Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using non resorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-l-lactide-co-d,l-lactide fusion devices. Clinical outcome at a minimum of 2-year follow-up

Previous papers on resorbable poly-l-lactide-co-d,l-lactide (PLDLLA) cages in spinal fusion have failed to report adequately on patient-centred clinical outcome measures. Also comparison of PLDLLA cage with a traditionally applicable counterpart has not been previously reported. This is the first ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiya, Timothy U., Smit, T., van Royen, B. J., Mullender, M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3065608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20842388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1568-6

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3065608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20842388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1568-6

Ejemplares similares