Cargando…

Role of PKR and Type I IFNs in Viral Control during Primary and Secondary Infection

Type I interferons (IFNs) are known to mediate viral control, and also promote survival and expansion of virus-specific CD8(+) T cells. However, it is unclear whether signaling cascades involved in eliciting these diverse cellular effects are also distinct. One of the best-characterized anti-viral s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakayama, Yumi, Plisch, Erin H., Sullivan, Jeremy, Thomas, Chester, Czuprynski, Charles J., Williams, Bryan R. G., Suresh, M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20585572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000966
_version_ 1782182909237526528
author Nakayama, Yumi
Plisch, Erin H.
Sullivan, Jeremy
Thomas, Chester
Czuprynski, Charles J.
Williams, Bryan R. G.
Suresh, M.
author_facet Nakayama, Yumi
Plisch, Erin H.
Sullivan, Jeremy
Thomas, Chester
Czuprynski, Charles J.
Williams, Bryan R. G.
Suresh, M.
author_sort Nakayama, Yumi
collection PubMed
description Type I interferons (IFNs) are known to mediate viral control, and also promote survival and expansion of virus-specific CD8(+) T cells. However, it is unclear whether signaling cascades involved in eliciting these diverse cellular effects are also distinct. One of the best-characterized anti-viral signaling mechanisms of Type I IFNs is mediated by the IFN-inducible dsRNA activated protein kinase, PKR. Here, we have investigated the role of PKR and Type I IFNs in regulating viral clearance and CD8(+) T cell response during primary and secondary viral infections. Our studies demonstrate differential requirement for PKR, in viral control versus elicitation of CD8(+) T cell responses during primary infection of mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). PKR-deficient mice mounted potent CD8(+) T cell responses, but failed to effectively control LCMV. The compromised LCMV control in the absence of PKR was multifactorial, and linked to less effective CD8(+) T cell-mediated viral suppression, enhanced viral replication in cells, and lower steady state expression levels of IFN-responsive genes. Moreover, we show that despite normal expansion of memory CD8(+) T cells and differentiation into effectors during a secondary response, effective clearance of LCMV but not vaccinia virus required PKR activity in infected cells. In the absence of Type I IFN signaling, secondary effector CD8(+) T cells were ineffective in controlling both LCMV and vaccinia virus replication in vivo. These findings provide insight into cellular pathways of Type I IFN actions, and highlight the under-appreciated importance of innate immune mechanisms of viral control during secondary infections, despite the accelerated responses of memory CD8(+) T cells. Additionally, the results presented here have furthered our understanding of the immune correlates of anti-viral protective immunity, which have implications in the rational design of vaccines.
format Text
id pubmed-2891951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28919512010-06-28 Role of PKR and Type I IFNs in Viral Control during Primary and Secondary Infection Nakayama, Yumi Plisch, Erin H. Sullivan, Jeremy Thomas, Chester Czuprynski, Charles J. Williams, Bryan R. G. Suresh, M. PLoS Pathog Research Article Type I interferons (IFNs) are known to mediate viral control, and also promote survival and expansion of virus-specific CD8(+) T cells. However, it is unclear whether signaling cascades involved in eliciting these diverse cellular effects are also distinct. One of the best-characterized anti-viral signaling mechanisms of Type I IFNs is mediated by the IFN-inducible dsRNA activated protein kinase, PKR. Here, we have investigated the role of PKR and Type I IFNs in regulating viral clearance and CD8(+) T cell response during primary and secondary viral infections. Our studies demonstrate differential requirement for PKR, in viral control versus elicitation of CD8(+) T cell responses during primary infection of mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). PKR-deficient mice mounted potent CD8(+) T cell responses, but failed to effectively control LCMV. The compromised LCMV control in the absence of PKR was multifactorial, and linked to less effective CD8(+) T cell-mediated viral suppression, enhanced viral replication in cells, and lower steady state expression levels of IFN-responsive genes. Moreover, we show that despite normal expansion of memory CD8(+) T cells and differentiation into effectors during a secondary response, effective clearance of LCMV but not vaccinia virus required PKR activity in infected cells. In the absence of Type I IFN signaling, secondary effector CD8(+) T cells were ineffective in controlling both LCMV and vaccinia virus replication in vivo. These findings provide insight into cellular pathways of Type I IFN actions, and highlight the under-appreciated importance of innate immune mechanisms of viral control during secondary infections, despite the accelerated responses of memory CD8(+) T cells. Additionally, the results presented here have furthered our understanding of the immune correlates of anti-viral protective immunity, which have implications in the rational design of vaccines. Public Library of Science 2010-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2891951/ /pubmed/20585572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000966 Text en Nakayama et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nakayama, Yumi
Plisch, Erin H.
Sullivan, Jeremy
Thomas, Chester
Czuprynski, Charles J.
Williams, Bryan R. G.
Suresh, M.
Role of PKR and Type I IFNs in Viral Control during Primary and Secondary Infection
title Role of PKR and Type I IFNs in Viral Control during Primary and Secondary Infection
title_full Role of PKR and Type I IFNs in Viral Control during Primary and Secondary Infection
title_fullStr Role of PKR and Type I IFNs in Viral Control during Primary and Secondary Infection
title_full_unstemmed Role of PKR and Type I IFNs in Viral Control during Primary and Secondary Infection
title_short Role of PKR and Type I IFNs in Viral Control during Primary and Secondary Infection
title_sort role of pkr and type i ifns in viral control during primary and secondary infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20585572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000966
work_keys_str_mv AT nakayamayumi roleofpkrandtypeiifnsinviralcontrolduringprimaryandsecondaryinfection
AT plischerinh roleofpkrandtypeiifnsinviralcontrolduringprimaryandsecondaryinfection
AT sullivanjeremy roleofpkrandtypeiifnsinviralcontrolduringprimaryandsecondaryinfection
AT thomaschester roleofpkrandtypeiifnsinviralcontrolduringprimaryandsecondaryinfection
AT czuprynskicharlesj roleofpkrandtypeiifnsinviralcontrolduringprimaryandsecondaryinfection
AT williamsbryanrg roleofpkrandtypeiifnsinviralcontrolduringprimaryandsecondaryinfection
AT sureshm roleofpkrandtypeiifnsinviralcontrolduringprimaryandsecondaryinfection