Cargando…
Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
BACKGROUND: The 3C-like protease (3CL(pro)) of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus is required for autoprocessing of the polyprotein, and is a potential target for treating coronaviral infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To obtain a thorough understanding of substrate specificity of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2950840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20949131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013197 |
_version_ | 1782187659602427904 |
---|---|
author | Chuck, Chi-Pang Chong, Lin-Tat Chen, Chao Chow, Hak-Fun Wan, David Chi-Cheong Wong, Kam-Bo |
author_facet | Chuck, Chi-Pang Chong, Lin-Tat Chen, Chao Chow, Hak-Fun Wan, David Chi-Cheong Wong, Kam-Bo |
author_sort | Chuck, Chi-Pang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 3C-like protease (3CL(pro)) of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus is required for autoprocessing of the polyprotein, and is a potential target for treating coronaviral infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To obtain a thorough understanding of substrate specificity of the protease, a substrate library of 19[Image: see text]8 variants was created by performing saturation mutagenesis on the autocleavage sequence at P5 to P3' positions. The substrate sequences were inserted between cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins so that the cleavage rates were monitored by in vitro fluorescence resonance energy transfer. The relative cleavage rate for different substrate sequences was correlated with various structural properties. P5 and P3 positions prefer residues with high β-sheet propensity; P4 prefers small hydrophobic residues; P2 prefers hydrophobic residues without β-branch. Gln is the best residue at P1 position, but observable cleavage can be detected with His and Met substitutions. P1' position prefers small residues, while P2' and P3' positions have no strong preference on residue substitutions. Noteworthy, solvent exposed sites such as P5, P3 and P3' positions favour positively charged residues over negatively charged one, suggesting that electrostatic interactions may play a role in catalysis. A super-active substrate, which combined the preferred residues at P5 to P1 positions, was found to have 2.8 fold higher activity than the wild-type sequence. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrated a strong structure-activity relationship between the 3CL(pro) and its substrate. The substrate specificity profiled in this study may provide insights into a rational design of peptidomimetic inhibitors. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2950840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29508402010-10-14 Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro) Chuck, Chi-Pang Chong, Lin-Tat Chen, Chao Chow, Hak-Fun Wan, David Chi-Cheong Wong, Kam-Bo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The 3C-like protease (3CL(pro)) of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus is required for autoprocessing of the polyprotein, and is a potential target for treating coronaviral infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To obtain a thorough understanding of substrate specificity of the protease, a substrate library of 19[Image: see text]8 variants was created by performing saturation mutagenesis on the autocleavage sequence at P5 to P3' positions. The substrate sequences were inserted between cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins so that the cleavage rates were monitored by in vitro fluorescence resonance energy transfer. The relative cleavage rate for different substrate sequences was correlated with various structural properties. P5 and P3 positions prefer residues with high β-sheet propensity; P4 prefers small hydrophobic residues; P2 prefers hydrophobic residues without β-branch. Gln is the best residue at P1 position, but observable cleavage can be detected with His and Met substitutions. P1' position prefers small residues, while P2' and P3' positions have no strong preference on residue substitutions. Noteworthy, solvent exposed sites such as P5, P3 and P3' positions favour positively charged residues over negatively charged one, suggesting that electrostatic interactions may play a role in catalysis. A super-active substrate, which combined the preferred residues at P5 to P1 positions, was found to have 2.8 fold higher activity than the wild-type sequence. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrated a strong structure-activity relationship between the 3CL(pro) and its substrate. The substrate specificity profiled in this study may provide insights into a rational design of peptidomimetic inhibitors. Public Library of Science 2010-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2950840/ /pubmed/20949131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013197 Text en Chuck et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chuck, Chi-Pang Chong, Lin-Tat Chen, Chao Chow, Hak-Fun Wan, David Chi-Cheong Wong, Kam-Bo Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro) |
title | Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
|
title_full | Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
|
title_fullStr | Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
|
title_full_unstemmed | Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
|
title_short | Profiling of Substrate Specificity of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro)
|
title_sort | profiling of substrate specificity of sars-cov 3cl(pro) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2950840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20949131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chuckchipang profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro AT chonglintat profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro AT chenchao profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro AT chowhakfun profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro AT wandavidchicheong profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro AT wongkambo profilingofsubstratespecificityofsarscov3clpro |