Cargando…
Validation of Self-Reported Health Literacy Questions Among Diverse English and Spanish-Speaking Populations
BACKGROUND: Limited health literacy (HL) contributes to poor health outcomes and disparities, and direct measurement is often time-intensive. Self-reported HL questions have not been validated among Spanish-speaking and diverse English-speaking populations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate three self-reported...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21057882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1552-1 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Limited health literacy (HL) contributes to poor health outcomes and disparities, and direct measurement is often time-intensive. Self-reported HL questions have not been validated among Spanish-speaking and diverse English-speaking populations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate three self-reported questions:1 “How confident are you filling out medical forms?”;2 “How often do you have problems learning about your medical condition because of difficulty understanding written information?”; and3 “How often do you have someone help you read hospital materials?” Answers were based on a 5-point Likert scale. DESIGN: This was a validation study nested within a trial of diabetes self-management support in the San Francisco Department of Public Health. PARTICIPANTS: English and Spanish-speaking adults with type 2 diabetes receiving primary care. METHODS: Using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (s-TOFHLA) in English and Spanish as the reference, we classified HL as inadequate, marginal, or adequate. We calculated the C-index and test characteristics of the three questions and summative scale compared to the s-TOFHLA and assessed variations in performance by language, race/ethnicity, age, and education. KEY RESULTS: Of 296 participants, 48% were Spanish-speaking; 9% were White, non-Hispanic; 47% had inadequate HL and 12% had marginal HL. Overall, 57% reported being confident with forms “somewhat” or less. The “confident with forms” question performed best for detecting inadequate (C-index = 0.82, (0.77-0.87)) and inadequate plus marginal HL (C index = 0.81, (0.76-0.86); p < 0.01 for differences from other questions), and performed comparably to the summative scale. The “confident with forms” question and scale also performed best across language, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and age. CONCLUSIONS: A single self-reported HL question about confidence with forms and a summative scale of three questions discriminated between Spanish and English speakers with adequate HL and those with inadequate and/or inadequate plus marginal HL. The “confident with forms” question or the summative scale may be useful for estimating HL in clinical research involving Spanish-speaking and English-speaking, chronically-ill, diverse populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1552-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
---|