Cargando…

Phylogenomic reconstruction of lactic acid bacteria: an update

BACKGROUND: Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are important in the food industry for the production of fermented food products and in human health as commensals in the gut. However, the phylogenetic relationships among LAB species remain under intensive debate owing to disagreements among different data se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zhi-Gang, Ye, Zhi-Qiang, Yu, Li, Shi, Peng
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21194491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-1
_version_ 1782196738950430720
author Zhang, Zhi-Gang
Ye, Zhi-Qiang
Yu, Li
Shi, Peng
author_facet Zhang, Zhi-Gang
Ye, Zhi-Qiang
Yu, Li
Shi, Peng
author_sort Zhang, Zhi-Gang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are important in the food industry for the production of fermented food products and in human health as commensals in the gut. However, the phylogenetic relationships among LAB species remain under intensive debate owing to disagreements among different data sets. RESULTS: We performed a phylogenetic analysis of LAB species based on 232 genes from 28 LAB genome sequences. Regardless of the tree-building methods used, combined analyses yielded an identical, well-resolved tree topology with strong supports for all nodes. The LAB species examined were divided into two groups. Group 1 included families Enterococcaceae and Streptococcaceae. Group 2 included families Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Within Group 2, the LAB species were divided into two clades. One clade comprised of the acidophilus complex of genus Lactobacillus and two other species, Lb. sakei and Lb. casei. In the acidophilus complex, Lb. delbrueckii separated first, while Lb. acidophilus/Lb. helveticus and Lb. gasseri/Lb. johnsonii were clustered into a sister group. The other clade within Group 2 consisted of the salivarius subgroup, including five species, Lb. salivarius, Lb. plantarum, Lb. brevis, Lb. reuteri, Lb. fermentum, and the genera Pediococcus, Oenococcus, and Leuconostoc. In this clade, Lb. salivarius was positioned most basally, followed by two clusters, one corresponding to Lb. plantarum/Lb. brevis pair and Pediococcus, and the other including Oenococcus/Leuconostoc pair and Lb. reuteri/Lb. fermentum pair. In addition, phylogenetic utility of the 232 genes was analyzed to identify those that may be more useful than others. The genes identified as useful were related to translation and ribosomal structure and biogenesis (TRSB), and a three-gene set comprising genes encoding ultra-violet resistance protein B (uvrB), DNA polymerase III (polC) and penicillin binding protein 2B (pbpB). CONCLUSIONS: Our phylogenomic analyses provide important insights into the evolution and diversification of LAB species, and also revealed the phylogenetic utility of several genes. We infer that the occurrence of multiple, independent adaptation events in LAB species, have resulted in their occupation of various habitats. Further analyses of more genes from additional, representative LAB species are needed to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying adaptation of LAB species to various environmental niches.
format Text
id pubmed-3024227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30242272011-01-21 Phylogenomic reconstruction of lactic acid bacteria: an update Zhang, Zhi-Gang Ye, Zhi-Qiang Yu, Li Shi, Peng BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are important in the food industry for the production of fermented food products and in human health as commensals in the gut. However, the phylogenetic relationships among LAB species remain under intensive debate owing to disagreements among different data sets. RESULTS: We performed a phylogenetic analysis of LAB species based on 232 genes from 28 LAB genome sequences. Regardless of the tree-building methods used, combined analyses yielded an identical, well-resolved tree topology with strong supports for all nodes. The LAB species examined were divided into two groups. Group 1 included families Enterococcaceae and Streptococcaceae. Group 2 included families Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Within Group 2, the LAB species were divided into two clades. One clade comprised of the acidophilus complex of genus Lactobacillus and two other species, Lb. sakei and Lb. casei. In the acidophilus complex, Lb. delbrueckii separated first, while Lb. acidophilus/Lb. helveticus and Lb. gasseri/Lb. johnsonii were clustered into a sister group. The other clade within Group 2 consisted of the salivarius subgroup, including five species, Lb. salivarius, Lb. plantarum, Lb. brevis, Lb. reuteri, Lb. fermentum, and the genera Pediococcus, Oenococcus, and Leuconostoc. In this clade, Lb. salivarius was positioned most basally, followed by two clusters, one corresponding to Lb. plantarum/Lb. brevis pair and Pediococcus, and the other including Oenococcus/Leuconostoc pair and Lb. reuteri/Lb. fermentum pair. In addition, phylogenetic utility of the 232 genes was analyzed to identify those that may be more useful than others. The genes identified as useful were related to translation and ribosomal structure and biogenesis (TRSB), and a three-gene set comprising genes encoding ultra-violet resistance protein B (uvrB), DNA polymerase III (polC) and penicillin binding protein 2B (pbpB). CONCLUSIONS: Our phylogenomic analyses provide important insights into the evolution and diversification of LAB species, and also revealed the phylogenetic utility of several genes. We infer that the occurrence of multiple, independent adaptation events in LAB species, have resulted in their occupation of various habitats. Further analyses of more genes from additional, representative LAB species are needed to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying adaptation of LAB species to various environmental niches. BioMed Central 2011-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3024227/ /pubmed/21194491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-1 Text en Copyright ©2011 Zhang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Zhi-Gang
Ye, Zhi-Qiang
Yu, Li
Shi, Peng
Phylogenomic reconstruction of lactic acid bacteria: an update
title Phylogenomic reconstruction of lactic acid bacteria: an update
title_full Phylogenomic reconstruction of lactic acid bacteria: an update
title_fullStr Phylogenomic reconstruction of lactic acid bacteria: an update
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenomic reconstruction of lactic acid bacteria: an update
title_short Phylogenomic reconstruction of lactic acid bacteria: an update
title_sort phylogenomic reconstruction of lactic acid bacteria: an update
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21194491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzhigang phylogenomicreconstructionoflacticacidbacteriaanupdate
AT yezhiqiang phylogenomicreconstructionoflacticacidbacteriaanupdate
AT yuli phylogenomicreconstructionoflacticacidbacteriaanupdate
AT shipeng phylogenomicreconstructionoflacticacidbacteriaanupdate