Cargando…

Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what?

Recently, two large randomized controlled trials of distinct biologic therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus, B-cell depletion with rituximab and co-stimulatory blockade with CTLA4Ig (abatacept), failed to meet primary endpoints. Given the great need for new treatments in lupus, these results wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coca, Andreea, Anolik, Jennifer H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicine Reports Ltd 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20948753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/M1-28
_version_ 1782185621459042304
author Coca, Andreea
Anolik, Jennifer H
author_facet Coca, Andreea
Anolik, Jennifer H
author_sort Coca, Andreea
collection PubMed
description Recently, two large randomized controlled trials of distinct biologic therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus, B-cell depletion with rituximab and co-stimulatory blockade with CTLA4Ig (abatacept), failed to meet primary endpoints. Given the great need for new treatments in lupus, these results were met with disappointment and have left the rheumatology and immunology community searching for an explanation. Are these experimental agents ineffective in lupus or are there trial design issues or other considerations? In this commentary, we discuss our perspective on these results within the context of current understanding of the pathophysiology of lupus and the mechanism of action of biologic therapies.
format Text
id pubmed-2924714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medicine Reports Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29247142010-10-14 Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what? Coca, Andreea Anolik, Jennifer H F1000 Med Rep Review Article Recently, two large randomized controlled trials of distinct biologic therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus, B-cell depletion with rituximab and co-stimulatory blockade with CTLA4Ig (abatacept), failed to meet primary endpoints. Given the great need for new treatments in lupus, these results were met with disappointment and have left the rheumatology and immunology community searching for an explanation. Are these experimental agents ineffective in lupus or are there trial design issues or other considerations? In this commentary, we discuss our perspective on these results within the context of current understanding of the pathophysiology of lupus and the mechanism of action of biologic therapies. Medicine Reports Ltd 2009-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2924714/ /pubmed/20948753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/M1-28 Text en © 2009 Medicine Reports Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use this work for commercial purposes
spellingShingle Review Article
Coca, Andreea
Anolik, Jennifer H
Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what?
title Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what?
title_full Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what?
title_fullStr Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what?
title_full_unstemmed Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what?
title_short Two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what?
title_sort two negative randomized controlled trials in lupus: now what?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20948753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/M1-28
work_keys_str_mv AT cocaandreea twonegativerandomizedcontrolledtrialsinlupusnowwhat
AT anolikjenniferh twonegativerandomizedcontrolledtrialsinlupusnowwhat