Cargando…
Bioequivalence of the 4-mg Oral Granules and Chewable Tablet Formulations of Montelukast
PURPOSE: The primary objective of the studies was to demonstrate bioequivalence between the oral granules formulation and chewable tablet of montelukast in the fasted state. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the oral granules was also evaluated. METHODS: The Formulation Biocomparison Study (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Inc
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2913109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20686624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2010.00029.x |
_version_ | 1782184661153218560 |
---|---|
author | Knorr, Barbara Hartford, Alan Li, Xiujiang (Susie) Yang, Amy Yifan Noonan, Gertrude Migoya, Elizabeth |
author_facet | Knorr, Barbara Hartford, Alan Li, Xiujiang (Susie) Yang, Amy Yifan Noonan, Gertrude Migoya, Elizabeth |
author_sort | Knorr, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The primary objective of the studies was to demonstrate bioequivalence between the oral granules formulation and chewable tablet of montelukast in the fasted state. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the oral granules was also evaluated. METHODS: The Formulation Biocomparison Study (Study 1) and the Final Market Image Study (Study 2) each used an open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover design where healthy adult subjects (N = 24 and 30, respectively) received montelukast as a single 4-mg dose of the oral granules formulation and a 4-mg chewable tablet fasted, and a single 4-mg dose of the oral granules formulation with food (on 2 teaspoons of applesauce [Study 1] or after consumption of a high-fat breakfast [Study 2]). The formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (oral granules/chewable tablet) for the AUC(0-∞) and C(max) of montelukast were within the prespecified comparability bounds of (0.80, 1.25). For the food-effect assessment in Study 1, comparability bounds were prespecified as (0.50, 2.00) only for the 90% CI of the GMR (oral granules fed/oral granules fasted) for the AUC(0-∞) of montelukast; the 90% CI of the GMR for the C(max) of montelukast, however, also was computed. In Study 2, 90% CIs of the GMRs (oral granules fed/oral granules fasted) for the AUC(0-∞) and C(max) of montelukast were computed; comparability bounds were not prespecified. RESULTS: Comparing the exposure of the formulations, the 90% CIs of the GMRs for AUC(0-∞) and C(max) were within the prespecified bound of (0.80, 1.25). For AUC(0-∞), the GMRs (90% CI) for Study 1 and Study 2 were 1.01 (0.92, 1.11) and 0.95 (0.91, 0.99), respectively. For C(max), respective values were 0.99 (0.86, 1.13) and 0.92 (0.84, 1.01). When the oral granules formulation was administered with food, 90% CIs of the GMRs for both AUC(0-∞) and C(max) in both studies were contained within the interval of (0.50, 2.00). CONCLUSIONS: The 4-mg oral granules and 4-mg chewable tablet formulations of montelukast administered in the fasted state are bioequivalent. Single 4-mg doses of the oral granules formulation and the chewable tablet of montelukast are generally well tolerated. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2913109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29131092010-08-03 Bioequivalence of the 4-mg Oral Granules and Chewable Tablet Formulations of Montelukast Knorr, Barbara Hartford, Alan Li, Xiujiang (Susie) Yang, Amy Yifan Noonan, Gertrude Migoya, Elizabeth Arch Drug Inf Original Article PURPOSE: The primary objective of the studies was to demonstrate bioequivalence between the oral granules formulation and chewable tablet of montelukast in the fasted state. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the oral granules was also evaluated. METHODS: The Formulation Biocomparison Study (Study 1) and the Final Market Image Study (Study 2) each used an open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover design where healthy adult subjects (N = 24 and 30, respectively) received montelukast as a single 4-mg dose of the oral granules formulation and a 4-mg chewable tablet fasted, and a single 4-mg dose of the oral granules formulation with food (on 2 teaspoons of applesauce [Study 1] or after consumption of a high-fat breakfast [Study 2]). The formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (oral granules/chewable tablet) for the AUC(0-∞) and C(max) of montelukast were within the prespecified comparability bounds of (0.80, 1.25). For the food-effect assessment in Study 1, comparability bounds were prespecified as (0.50, 2.00) only for the 90% CI of the GMR (oral granules fed/oral granules fasted) for the AUC(0-∞) of montelukast; the 90% CI of the GMR for the C(max) of montelukast, however, also was computed. In Study 2, 90% CIs of the GMRs (oral granules fed/oral granules fasted) for the AUC(0-∞) and C(max) of montelukast were computed; comparability bounds were not prespecified. RESULTS: Comparing the exposure of the formulations, the 90% CIs of the GMRs for AUC(0-∞) and C(max) were within the prespecified bound of (0.80, 1.25). For AUC(0-∞), the GMRs (90% CI) for Study 1 and Study 2 were 1.01 (0.92, 1.11) and 0.95 (0.91, 0.99), respectively. For C(max), respective values were 0.99 (0.86, 1.13) and 0.92 (0.84, 1.01). When the oral granules formulation was administered with food, 90% CIs of the GMRs for both AUC(0-∞) and C(max) in both studies were contained within the interval of (0.50, 2.00). CONCLUSIONS: The 4-mg oral granules and 4-mg chewable tablet formulations of montelukast administered in the fasted state are bioequivalent. Single 4-mg doses of the oral granules formulation and the chewable tablet of montelukast are generally well tolerated. Blackwell Publishing Inc 2010-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2913109/ /pubmed/20686624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2010.00029.x Text en © 2010, Archives of Drug Information http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Knorr, Barbara Hartford, Alan Li, Xiujiang (Susie) Yang, Amy Yifan Noonan, Gertrude Migoya, Elizabeth Bioequivalence of the 4-mg Oral Granules and Chewable Tablet Formulations of Montelukast |
title | Bioequivalence of the 4-mg Oral Granules and Chewable Tablet Formulations of Montelukast |
title_full | Bioequivalence of the 4-mg Oral Granules and Chewable Tablet Formulations of Montelukast |
title_fullStr | Bioequivalence of the 4-mg Oral Granules and Chewable Tablet Formulations of Montelukast |
title_full_unstemmed | Bioequivalence of the 4-mg Oral Granules and Chewable Tablet Formulations of Montelukast |
title_short | Bioequivalence of the 4-mg Oral Granules and Chewable Tablet Formulations of Montelukast |
title_sort | bioequivalence of the 4-mg oral granules and chewable tablet formulations of montelukast |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2913109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20686624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2010.00029.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knorrbarbara bioequivalenceofthe4mgoralgranulesandchewabletabletformulationsofmontelukast AT hartfordalan bioequivalenceofthe4mgoralgranulesandchewabletabletformulationsofmontelukast AT lixiujiangsusie bioequivalenceofthe4mgoralgranulesandchewabletabletformulationsofmontelukast AT yangamyyifan bioequivalenceofthe4mgoralgranulesandchewabletabletformulationsofmontelukast AT noonangertrude bioequivalenceofthe4mgoralgranulesandchewabletabletformulationsofmontelukast AT migoyaelizabeth bioequivalenceofthe4mgoralgranulesandchewabletabletformulationsofmontelukast |