Cargando…

Designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits

BACKGROUND: One problem with engineered genetic circuits in synthetic microbes is their stability over evolutionary time in the absence of selective pressure. Since design of a selective environment for maintaining function of a circuit will be unique to every circuit, general design principles are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sleight, Sean C, Bartley, Bryan A, Lieviant, Jane A, Sauro, Herbert M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-4-12
_version_ 1782192578866708480
author Sleight, Sean C
Bartley, Bryan A
Lieviant, Jane A
Sauro, Herbert M
author_facet Sleight, Sean C
Bartley, Bryan A
Lieviant, Jane A
Sauro, Herbert M
author_sort Sleight, Sean C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One problem with engineered genetic circuits in synthetic microbes is their stability over evolutionary time in the absence of selective pressure. Since design of a selective environment for maintaining function of a circuit will be unique to every circuit, general design principles are needed for engineering evolutionary robust circuits that permit the long-term study or applied use of synthetic circuits. RESULTS: We first measured the stability of two BioBrick-assembled genetic circuits propagated in Escherichia coli over multiple generations and the mutations that caused their loss-of-function. The first circuit, T9002, loses function in less than 20 generations and the mutation that repeatedly causes its loss-of-function is a deletion between two homologous transcriptional terminators. To measure the effect between transcriptional terminator homology levels and evolutionary stability, we re-engineered six versions of T9002 with a different transcriptional terminator at the end of the circuit. When there is no homology between terminators, the evolutionary half-life of this circuit is significantly improved over 2-fold and is independent of the expression level. Removing homology between terminators and decreasing expression level 4-fold increases the evolutionary half-life over 17-fold. The second circuit, I7101, loses function in less than 50 generations due to a deletion between repeated operator sequences in the promoter. This circuit was re-engineered with different promoters from a promoter library and using a kanamycin resistance gene (kanR) within the circuit to put a selective pressure on the promoter. The evolutionary stability dynamics and loss-of-function mutations in all these circuits are described. We also found that on average, evolutionary half-life exponentially decreases with increasing expression levels. CONCLUSIONS: A wide variety of loss-of-function mutations are observed in BioBrick-assembled genetic circuits including point mutations, small insertions and deletions, large deletions, and insertion sequence (IS) element insertions that often occur in the scar sequence between parts. Promoter mutations are selected for more than any other biological part. Genetic circuits can be re-engineered to be more evolutionary robust with a few simple design principles: high expression of genetic circuits comes with the cost of low evolutionary stability, avoid repeated sequences, and the use of inducible promoters increases stability. Inclusion of an antibiotic resistance gene within the circuit does not ensure evolutionary stability.
format Text
id pubmed-2991278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29912782010-11-25 Designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits Sleight, Sean C Bartley, Bryan A Lieviant, Jane A Sauro, Herbert M J Biol Eng Research BACKGROUND: One problem with engineered genetic circuits in synthetic microbes is their stability over evolutionary time in the absence of selective pressure. Since design of a selective environment for maintaining function of a circuit will be unique to every circuit, general design principles are needed for engineering evolutionary robust circuits that permit the long-term study or applied use of synthetic circuits. RESULTS: We first measured the stability of two BioBrick-assembled genetic circuits propagated in Escherichia coli over multiple generations and the mutations that caused their loss-of-function. The first circuit, T9002, loses function in less than 20 generations and the mutation that repeatedly causes its loss-of-function is a deletion between two homologous transcriptional terminators. To measure the effect between transcriptional terminator homology levels and evolutionary stability, we re-engineered six versions of T9002 with a different transcriptional terminator at the end of the circuit. When there is no homology between terminators, the evolutionary half-life of this circuit is significantly improved over 2-fold and is independent of the expression level. Removing homology between terminators and decreasing expression level 4-fold increases the evolutionary half-life over 17-fold. The second circuit, I7101, loses function in less than 50 generations due to a deletion between repeated operator sequences in the promoter. This circuit was re-engineered with different promoters from a promoter library and using a kanamycin resistance gene (kanR) within the circuit to put a selective pressure on the promoter. The evolutionary stability dynamics and loss-of-function mutations in all these circuits are described. We also found that on average, evolutionary half-life exponentially decreases with increasing expression levels. CONCLUSIONS: A wide variety of loss-of-function mutations are observed in BioBrick-assembled genetic circuits including point mutations, small insertions and deletions, large deletions, and insertion sequence (IS) element insertions that often occur in the scar sequence between parts. Promoter mutations are selected for more than any other biological part. Genetic circuits can be re-engineered to be more evolutionary robust with a few simple design principles: high expression of genetic circuits comes with the cost of low evolutionary stability, avoid repeated sequences, and the use of inducible promoters increases stability. Inclusion of an antibiotic resistance gene within the circuit does not ensure evolutionary stability. BioMed Central 2010-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2991278/ /pubmed/21040586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-4-12 Text en Copyright ©2010 Sleight et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sleight, Sean C
Bartley, Bryan A
Lieviant, Jane A
Sauro, Herbert M
Designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits
title Designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits
title_full Designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits
title_fullStr Designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits
title_full_unstemmed Designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits
title_short Designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits
title_sort designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-4-12
work_keys_str_mv AT sleightseanc designingandengineeringevolutionaryrobustgeneticcircuits
AT bartleybryana designingandengineeringevolutionaryrobustgeneticcircuits
AT lieviantjanea designingandengineeringevolutionaryrobustgeneticcircuits
AT sauroherbertm designingandengineeringevolutionaryrobustgeneticcircuits