Cargando…
Using simple artificial intelligence methods for predicting amyloidogenesis in antibodies
BACKGROUND: All polypeptide backbones have the potential to form amyloid fibrils, which are associated with a number of degenerative disorders. However, the likelihood that amyloidosis would actually occur under physiological conditions depends largely on the amino acid composition of a protein. We...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3098112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20144194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-79 |
_version_ | 1782203920377970688 |
---|---|
author | David, Maria Pamela C Concepcion, Gisela P Padlan, Eduardo A |
author_facet | David, Maria Pamela C Concepcion, Gisela P Padlan, Eduardo A |
author_sort | David, Maria Pamela C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: All polypeptide backbones have the potential to form amyloid fibrils, which are associated with a number of degenerative disorders. However, the likelihood that amyloidosis would actually occur under physiological conditions depends largely on the amino acid composition of a protein. We explore using a naive Bayesian classifier and a weighted decision tree for predicting the amyloidogenicity of immunoglobulin sequences. RESULTS: The average accuracy based on leave-one-out (LOO) cross validation of a Bayesian classifier generated from 143 amyloidogenic sequences is 60.84%. This is consistent with the average accuracy of 61.15% for a holdout test set comprised of 103 AM and 28 non-amyloidogenic sequences. The LOO cross validation accuracy increases to 81.08% when the training set is augmented by the holdout test set. In comparison, the average classification accuracy for the holdout test set obtained using a decision tree is 78.64%. Non-amyloidogenic sequences are predicted with average LOO cross validation accuracies between 74.05% and 77.24% using the Bayesian classifier, depending on the training set size. The accuracy for the holdout test set was 89%. For the decision tree, the non-amyloidogenic prediction accuracy is 75.00%. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study indicates that both classification methods may be promising in providing straightforward predictions on the amyloidogenicity of a sequence. Nevertheless, the number of available sequences that satisfy the premises of this study are limited, and are consequently smaller than the ideal training set size. Increasing the size of the training set clearly increases the accuracy, and the expansion of the training set to include not only more derivatives, but more alignments, would make the method more sound. The accuracy of the classifiers may also be improved when additional factors, such as structural and physico-chemical data, are considered. The development of this type of classifier has significant applications in evaluating engineered antibodies, and may be adapted for evaluating engineered proteins in general. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3098112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30981122011-05-20 Using simple artificial intelligence methods for predicting amyloidogenesis in antibodies David, Maria Pamela C Concepcion, Gisela P Padlan, Eduardo A BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: All polypeptide backbones have the potential to form amyloid fibrils, which are associated with a number of degenerative disorders. However, the likelihood that amyloidosis would actually occur under physiological conditions depends largely on the amino acid composition of a protein. We explore using a naive Bayesian classifier and a weighted decision tree for predicting the amyloidogenicity of immunoglobulin sequences. RESULTS: The average accuracy based on leave-one-out (LOO) cross validation of a Bayesian classifier generated from 143 amyloidogenic sequences is 60.84%. This is consistent with the average accuracy of 61.15% for a holdout test set comprised of 103 AM and 28 non-amyloidogenic sequences. The LOO cross validation accuracy increases to 81.08% when the training set is augmented by the holdout test set. In comparison, the average classification accuracy for the holdout test set obtained using a decision tree is 78.64%. Non-amyloidogenic sequences are predicted with average LOO cross validation accuracies between 74.05% and 77.24% using the Bayesian classifier, depending on the training set size. The accuracy for the holdout test set was 89%. For the decision tree, the non-amyloidogenic prediction accuracy is 75.00%. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study indicates that both classification methods may be promising in providing straightforward predictions on the amyloidogenicity of a sequence. Nevertheless, the number of available sequences that satisfy the premises of this study are limited, and are consequently smaller than the ideal training set size. Increasing the size of the training set clearly increases the accuracy, and the expansion of the training set to include not only more derivatives, but more alignments, would make the method more sound. The accuracy of the classifiers may also be improved when additional factors, such as structural and physico-chemical data, are considered. The development of this type of classifier has significant applications in evaluating engineered antibodies, and may be adapted for evaluating engineered proteins in general. BioMed Central 2010-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3098112/ /pubmed/20144194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-79 Text en Copyright ©2010 David et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article David, Maria Pamela C Concepcion, Gisela P Padlan, Eduardo A Using simple artificial intelligence methods for predicting amyloidogenesis in antibodies |
title | Using simple artificial intelligence methods for predicting amyloidogenesis in antibodies |
title_full | Using simple artificial intelligence methods for predicting amyloidogenesis in antibodies |
title_fullStr | Using simple artificial intelligence methods for predicting amyloidogenesis in antibodies |
title_full_unstemmed | Using simple artificial intelligence methods for predicting amyloidogenesis in antibodies |
title_short | Using simple artificial intelligence methods for predicting amyloidogenesis in antibodies |
title_sort | using simple artificial intelligence methods for predicting amyloidogenesis in antibodies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3098112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20144194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-79 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidmariapamelac usingsimpleartificialintelligencemethodsforpredictingamyloidogenesisinantibodies AT concepciongiselap usingsimpleartificialintelligencemethodsforpredictingamyloidogenesisinantibodies AT padlaneduardoa usingsimpleartificialintelligencemethodsforpredictingamyloidogenesisinantibodies |