Cargando…

Evolution of ligand specificity in vertebrate corticosteroid receptors

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid receptors include mineralocorticoid (MR) and glucocorticoid (GR) receptors. Teleost fishes have a single MR and duplicate GRs that show variable sensitivities to mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids. How these receptors compare functionally to tetrapod MR and GR, and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arterbery, Adam S, Fergus, Daniel J, Fogarty, Elizabeth A, Mayberry, John, Deitcher, David L, Lee Kraus, W, Bass, Andrew H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3025851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21232159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-14
_version_ 1782196946700599296
author Arterbery, Adam S
Fergus, Daniel J
Fogarty, Elizabeth A
Mayberry, John
Deitcher, David L
Lee Kraus, W
Bass, Andrew H
author_facet Arterbery, Adam S
Fergus, Daniel J
Fogarty, Elizabeth A
Mayberry, John
Deitcher, David L
Lee Kraus, W
Bass, Andrew H
author_sort Arterbery, Adam S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid receptors include mineralocorticoid (MR) and glucocorticoid (GR) receptors. Teleost fishes have a single MR and duplicate GRs that show variable sensitivities to mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids. How these receptors compare functionally to tetrapod MR and GR, and the evolutionary significance of maintaining two GRs, remains unclear. RESULTS: We used up to seven steroids (including aldosterone, cortisol and 11-deoxycorticosterone [DOC]) to compare the ligand specificity of the ligand binding domains of corticosteroid receptors between a mammal (Mus musculus) and the midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus), a teleost model for steroid regulation of neural and behavioral plasticity. Variation in mineralocorticoid sensitivity was considered in a broader phylogenetic context by examining the aldosterone sensitivity of MR and GRs from the distantly related daffodil cichlid (Neolamprologus pulcher), another teleost model for neurobehavioral plasticity. Both teleost species had a single MR and duplicate GRs. All MRs were sensitive to DOC, consistent with the hypothesis that DOC was the initial ligand of the ancestral MR. Variation in GR steroid-specificity corresponds to nine identified amino acid residue substitutions rather than phylogenetic relationships based on receptor sequences. CONCLUSION: The mineralocorticoid sensitivity of duplicate GRs in teleosts is highly labile in the context of their evolutionary phylogeny, a property that likely led to neo-functionalization and maintenance of two GRs.
format Text
id pubmed-3025851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30258512011-01-25 Evolution of ligand specificity in vertebrate corticosteroid receptors Arterbery, Adam S Fergus, Daniel J Fogarty, Elizabeth A Mayberry, John Deitcher, David L Lee Kraus, W Bass, Andrew H BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid receptors include mineralocorticoid (MR) and glucocorticoid (GR) receptors. Teleost fishes have a single MR and duplicate GRs that show variable sensitivities to mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids. How these receptors compare functionally to tetrapod MR and GR, and the evolutionary significance of maintaining two GRs, remains unclear. RESULTS: We used up to seven steroids (including aldosterone, cortisol and 11-deoxycorticosterone [DOC]) to compare the ligand specificity of the ligand binding domains of corticosteroid receptors between a mammal (Mus musculus) and the midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus), a teleost model for steroid regulation of neural and behavioral plasticity. Variation in mineralocorticoid sensitivity was considered in a broader phylogenetic context by examining the aldosterone sensitivity of MR and GRs from the distantly related daffodil cichlid (Neolamprologus pulcher), another teleost model for neurobehavioral plasticity. Both teleost species had a single MR and duplicate GRs. All MRs were sensitive to DOC, consistent with the hypothesis that DOC was the initial ligand of the ancestral MR. Variation in GR steroid-specificity corresponds to nine identified amino acid residue substitutions rather than phylogenetic relationships based on receptor sequences. CONCLUSION: The mineralocorticoid sensitivity of duplicate GRs in teleosts is highly labile in the context of their evolutionary phylogeny, a property that likely led to neo-functionalization and maintenance of two GRs. BioMed Central 2011-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3025851/ /pubmed/21232159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-14 Text en Copyright ©2011 Arterbery et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Arterbery, Adam S
Fergus, Daniel J
Fogarty, Elizabeth A
Mayberry, John
Deitcher, David L
Lee Kraus, W
Bass, Andrew H
Evolution of ligand specificity in vertebrate corticosteroid receptors
title Evolution of ligand specificity in vertebrate corticosteroid receptors
title_full Evolution of ligand specificity in vertebrate corticosteroid receptors
title_fullStr Evolution of ligand specificity in vertebrate corticosteroid receptors
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of ligand specificity in vertebrate corticosteroid receptors
title_short Evolution of ligand specificity in vertebrate corticosteroid receptors
title_sort evolution of ligand specificity in vertebrate corticosteroid receptors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3025851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21232159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-14
work_keys_str_mv AT arterberyadams evolutionofligandspecificityinvertebratecorticosteroidreceptors
AT fergusdanielj evolutionofligandspecificityinvertebratecorticosteroidreceptors
AT fogartyelizabetha evolutionofligandspecificityinvertebratecorticosteroidreceptors
AT mayberryjohn evolutionofligandspecificityinvertebratecorticosteroidreceptors
AT deitcherdavidl evolutionofligandspecificityinvertebratecorticosteroidreceptors
AT leekrausw evolutionofligandspecificityinvertebratecorticosteroidreceptors
AT bassandrewh evolutionofligandspecificityinvertebratecorticosteroidreceptors