Cargando…

Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)

BACKGROUND: The 3C-like protease (3CL(pro)) of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus is required for autoprocessing of the polyprotein, and is a potential target for treating coronaviral infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To obtain a thorough understanding of substrate specificity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chuck, Chi-Pang, Chong, Lin-Tat, Chen, Chao, Chow, Hak-Fun, Wan, David Chi-Cheong, Wong, Kam-Bo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2950840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20949131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013197
_version_ 1782187659602427904
author Chuck, Chi-Pang
Chong, Lin-Tat
Chen, Chao
Chow, Hak-Fun
Wan, David Chi-Cheong
Wong, Kam-Bo
author_facet Chuck, Chi-Pang
Chong, Lin-Tat
Chen, Chao
Chow, Hak-Fun
Wan, David Chi-Cheong
Wong, Kam-Bo
author_sort Chuck, Chi-Pang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 3C-like protease (3CL(pro)) of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus is required for autoprocessing of the polyprotein, and is a potential target for treating coronaviral infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To obtain a thorough understanding of substrate specificity of the protease, a substrate library of 19[Image: see text]8 variants was created by performing saturation mutagenesis on the autocleavage sequence at P5 to P3' positions. The substrate sequences were inserted between cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins so that the cleavage rates were monitored by in vitro fluorescence resonance energy transfer. The relative cleavage rate for different substrate sequences was correlated with various structural properties. P5 and P3 positions prefer residues with high β-sheet propensity; P4 prefers small hydrophobic residues; P2 prefers hydrophobic residues without β-branch. Gln is the best residue at P1 position, but observable cleavage can be detected with His and Met substitutions. P1' position prefers small residues, while P2' and P3' positions have no strong preference on residue substitutions. Noteworthy, solvent exposed sites such as P5, P3 and P3' positions favour positively charged residues over negatively charged one, suggesting that electrostatic interactions may play a role in catalysis. A super-active substrate, which combined the preferred residues at P5 to P1 positions, was found to have 2.8 fold higher activity than the wild-type sequence. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrated a strong structure-activity relationship between the 3CL(pro) and its substrate. The substrate specificity profiled in this study may provide insights into a rational design of peptidomimetic inhibitors.
format Text
id pubmed-2950840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29508402010-10-14 Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro) Chuck, Chi-Pang Chong, Lin-Tat Chen, Chao Chow, Hak-Fun Wan, David Chi-Cheong Wong, Kam-Bo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The 3C-like protease (3CL(pro)) of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus is required for autoprocessing of the polyprotein, and is a potential target for treating coronaviral infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To obtain a thorough understanding of substrate specificity of the protease, a substrate library of 19[Image: see text]8 variants was created by performing saturation mutagenesis on the autocleavage sequence at P5 to P3' positions. The substrate sequences were inserted between cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins so that the cleavage rates were monitored by in vitro fluorescence resonance energy transfer. The relative cleavage rate for different substrate sequences was correlated with various structural properties. P5 and P3 positions prefer residues with high β-sheet propensity; P4 prefers small hydrophobic residues; P2 prefers hydrophobic residues without β-branch. Gln is the best residue at P1 position, but observable cleavage can be detected with His and Met substitutions. P1' position prefers small residues, while P2' and P3' positions have no strong preference on residue substitutions. Noteworthy, solvent exposed sites such as P5, P3 and P3' positions favour positively charged residues over negatively charged one, suggesting that electrostatic interactions may play a role in catalysis. A super-active substrate, which combined the preferred residues at P5 to P1 positions, was found to have 2.8 fold higher activity than the wild-type sequence. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrated a strong structure-activity relationship between the 3CL(pro) and its substrate. The substrate specificity profiled in this study may provide insights into a rational design of peptidomimetic inhibitors. Public Library of Science 2010-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2950840/ /pubmed/20949131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013197 Text en Chuck et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chuck, Chi-Pang
Chong, Lin-Tat
Chen, Chao
Chow, Hak-Fun
Wan, David Chi-Cheong
Wong, Kam-Bo
Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
title Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
title_full Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
title_fullStr Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
title_full_unstemmed Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
title_short Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
title_sort profiling of substrate specificity of sars-cov 3cl(pro)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2950840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20949131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013197
work_keys_str_mv AT chuckchipang profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro
AT chonglintat profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro
AT chenchao profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro
AT chowhakfun profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro
AT wandavidchicheong profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro
AT wongkambo profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro