Cargando…

Dose-Levels and First Signs of Efficacy in Contemporary Oncology Phase 1 Clinical Trials

PURPOSE: Phase 1 trials play a crucial role in oncology by translating laboratory science into efficient therapies. Molecular targeted agents (MTA) differ from traditional cytotoxics in terms of both efficacy and toxicity profiles. Recent reports suggest that higher doses are not essential to produc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferte, Charles, Soria, Jean-Charles, Penel, Nicolas
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21415927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016633
_version_ 1782200215620550656
author Ferte, Charles
Soria, Jean-Charles
Penel, Nicolas
author_facet Ferte, Charles
Soria, Jean-Charles
Penel, Nicolas
author_sort Ferte, Charles
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Phase 1 trials play a crucial role in oncology by translating laboratory science into efficient therapies. Molecular targeted agents (MTA) differ from traditional cytotoxics in terms of both efficacy and toxicity profiles. Recent reports suggest that higher doses are not essential to produce the optimal anti-tumor effect. This study aimed to assess if MTA could achieve clinical benefit at much lower dose than traditional cytotoxics in dose seeking phase 1 trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 317 recent phase 1 oncology trials reported in the literature between January 1997 and January 2009. First sign of efficacy, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and their associated dose level were recorded in each trial. RESULTS: Trials investigating conventional cytotoxics alone, MTA alone and combination of both represented respectively 63.0% (201/317), 23.3% (74/317) and 13.7% (42/317) of all trials. The MTD was reached in 65.9% (209/317) of all trials and was mostly observed at the fifth dose level. First sign of efficacy was less frequently observed at the first three dose-levels for MTA as compared to conventional cytotoxics or combinations regimens (48.3% versus 63.2% and 61.3%). Sign of efficacy was observed in the same proportion whatever the treatment type (73–82%). MTD was less frequently established in trials investigating MTA alone (51.3%) or combinations (42.8%) as compared to conventional cytotoxic agents (75.6%). CONCLUSION: First sign of efficacy was less frequently reported at the early dose-levels and MTD was less frequently reached in trials investigating molecular targeted therapy alone. Similar proportion of trials reported clinical benefit.
format Text
id pubmed-3056556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30565562011-03-17 Dose-Levels and First Signs of Efficacy in Contemporary Oncology Phase 1 Clinical Trials Ferte, Charles Soria, Jean-Charles Penel, Nicolas PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Phase 1 trials play a crucial role in oncology by translating laboratory science into efficient therapies. Molecular targeted agents (MTA) differ from traditional cytotoxics in terms of both efficacy and toxicity profiles. Recent reports suggest that higher doses are not essential to produce the optimal anti-tumor effect. This study aimed to assess if MTA could achieve clinical benefit at much lower dose than traditional cytotoxics in dose seeking phase 1 trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 317 recent phase 1 oncology trials reported in the literature between January 1997 and January 2009. First sign of efficacy, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and their associated dose level were recorded in each trial. RESULTS: Trials investigating conventional cytotoxics alone, MTA alone and combination of both represented respectively 63.0% (201/317), 23.3% (74/317) and 13.7% (42/317) of all trials. The MTD was reached in 65.9% (209/317) of all trials and was mostly observed at the fifth dose level. First sign of efficacy was less frequently observed at the first three dose-levels for MTA as compared to conventional cytotoxics or combinations regimens (48.3% versus 63.2% and 61.3%). Sign of efficacy was observed in the same proportion whatever the treatment type (73–82%). MTD was less frequently established in trials investigating MTA alone (51.3%) or combinations (42.8%) as compared to conventional cytotoxic agents (75.6%). CONCLUSION: First sign of efficacy was less frequently reported at the early dose-levels and MTD was less frequently reached in trials investigating molecular targeted therapy alone. Similar proportion of trials reported clinical benefit. Public Library of Science 2011-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3056556/ /pubmed/21415927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016633 Text en Ferte et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferte, Charles
Soria, Jean-Charles
Penel, Nicolas
Dose-Levels and First Signs of Efficacy in Contemporary Oncology Phase 1 Clinical Trials
title Dose-Levels and First Signs of Efficacy in Contemporary Oncology Phase 1 Clinical Trials
title_full Dose-Levels and First Signs of Efficacy in Contemporary Oncology Phase 1 Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Dose-Levels and First Signs of Efficacy in Contemporary Oncology Phase 1 Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Dose-Levels and First Signs of Efficacy in Contemporary Oncology Phase 1 Clinical Trials
title_short Dose-Levels and First Signs of Efficacy in Contemporary Oncology Phase 1 Clinical Trials
title_sort dose-levels and first signs of efficacy in contemporary oncology phase 1 clinical trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21415927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016633
work_keys_str_mv AT fertecharles doselevelsandfirstsignsofefficacyincontemporaryoncologyphase1clinicaltrials
AT soriajeancharles doselevelsandfirstsignsofefficacyincontemporaryoncologyphase1clinicaltrials
AT penelnicolas doselevelsandfirstsignsofefficacyincontemporaryoncologyphase1clinicaltrials