Cargando…
Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what?
Recently, two large randomized controlled trials of distinct biologic therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus, B-cell depletion with rituximab and co-stimulatory blockade with CTLA4Ig (abatacept), failed to meet primary endpoints. Given the great need for new treatments in lupus, these results wer...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicine Reports Ltd
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20948753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/M1-28 |
_version_ | 1782185621459042304 |
---|---|
author | Coca, Andreea Anolik, Jennifer H |
author_facet | Coca, Andreea Anolik, Jennifer H |
author_sort | Coca, Andreea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, two large randomized controlled trials of distinct biologic therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus, B-cell depletion with rituximab and co-stimulatory blockade with CTLA4Ig (abatacept), failed to meet primary endpoints. Given the great need for new treatments in lupus, these results were met with disappointment and have left the rheumatology and immunology community searching for an explanation. Are these experimental agents ineffective in lupus or are there trial design issues or other considerations? In this commentary, we discuss our perspective on these results within the context of current understanding of the pathophysiology of lupus and the mechanism of action of biologic therapies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2924714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Medicine Reports Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29247142010-10-14 Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what? Coca, Andreea Anolik, Jennifer H F1000 Med Rep Review Article Recently, two large randomized controlled trials of distinct biologic therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus, B-cell depletion with rituximab and co-stimulatory blockade with CTLA4Ig (abatacept), failed to meet primary endpoints. Given the great need for new treatments in lupus, these results were met with disappointment and have left the rheumatology and immunology community searching for an explanation. Are these experimental agents ineffective in lupus or are there trial design issues or other considerations? In this commentary, we discuss our perspective on these results within the context of current understanding of the pathophysiology of lupus and the mechanism of action of biologic therapies. Medicine Reports Ltd 2009-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2924714/ /pubmed/20948753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/M1-28 Text en © 2009 Medicine Reports Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use this work for commercial purposes |
spellingShingle | Review Article Coca, Andreea Anolik, Jennifer H Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what? |
title | Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what? |
title_full | Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what? |
title_fullStr | Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what? |
title_full_unstemmed | Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what? |
title_short | Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what? |
title_sort | two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20948753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/M1-28 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cocaandreea twonegativerandomizedcontrolledtrialsinlupusnowwhat AT anolikjenniferh twonegativerandomizedcontrolledtrialsinlupusnowwhat |