Cargando…

Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places

OBJECTIVE: To compare air nicotine concentrations according to the smoking policy selected by bars/restaurants in Santiago, Chile before and after the enactment of partial smoking ban legislation in 2007 (establishments could be smoke free, have segregated (mixed) smoking and non-smoking areas, or a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erazo, Marcia, Iglesias, Veronica, Droppelmann, Andrea, Acuña, Marisol, Peruga, Armando, Breysse, Patrick N, Navas-Acien, Ana
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20798021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.035402
_version_ 1782192552234975232
author Erazo, Marcia
Iglesias, Veronica
Droppelmann, Andrea
Acuña, Marisol
Peruga, Armando
Breysse, Patrick N
Navas-Acien, Ana
author_facet Erazo, Marcia
Iglesias, Veronica
Droppelmann, Andrea
Acuña, Marisol
Peruga, Armando
Breysse, Patrick N
Navas-Acien, Ana
author_sort Erazo, Marcia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare air nicotine concentrations according to the smoking policy selected by bars/restaurants in Santiago, Chile before and after the enactment of partial smoking ban legislation in 2007 (establishments could be smoke free, have segregated (mixed) smoking and non-smoking areas, or allow smoking in all areas). METHODS: The study measured air nicotine concentrations over 7 days to characterise secondhand smoke exposure in 30 bars/restaurants in 2008. Owner/manager interviews and physical inspections were conducted. RESULTS: Median IQR air nicotine concentrations measured in all venues were 4.38 (0.61–13.62) μg/m(3). Air nicotine concentrations were higher in bars (median 7.22, IQR 2.48–15.64 μg/m(3)) compared to restaurants (1.12, 0.15–9.22 μg/m(3)). By smoking status, nicotine concentrations were higher in smoking venues (13.46, 5.31–16.87 μg/m(3)), followed by smoking areas in mixed venues (9.22, 5.09–14.90 μg/m(3)) and non-smoking areas in mixed venues (0.99, 0.19–1.27 μg/m(3)). Air nicotine concentrations were markedly lower in smoke-free venues (0.12, 0.11–0.46 μg/m(3)). After adjustment for differences in volume and ventilation, air nicotine concentrations were 3.2, 35.5 and 56.2 times higher in non-smoking areas in mixed venues, smoking areas in mixed venues and smoking venues, respectively, compared to smoke-free venues. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to secondhand smoke remains high in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile. These findings demonstrate that the partial smoking ban legislation enacted in Chile in 2007 provides no protection to employees working in those venues. Enacting a comprehensive smoke-free legislation which protects all people from exposure to secondhand smoke in all public places and workplaces is urgently needed.
format Text
id pubmed-2991072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29910722010-12-10 Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places Erazo, Marcia Iglesias, Veronica Droppelmann, Andrea Acuña, Marisol Peruga, Armando Breysse, Patrick N Navas-Acien, Ana Tob Control Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To compare air nicotine concentrations according to the smoking policy selected by bars/restaurants in Santiago, Chile before and after the enactment of partial smoking ban legislation in 2007 (establishments could be smoke free, have segregated (mixed) smoking and non-smoking areas, or allow smoking in all areas). METHODS: The study measured air nicotine concentrations over 7 days to characterise secondhand smoke exposure in 30 bars/restaurants in 2008. Owner/manager interviews and physical inspections were conducted. RESULTS: Median IQR air nicotine concentrations measured in all venues were 4.38 (0.61–13.62) μg/m(3). Air nicotine concentrations were higher in bars (median 7.22, IQR 2.48–15.64 μg/m(3)) compared to restaurants (1.12, 0.15–9.22 μg/m(3)). By smoking status, nicotine concentrations were higher in smoking venues (13.46, 5.31–16.87 μg/m(3)), followed by smoking areas in mixed venues (9.22, 5.09–14.90 μg/m(3)) and non-smoking areas in mixed venues (0.99, 0.19–1.27 μg/m(3)). Air nicotine concentrations were markedly lower in smoke-free venues (0.12, 0.11–0.46 μg/m(3)). After adjustment for differences in volume and ventilation, air nicotine concentrations were 3.2, 35.5 and 56.2 times higher in non-smoking areas in mixed venues, smoking areas in mixed venues and smoking venues, respectively, compared to smoke-free venues. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to secondhand smoke remains high in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile. These findings demonstrate that the partial smoking ban legislation enacted in Chile in 2007 provides no protection to employees working in those venues. Enacting a comprehensive smoke-free legislation which protects all people from exposure to secondhand smoke in all public places and workplaces is urgently needed. BMJ Group 2010-08-25 2010-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2991072/ /pubmed/20798021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.035402 Text en © 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Erazo, Marcia
Iglesias, Veronica
Droppelmann, Andrea
Acuña, Marisol
Peruga, Armando
Breysse, Patrick N
Navas-Acien, Ana
Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places
title Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places
title_full Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places
title_fullStr Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places
title_full_unstemmed Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places
title_short Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places
title_sort secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in santiago, chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20798021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.035402
work_keys_str_mv AT erazomarcia secondhandtobaccosmokeinbarsandrestaurantsinsantiagochileevaluationofpartialsmokingbanlegislationinpublicplaces
AT iglesiasveronica secondhandtobaccosmokeinbarsandrestaurantsinsantiagochileevaluationofpartialsmokingbanlegislationinpublicplaces
AT droppelmannandrea secondhandtobaccosmokeinbarsandrestaurantsinsantiagochileevaluationofpartialsmokingbanlegislationinpublicplaces
AT acunamarisol secondhandtobaccosmokeinbarsandrestaurantsinsantiagochileevaluationofpartialsmokingbanlegislationinpublicplaces
AT perugaarmando secondhandtobaccosmokeinbarsandrestaurantsinsantiagochileevaluationofpartialsmokingbanlegislationinpublicplaces
AT breyssepatrickn secondhandtobaccosmokeinbarsandrestaurantsinsantiagochileevaluationofpartialsmokingbanlegislationinpublicplaces
AT navasacienana secondhandtobaccosmokeinbarsandrestaurantsinsantiagochileevaluationofpartialsmokingbanlegislationinpublicplaces