Cargando…

Cleavage of model substrates by archaeal RNase P: role of protein cofactors in cleavage-site selection

RNase P is a catalytic ribonucleoprotein primarily involved in tRNA biogenesis. Archaeal RNase P comprises a catalytic RNase P RNA (RPR) and at least four protein cofactors (RPPs), which function as two binary complexes (POP5•RPP30 and RPP21• RPP29). Exploiting the ability to assemble a functional P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinapah, Sylvie, Wu, Shiying, Chen, Yu, Pettersson, B. M. Fredrik, Gopalan, Venkat, Kirsebom, Leif A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
RNA
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20935047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq732
_version_ 1782197767494434816
author Sinapah, Sylvie
Wu, Shiying
Chen, Yu
Pettersson, B. M. Fredrik
Gopalan, Venkat
Kirsebom, Leif A.
author_facet Sinapah, Sylvie
Wu, Shiying
Chen, Yu
Pettersson, B. M. Fredrik
Gopalan, Venkat
Kirsebom, Leif A.
author_sort Sinapah, Sylvie
collection PubMed
description RNase P is a catalytic ribonucleoprotein primarily involved in tRNA biogenesis. Archaeal RNase P comprises a catalytic RNase P RNA (RPR) and at least four protein cofactors (RPPs), which function as two binary complexes (POP5•RPP30 and RPP21• RPP29). Exploiting the ability to assemble a functional Pyrococcus furiosus (Pfu) RNase P in vitro, we examined the role of RPPs in influencing substrate recognition by the RPR. We first demonstrate that Pfu RPR, like its bacterial and eukaryal counterparts, cleaves model hairpin loop substrates albeit at rates 90- to 200-fold lower when compared with cleavage by bacterial RPR, highlighting the functionally comparable catalytic cores in bacterial and archaeal RPRs. By investigating cleavage-site selection exhibited by Pfu RPR (±RPPs) with various model substrates missing consensus-recognition elements, we determined substrate features whose recognition is facilitated by either POP5•RPP30 or RPP21•RPP29 (directly or indirectly via the RPR). Our results also revealed that Pfu RPR + RPP21•RPP29 displays substrate-recognition properties coinciding with those of the bacterial RPR-alone reaction rather than the Pfu RPR, and that this behaviour is attributable to structural differences in the substrate-specificity domains of bacterial and archaeal RPRs. Moreover, our data reveal a hierarchy in recognition elements that dictates cleavage-site selection by archaeal RNase P.
format Text
id pubmed-3035440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30354402011-02-08 Cleavage of model substrates by archaeal RNase P: role of protein cofactors in cleavage-site selection Sinapah, Sylvie Wu, Shiying Chen, Yu Pettersson, B. M. Fredrik Gopalan, Venkat Kirsebom, Leif A. Nucleic Acids Res RNA RNase P is a catalytic ribonucleoprotein primarily involved in tRNA biogenesis. Archaeal RNase P comprises a catalytic RNase P RNA (RPR) and at least four protein cofactors (RPPs), which function as two binary complexes (POP5•RPP30 and RPP21• RPP29). Exploiting the ability to assemble a functional Pyrococcus furiosus (Pfu) RNase P in vitro, we examined the role of RPPs in influencing substrate recognition by the RPR. We first demonstrate that Pfu RPR, like its bacterial and eukaryal counterparts, cleaves model hairpin loop substrates albeit at rates 90- to 200-fold lower when compared with cleavage by bacterial RPR, highlighting the functionally comparable catalytic cores in bacterial and archaeal RPRs. By investigating cleavage-site selection exhibited by Pfu RPR (±RPPs) with various model substrates missing consensus-recognition elements, we determined substrate features whose recognition is facilitated by either POP5•RPP30 or RPP21•RPP29 (directly or indirectly via the RPR). Our results also revealed that Pfu RPR + RPP21•RPP29 displays substrate-recognition properties coinciding with those of the bacterial RPR-alone reaction rather than the Pfu RPR, and that this behaviour is attributable to structural differences in the substrate-specificity domains of bacterial and archaeal RPRs. Moreover, our data reveal a hierarchy in recognition elements that dictates cleavage-site selection by archaeal RNase P. Oxford University Press 2011-02 2010-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3035440/ /pubmed/20935047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq732 Text en © The Author(s) 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RNA
Sinapah, Sylvie
Wu, Shiying
Chen, Yu
Pettersson, B. M. Fredrik
Gopalan, Venkat
Kirsebom, Leif A.
Cleavage of model substrates by archaeal RNase P: role of protein cofactors in cleavage-site selection
title Cleavage of model substrates by archaeal RNase P: role of protein cofactors in cleavage-site selection
title_full Cleavage of model substrates by archaeal RNase P: role of protein cofactors in cleavage-site selection
title_fullStr Cleavage of model substrates by archaeal RNase P: role of protein cofactors in cleavage-site selection
title_full_unstemmed Cleavage of model substrates by archaeal RNase P: role of protein cofactors in cleavage-site selection
title_short Cleavage of model substrates by archaeal RNase P: role of protein cofactors in cleavage-site selection
title_sort cleavage of model substrates by archaeal rnase p: role of protein cofactors in cleavage-site selection
topic RNA
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20935047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq732
work_keys_str_mv AT sinapahsylvie cleavageofmodelsubstratesbyarchaealrnaseproleofproteincofactorsincleavagesiteselection
AT wushiying cleavageofmodelsubstratesbyarchaealrnaseproleofproteincofactorsincleavagesiteselection
AT chenyu cleavageofmodelsubstratesbyarchaealrnaseproleofproteincofactorsincleavagesiteselection
AT petterssonbmfredrik cleavageofmodelsubstratesbyarchaealrnaseproleofproteincofactorsincleavagesiteselection
AT gopalanvenkat cleavageofmodelsubstratesbyarchaealrnaseproleofproteincofactorsincleavagesiteselection
AT kirsebomleifa cleavageofmodelsubstratesbyarchaealrnaseproleofproteincofactorsincleavagesiteselection