathogenesis. Different technologies have been developed to examine the distribution of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) in specific sequences of the genome. Recently, substantial amounts of 5-hyd...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20371518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq223 |
_version_ | 1782182622760271872 |
---|---|
author | Jin, Seung-Gi Kadam, Swati Pfeifer, Gerd P. |
author_facet | Jin, Seung-Gi Kadam, Swati Pfeifer, Gerd P. |
author_sort | Jin, Seung-Gi |
collection | PubMed |
description | DNA cytosine-5 methylation is a well-studied epigenetic pathway implicated in gene expression control and disease pathogenesis. Different technologies have been developed to examine the distribution of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) in specific sequences of the genome. Recently, substantial amounts of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), most likely derived from enzymatic oxidation of 5mC by TET1, have been detected in certain mammalian tissues. Here, we have examined the ability of several commonly used DNA methylation profiling methods to distinguish between 5mC and 5hmC. We show that techniques based on sodium bisulfite treatment of DNA are incapable of distinguishing between the two modified bases. In contrast, techniques based on immunoprecipitation with anti-5mC antibody (methylated DNA immunoprecipitation, MeDIP) or those based on proteins that bind to methylated CpG sequences (e.g. methylated-CpG island recovery assay, MIRA) do not detect 5hmC and are specific for 5mC unless both modified bases occur in the same DNA fragment. We also report that several methyl-CpG binding proteins including MBD1, MBD2 and MBD4 do not bind to sequences containing 5hmC. Selective mapping of 5hmC will require the development of unique tools for the detection of this modified base. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2887978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28879782010-06-22 Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine Jin, Seung-Gi Kadam, Swati Pfeifer, Gerd P. Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online DNA cytosine-5 methylation is a well-studied epigenetic pathway implicated in gene expression control and disease pathogenesis. Different technologies have been developed to examine the distribution of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) in specific sequences of the genome. Recently, substantial amounts of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), most likely derived from enzymatic oxidation of 5mC by TET1, have been detected in certain mammalian tissues. Here, we have examined the ability of several commonly used DNA methylation profiling methods to distinguish between 5mC and 5hmC. We show that techniques based on sodium bisulfite treatment of DNA are incapable of distinguishing between the two modified bases. In contrast, techniques based on immunoprecipitation with anti-5mC antibody (methylated DNA immunoprecipitation, MeDIP) or those based on proteins that bind to methylated CpG sequences (e.g. methylated-CpG island recovery assay, MIRA) do not detect 5hmC and are specific for 5mC unless both modified bases occur in the same DNA fragment. We also report that several methyl-CpG binding proteins including MBD1, MBD2 and MBD4 do not bind to sequences containing 5hmC. Selective mapping of 5hmC will require the development of unique tools for the detection of this modified base. Oxford University Press 2010-06 2010-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2887978/ /pubmed/20371518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq223 Text en © The Author(s) 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Online Jin, Seung-Gi Kadam, Swati Pfeifer, Gerd P. Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine |
title | Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine |
title_full | Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine |
title_fullStr | Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine |
title_full_unstemmed | Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine |
title_short | Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine |
title_sort | examination of the specificity of dna methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine |
topic | Methods Online |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20371518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinseunggi examinationofthespecificityofdnamethylationprofilingtechniquestowards5methylcytosineand5hydroxymethylcytosine AT kadamswati examinationofthespecificityofdnamethylationprofilingtechniquestowards5methylcytosineand5hydroxymethylcytosine AT pfeifergerdp examinationofthespecificityofdnamethylationprofilingtechniquestowards5methylcytosineand5hydroxymethylcytosine |