Cargando…
THE RELEVANCE TO META-ANALYSIS, SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION TO CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
Traditional review articles provide clinicians with syntheses of the medical literature but are criticised as being haphazard in their methodology and biased in their conclusions. Systematic reviews use rigorous methods to minimise bias and statistical methods to synthesise results (meta-analysis) t...
Autor principal: | Tharyan, Prathap |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
1998
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2965837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21494461 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How the Cochrane Collaboration Is Responding to the Asian Tsunami
por: Tharyan, Prathap, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Evaluating systematic reviews in urology: A practical guide
por: Tharyan, Prathap
Publicado: (2007) -
Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
por: McKenzie, Joanne E, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Budesonide for the Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Crohn’s Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Kuenzig, M Ellen, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)