Cargando…

Contractility Dominates Adhesive Ligand Density in Regulating Cellular De-adhesion and Retraction Kinetics

Cells that are enzymatically detached from a solid substrate rapidly round up as the tensile prestress in the cytoskeleton is suddenly unopposed by cell–ECM adhesions. We recently showed that this retraction follows sigmoidal kinetics with time constants that correlate closely with cortical stiffnes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sen, Shamik, Ng, Win Pin, Kumar, Sanjay
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21046466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0195-z
_version_ 1782201337273909248
author Sen, Shamik
Ng, Win Pin
Kumar, Sanjay
author_facet Sen, Shamik
Ng, Win Pin
Kumar, Sanjay
author_sort Sen, Shamik
collection PubMed
description Cells that are enzymatically detached from a solid substrate rapidly round up as the tensile prestress in the cytoskeleton is suddenly unopposed by cell–ECM adhesions. We recently showed that this retraction follows sigmoidal kinetics with time constants that correlate closely with cortical stiffness values. This raises the promising prospect that these de-adhesion measurements may be used for high-throughput screening of cell mechanical properties; however, an important limitation to doing so is the possibility that the retraction kinetics may also be influenced and potentially rate-limited by the time needed to sever matrix adhesions. In this study, we address this open question by separating contributions of contractility and adhesion to cellular de-adhesion and retraction kinetics. We first develop serum-free conditions under which U373 MG glioma cells can be cultured on substrates of fixed fibronectin density without direct matrix contributions from the medium. We show that while spreading area increases with ECM protein density, cortical stiffness and the time constants of retraction do not. Conversely, addition of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) to stimulate cell contractility strongly speeds retraction, independent of the initial matrix protein density and LPA’s contributions to spreading area. All of these trends hold in serum-rich medium commonly used in tissue culture, with the time constants of retraction much more closely tracking cortical stiffness than adhesive ligand density or cell spreading. These results support the use of cellular de-adhesion measurements to track cellular mechanical properties.
format Text
id pubmed-3069333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30693332011-05-02 Contractility Dominates Adhesive Ligand Density in Regulating Cellular De-adhesion and Retraction Kinetics Sen, Shamik Ng, Win Pin Kumar, Sanjay Ann Biomed Eng Article Cells that are enzymatically detached from a solid substrate rapidly round up as the tensile prestress in the cytoskeleton is suddenly unopposed by cell–ECM adhesions. We recently showed that this retraction follows sigmoidal kinetics with time constants that correlate closely with cortical stiffness values. This raises the promising prospect that these de-adhesion measurements may be used for high-throughput screening of cell mechanical properties; however, an important limitation to doing so is the possibility that the retraction kinetics may also be influenced and potentially rate-limited by the time needed to sever matrix adhesions. In this study, we address this open question by separating contributions of contractility and adhesion to cellular de-adhesion and retraction kinetics. We first develop serum-free conditions under which U373 MG glioma cells can be cultured on substrates of fixed fibronectin density without direct matrix contributions from the medium. We show that while spreading area increases with ECM protein density, cortical stiffness and the time constants of retraction do not. Conversely, addition of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) to stimulate cell contractility strongly speeds retraction, independent of the initial matrix protein density and LPA’s contributions to spreading area. All of these trends hold in serum-rich medium commonly used in tissue culture, with the time constants of retraction much more closely tracking cortical stiffness than adhesive ligand density or cell spreading. These results support the use of cellular de-adhesion measurements to track cellular mechanical properties. Springer US 2010-10-29 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3069333/ /pubmed/21046466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0195-z Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Sen, Shamik
Ng, Win Pin
Kumar, Sanjay
Contractility Dominates Adhesive Ligand Density in Regulating Cellular De-adhesion and Retraction Kinetics
title Contractility Dominates Adhesive Ligand Density in Regulating Cellular De-adhesion and Retraction Kinetics
title_full Contractility Dominates Adhesive Ligand Density in Regulating Cellular De-adhesion and Retraction Kinetics
title_fullStr Contractility Dominates Adhesive Ligand Density in Regulating Cellular De-adhesion and Retraction Kinetics
title_full_unstemmed Contractility Dominates Adhesive Ligand Density in Regulating Cellular De-adhesion and Retraction Kinetics
title_short Contractility Dominates Adhesive Ligand Density in Regulating Cellular De-adhesion and Retraction Kinetics
title_sort contractility dominates adhesive ligand density in regulating cellular de-adhesion and retraction kinetics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21046466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0195-z
work_keys_str_mv AT senshamik contractilitydominatesadhesiveliganddensityinregulatingcellulardeadhesionandretractionkinetics
AT ngwinpin contractilitydominatesadhesiveliganddensityinregulatingcellulardeadhesionandretractionkinetics
AT kumarsanjay contractilitydominatesadhesiveliganddensityinregulatingcellulardeadhesionandretractionkinetics