Cargando…

Thermodynamic modeling of transcription: sensitivity analysis differentiates biological mechanism from mathematical model-induced effects

BACKGROUND: Quantitative models of gene expression generate parameter values that can shed light on biological features such as transcription factor activity, cooperativity, and local effects of repressors. An important element in such investigations is sensitivity analysis, which determines how str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dresch, Jacqueline M, Liu, Xiaozhou, Arnosti, David N, Ay, Ahmet
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20969803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-142
_version_ 1782192176228204544
author Dresch, Jacqueline M
Liu, Xiaozhou
Arnosti, David N
Ay, Ahmet
author_facet Dresch, Jacqueline M
Liu, Xiaozhou
Arnosti, David N
Ay, Ahmet
author_sort Dresch, Jacqueline M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantitative models of gene expression generate parameter values that can shed light on biological features such as transcription factor activity, cooperativity, and local effects of repressors. An important element in such investigations is sensitivity analysis, which determines how strongly a model's output reacts to variations in parameter values. Parameters of low sensitivity may not be accurately estimated, leading to unwarranted conclusions. Low sensitivity may reflect the nature of the biological data, or it may be a result of the model structure. Here, we focus on the analysis of thermodynamic models, which have been used extensively to analyze gene transcription. Extracted parameter values have been interpreted biologically, but until now little attention has been given to parameter sensitivity in this context. RESULTS: We apply local and global sensitivity analyses to two recent transcriptional models to determine the sensitivity of individual parameters. We show that in one case, values for repressor efficiencies are very sensitive, while values for protein cooperativities are not, and provide insights on why these differential sensitivities stem from both biological effects and the structure of the applied models. In a second case, we demonstrate that parameters that were thought to prove the system's dependence on activator-activator cooperativity are relatively insensitive. We show that there are numerous parameter sets that do not satisfy the relationships proferred as the optimal solutions, indicating that structural differences between the two types of transcriptional enhancers analyzed may not be as simple as altered activator cooperativity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the need for sensitivity analysis to examine model construction and forms of biological data used for modeling transcriptional processes, in order to determine the significance of estimated parameter values for thermodynamic models. Knowledge of parameter sensitivities can provide the necessary context to determine how modeling results should be interpreted in biological systems.
format Text
id pubmed-2987881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29878812010-11-23 Thermodynamic modeling of transcription: sensitivity analysis differentiates biological mechanism from mathematical model-induced effects Dresch, Jacqueline M Liu, Xiaozhou Arnosti, David N Ay, Ahmet BMC Syst Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Quantitative models of gene expression generate parameter values that can shed light on biological features such as transcription factor activity, cooperativity, and local effects of repressors. An important element in such investigations is sensitivity analysis, which determines how strongly a model's output reacts to variations in parameter values. Parameters of low sensitivity may not be accurately estimated, leading to unwarranted conclusions. Low sensitivity may reflect the nature of the biological data, or it may be a result of the model structure. Here, we focus on the analysis of thermodynamic models, which have been used extensively to analyze gene transcription. Extracted parameter values have been interpreted biologically, but until now little attention has been given to parameter sensitivity in this context. RESULTS: We apply local and global sensitivity analyses to two recent transcriptional models to determine the sensitivity of individual parameters. We show that in one case, values for repressor efficiencies are very sensitive, while values for protein cooperativities are not, and provide insights on why these differential sensitivities stem from both biological effects and the structure of the applied models. In a second case, we demonstrate that parameters that were thought to prove the system's dependence on activator-activator cooperativity are relatively insensitive. We show that there are numerous parameter sets that do not satisfy the relationships proferred as the optimal solutions, indicating that structural differences between the two types of transcriptional enhancers analyzed may not be as simple as altered activator cooperativity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the need for sensitivity analysis to examine model construction and forms of biological data used for modeling transcriptional processes, in order to determine the significance of estimated parameter values for thermodynamic models. Knowledge of parameter sensitivities can provide the necessary context to determine how modeling results should be interpreted in biological systems. BioMed Central 2010-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2987881/ /pubmed/20969803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-142 Text en Copyright ©2010 Dresch et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dresch, Jacqueline M
Liu, Xiaozhou
Arnosti, David N
Ay, Ahmet
Thermodynamic modeling of transcription: sensitivity analysis differentiates biological mechanism from mathematical model-induced effects
title Thermodynamic modeling of transcription: sensitivity analysis differentiates biological mechanism from mathematical model-induced effects
title_full Thermodynamic modeling of transcription: sensitivity analysis differentiates biological mechanism from mathematical model-induced effects
title_fullStr Thermodynamic modeling of transcription: sensitivity analysis differentiates biological mechanism from mathematical model-induced effects
title_full_unstemmed Thermodynamic modeling of transcription: sensitivity analysis differentiates biological mechanism from mathematical model-induced effects
title_short Thermodynamic modeling of transcription: sensitivity analysis differentiates biological mechanism from mathematical model-induced effects
title_sort thermodynamic modeling of transcription: sensitivity analysis differentiates biological mechanism from mathematical model-induced effects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20969803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-142
work_keys_str_mv AT dreschjacquelinem thermodynamicmodelingoftranscriptionsensitivityanalysisdifferentiatesbiologicalmechanismfrommathematicalmodelinducedeffects
AT liuxiaozhou thermodynamicmodelingoftranscriptionsensitivityanalysisdifferentiatesbiologicalmechanismfrommathematicalmodelinducedeffects
AT arnostidavidn thermodynamicmodelingoftranscriptionsensitivityanalysisdifferentiatesbiologicalmechanismfrommathematicalmodelinducedeffects
AT ayahmet thermodynamicmodelingoftranscriptionsensitivityanalysisdifferentiatesbiologicalmechanismfrommathematicalmodelinducedeffects