Cargando…

Quality control of inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli

BACKGROUND: Bacterial inclusion bodies (IBs) are key intermediates for protein production. Their quality affects the refolding yield and further purification. Recent functional and structural studies have revealed that IBs are not dead-end aggregates but undergo dynamic changes, including aggregatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jürgen, Britta, Breitenstein, Antje, Urlacher, Vlada, Büttner, Knut, Lin, Hongying, Hecker, Michael, Schweder, Thomas, Neubauer, Peter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2893105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20509924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-41
_version_ 1782183003675426816
author Jürgen, Britta
Breitenstein, Antje
Urlacher, Vlada
Büttner, Knut
Lin, Hongying
Hecker, Michael
Schweder, Thomas
Neubauer, Peter
author_facet Jürgen, Britta
Breitenstein, Antje
Urlacher, Vlada
Büttner, Knut
Lin, Hongying
Hecker, Michael
Schweder, Thomas
Neubauer, Peter
author_sort Jürgen, Britta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacterial inclusion bodies (IBs) are key intermediates for protein production. Their quality affects the refolding yield and further purification. Recent functional and structural studies have revealed that IBs are not dead-end aggregates but undergo dynamic changes, including aggregation, refunctionalization of the protein and proteolysis. Both, aggregation of the folding intermediates and turnover of IBs are influenced by the cellular situation and a number of well-studied chaperones and proteases are included. IBs mostly contain only minor impurities and are relatively homogenous. RESULTS: IBs of α-glucosidase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae after overproduction in Escherichia coli contain a large amount of (at least 12 different) major product fragments, as revealed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D PAGE). Matrix-Assisted-Laser-Desorption/Ionization-Time-Of-Flight Mass-Spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) identification showed that these fragments contain either the N- or the C-terminus of the protein, therefore indicate that these IBs are at least partially created by proteolytic action. Expression of α-glucosidase in single knockout mutants for the major proteases ClpP, Lon, OmpT and FtsH which are known to be involved in the heat shock like response to production of recombinant proteins or to the degradation of IB proteins, clpP, lon, ompT, and ftsH did not influence the fragment pattern or the composition of the IBs. The quality of the IBs was also not influenced by the sampling time, cultivation medium (complex and mineral salt medium), production strategy (shake flask, fed-batch fermentation process), production strength (T5-lac or T7 promoter), strain background (K-12 or BL21), or addition of different protease inhibitors during IB preparation. CONCLUSIONS: α-glucosidase is fragmented before aggregation, but neither by proteolytic action on the IBs by the common major proteases, nor during downstream IB preparation. Different fragments co-aggregate in the process of IB formation together with the full-length product. Other intracellular proteases than ClpP or Lon must be responsible for fragmentation. Reaggregation of protease-stable α-glucosidase fragments during in situ disintegration of the existing IBs does not seem to occur.
format Text
id pubmed-2893105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28931052010-06-29 Quality control of inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli Jürgen, Britta Breitenstein, Antje Urlacher, Vlada Büttner, Knut Lin, Hongying Hecker, Michael Schweder, Thomas Neubauer, Peter Microb Cell Fact Research BACKGROUND: Bacterial inclusion bodies (IBs) are key intermediates for protein production. Their quality affects the refolding yield and further purification. Recent functional and structural studies have revealed that IBs are not dead-end aggregates but undergo dynamic changes, including aggregation, refunctionalization of the protein and proteolysis. Both, aggregation of the folding intermediates and turnover of IBs are influenced by the cellular situation and a number of well-studied chaperones and proteases are included. IBs mostly contain only minor impurities and are relatively homogenous. RESULTS: IBs of α-glucosidase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae after overproduction in Escherichia coli contain a large amount of (at least 12 different) major product fragments, as revealed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D PAGE). Matrix-Assisted-Laser-Desorption/Ionization-Time-Of-Flight Mass-Spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) identification showed that these fragments contain either the N- or the C-terminus of the protein, therefore indicate that these IBs are at least partially created by proteolytic action. Expression of α-glucosidase in single knockout mutants for the major proteases ClpP, Lon, OmpT and FtsH which are known to be involved in the heat shock like response to production of recombinant proteins or to the degradation of IB proteins, clpP, lon, ompT, and ftsH did not influence the fragment pattern or the composition of the IBs. The quality of the IBs was also not influenced by the sampling time, cultivation medium (complex and mineral salt medium), production strategy (shake flask, fed-batch fermentation process), production strength (T5-lac or T7 promoter), strain background (K-12 or BL21), or addition of different protease inhibitors during IB preparation. CONCLUSIONS: α-glucosidase is fragmented before aggregation, but neither by proteolytic action on the IBs by the common major proteases, nor during downstream IB preparation. Different fragments co-aggregate in the process of IB formation together with the full-length product. Other intracellular proteases than ClpP or Lon must be responsible for fragmentation. Reaggregation of protease-stable α-glucosidase fragments during in situ disintegration of the existing IBs does not seem to occur. BioMed Central 2010-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2893105/ /pubmed/20509924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-41 Text en Copyright ©2010 Jürgen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jürgen, Britta
Breitenstein, Antje
Urlacher, Vlada
Büttner, Knut
Lin, Hongying
Hecker, Michael
Schweder, Thomas
Neubauer, Peter
Quality control of inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli
title Quality control of inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli
title_full Quality control of inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli
title_fullStr Quality control of inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli
title_full_unstemmed Quality control of inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli
title_short Quality control of inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli
title_sort quality control of inclusion bodies in escherichia coli
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2893105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20509924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-41
work_keys_str_mv AT jurgenbritta qualitycontrolofinclusionbodiesinescherichiacoli
AT breitensteinantje qualitycontrolofinclusionbodiesinescherichiacoli
AT urlachervlada qualitycontrolofinclusionbodiesinescherichiacoli
AT buttnerknut qualitycontrolofinclusionbodiesinescherichiacoli
AT linhongying qualitycontrolofinclusionbodiesinescherichiacoli
AT heckermichael qualitycontrolofinclusionbodiesinescherichiacoli
AT schwederthomas qualitycontrolofinclusionbodiesinescherichiacoli
AT neubauerpeter qualitycontrolofinclusionbodiesinescherichiacoli