Cargando…
Comparison of low molecular weight glutenin subunits identified by SDS-PAGE, 2-DE, MALDI-TOF-MS and PCR in common wheat
BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (LMW-GS) play a crucial role in determining end-use quality of common wheat by influencing the viscoelastic properties of dough. Four different methods - sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), two-dimensional gel elect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3017774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20573275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-124 |
_version_ | 1782195947254579200 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Li Ikeda, Tatsuya M Branlard, Gerard Peña, Roberto J Rogers, William J Lerner, Silvia E Kolman, María A Xia, Xianchun Wang, Linhai Ma, Wujun Appels, Rudi Yoshida, Hisashi Wang, Aili Yan, Yueming He, Zhonghu |
author_facet | Liu, Li Ikeda, Tatsuya M Branlard, Gerard Peña, Roberto J Rogers, William J Lerner, Silvia E Kolman, María A Xia, Xianchun Wang, Linhai Ma, Wujun Appels, Rudi Yoshida, Hisashi Wang, Aili Yan, Yueming He, Zhonghu |
author_sort | Liu, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (LMW-GS) play a crucial role in determining end-use quality of common wheat by influencing the viscoelastic properties of dough. Four different methods - sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE, IEF × SDS-PAGE), matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), were used to characterize the LMW-GS composition in 103 cultivars from 12 countries. RESULTS: At the Glu-A3 locus, all seven alleles could be reliably identified by 2-DE and PCR. However, the alleles Glu-A3e and Glu-A3d could not be routinely distinguished from Glu-A3f and Glu-A3g, respectively, based on SDS-PAGE, and the allele Glu-A3a could not be differentiated from Glu-A3c by MALDI-TOF-MS. At the Glu-B3 locus, alleles Glu-B3a, Glu-B3b, Glu-B3c, Glu-B3g, Glu-B3h and Glu-B3j could be clearly identified by all four methods, whereas Glu-B3ab, Glu-B3ac, Glu-B3ad could only be identified by the 2-DE method. At the Glu-D3 locus, allelic identification was problematic for the electrophoresis based methods and PCR. MALDI-TOF-MS has the potential to reliably identify the Glu-D3 alleles. CONCLUSIONS: PCR is the simplest, most accurate, lowest cost, and therefore recommended method for identification of Glu-A3 and Glu-B3 alleles in breeding programs. A combination of methods was required to identify certain alleles, and would be especially useful when characterizing new alleles. A standard set of 30 cultivars for use in future studies was chosen to represent all LMW-GS allelic variants in the collection. Among them, Chinese Spring, Opata 85, Seri 82 and Pavon 76 were recommended as a core set for use in SDS-PAGE gels. Glu-D3c and Glu-D3e are the same allele. Two new alleles, namely, Glu-D3m in cultivar Darius, and Glu-D3n in Fengmai 27, were identified by 2-DE. Utilization of the suggested standard cultivar set, seed of which is available from the CIMMYT and INRA Clermont-Ferrand germplasm collections, should also promote information sharing in the identification of individual LMW-GS and thus provide useful information for quality improvement in common wheat. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3017774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30177742011-01-10 Comparison of low molecular weight glutenin subunits identified by SDS-PAGE, 2-DE, MALDI-TOF-MS and PCR in common wheat Liu, Li Ikeda, Tatsuya M Branlard, Gerard Peña, Roberto J Rogers, William J Lerner, Silvia E Kolman, María A Xia, Xianchun Wang, Linhai Ma, Wujun Appels, Rudi Yoshida, Hisashi Wang, Aili Yan, Yueming He, Zhonghu BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (LMW-GS) play a crucial role in determining end-use quality of common wheat by influencing the viscoelastic properties of dough. Four different methods - sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE, IEF × SDS-PAGE), matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), were used to characterize the LMW-GS composition in 103 cultivars from 12 countries. RESULTS: At the Glu-A3 locus, all seven alleles could be reliably identified by 2-DE and PCR. However, the alleles Glu-A3e and Glu-A3d could not be routinely distinguished from Glu-A3f and Glu-A3g, respectively, based on SDS-PAGE, and the allele Glu-A3a could not be differentiated from Glu-A3c by MALDI-TOF-MS. At the Glu-B3 locus, alleles Glu-B3a, Glu-B3b, Glu-B3c, Glu-B3g, Glu-B3h and Glu-B3j could be clearly identified by all four methods, whereas Glu-B3ab, Glu-B3ac, Glu-B3ad could only be identified by the 2-DE method. At the Glu-D3 locus, allelic identification was problematic for the electrophoresis based methods and PCR. MALDI-TOF-MS has the potential to reliably identify the Glu-D3 alleles. CONCLUSIONS: PCR is the simplest, most accurate, lowest cost, and therefore recommended method for identification of Glu-A3 and Glu-B3 alleles in breeding programs. A combination of methods was required to identify certain alleles, and would be especially useful when characterizing new alleles. A standard set of 30 cultivars for use in future studies was chosen to represent all LMW-GS allelic variants in the collection. Among them, Chinese Spring, Opata 85, Seri 82 and Pavon 76 were recommended as a core set for use in SDS-PAGE gels. Glu-D3c and Glu-D3e are the same allele. Two new alleles, namely, Glu-D3m in cultivar Darius, and Glu-D3n in Fengmai 27, were identified by 2-DE. Utilization of the suggested standard cultivar set, seed of which is available from the CIMMYT and INRA Clermont-Ferrand germplasm collections, should also promote information sharing in the identification of individual LMW-GS and thus provide useful information for quality improvement in common wheat. BioMed Central 2010-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3017774/ /pubmed/20573275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-124 Text en Copyright ©2010 Liu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Li Ikeda, Tatsuya M Branlard, Gerard Peña, Roberto J Rogers, William J Lerner, Silvia E Kolman, María A Xia, Xianchun Wang, Linhai Ma, Wujun Appels, Rudi Yoshida, Hisashi Wang, Aili Yan, Yueming He, Zhonghu Comparison of low molecular weight glutenin subunits identified by SDS-PAGE, 2-DE, MALDI-TOF-MS and PCR in common wheat |
title | Comparison of low molecular weight glutenin subunits identified by SDS-PAGE, 2-DE, MALDI-TOF-MS and PCR in common wheat |
title_full | Comparison of low molecular weight glutenin subunits identified by SDS-PAGE, 2-DE, MALDI-TOF-MS and PCR in common wheat |
title_fullStr | Comparison of low molecular weight glutenin subunits identified by SDS-PAGE, 2-DE, MALDI-TOF-MS and PCR in common wheat |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of low molecular weight glutenin subunits identified by SDS-PAGE, 2-DE, MALDI-TOF-MS and PCR in common wheat |
title_short | Comparison of low molecular weight glutenin subunits identified by SDS-PAGE, 2-DE, MALDI-TOF-MS and PCR in common wheat |
title_sort | comparison of low molecular weight glutenin subunits identified by sds-page, 2-de, maldi-tof-ms and pcr in common wheat |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3017774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20573275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuli comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT ikedatatsuyam comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT branlardgerard comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT penarobertoj comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT rogerswilliamj comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT lernersilviae comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT kolmanmariaa comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT xiaxianchun comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT wanglinhai comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT mawujun comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT appelsrudi comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT yoshidahisashi comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT wangaili comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT yanyueming comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat AT hezhonghu comparisonoflowmolecularweightgluteninsubunitsidentifiedbysdspage2demalditofmsandpcrincommonwheat |