Cargando…

Promoter Methylation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines Is Significantly Different than Methylation in Primary Tumors and Xenografts

Studies designed to identify novel methylation events related to cancer often employ cancer cell lines in the discovery phase of the experiments and have a relatively low rate of discovery of cancer-related methylation events. An alternative algorithm for discovery of novel methylation in cancer use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hennessey, Patrick T., Ochs, Michael F., Mydlarz, Wojciech W., Hsueh, Wayne, Cope, Leslie, Yu, Wayne, Califano, Joseph A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21637785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020584
_version_ 1782204423162822656
author Hennessey, Patrick T.
Ochs, Michael F.
Mydlarz, Wojciech W.
Hsueh, Wayne
Cope, Leslie
Yu, Wayne
Califano, Joseph A.
author_facet Hennessey, Patrick T.
Ochs, Michael F.
Mydlarz, Wojciech W.
Hsueh, Wayne
Cope, Leslie
Yu, Wayne
Califano, Joseph A.
author_sort Hennessey, Patrick T.
collection PubMed
description Studies designed to identify novel methylation events related to cancer often employ cancer cell lines in the discovery phase of the experiments and have a relatively low rate of discovery of cancer-related methylation events. An alternative algorithm for discovery of novel methylation in cancer uses primary tumor-derived xenografts instead of cell lines as the primary source of nucleic acid for evaluation. We evaluated DNA extracted from primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), xenografts grown from these primary tumors in nude mice, HNSCC-derived cell lines, normal oral mucosal samples, and minimally transformed oral keratinocyte-derived cell lines using Illumina Infinum Humanmethylation 27 genome-wide methylation microarrays. We found >2,200 statistically significant methylation differences between cancer cell lines and primary tumors and when comparing normal oral mucosa to keratinocyte cell lines. We found no statistically significant promoter methylation differences between primary tumor xenografts and primary tumors. This study demonstrates that tumor-derived xenografts are highly accurate representations of promoter methylation in primary tumors and that cancer derived cell lines have significant drawbacks for discovery of promoter methylation alterations in primary tumors. These findings also support use of primary tumor xenografts for the study of methylation in cancer, drug discovery, and the development of personalized cancer treatments.
format Text
id pubmed-3102742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31027422011-06-02 Promoter Methylation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines Is Significantly Different than Methylation in Primary Tumors and Xenografts Hennessey, Patrick T. Ochs, Michael F. Mydlarz, Wojciech W. Hsueh, Wayne Cope, Leslie Yu, Wayne Califano, Joseph A. PLoS One Research Article Studies designed to identify novel methylation events related to cancer often employ cancer cell lines in the discovery phase of the experiments and have a relatively low rate of discovery of cancer-related methylation events. An alternative algorithm for discovery of novel methylation in cancer uses primary tumor-derived xenografts instead of cell lines as the primary source of nucleic acid for evaluation. We evaluated DNA extracted from primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), xenografts grown from these primary tumors in nude mice, HNSCC-derived cell lines, normal oral mucosal samples, and minimally transformed oral keratinocyte-derived cell lines using Illumina Infinum Humanmethylation 27 genome-wide methylation microarrays. We found >2,200 statistically significant methylation differences between cancer cell lines and primary tumors and when comparing normal oral mucosa to keratinocyte cell lines. We found no statistically significant promoter methylation differences between primary tumor xenografts and primary tumors. This study demonstrates that tumor-derived xenografts are highly accurate representations of promoter methylation in primary tumors and that cancer derived cell lines have significant drawbacks for discovery of promoter methylation alterations in primary tumors. These findings also support use of primary tumor xenografts for the study of methylation in cancer, drug discovery, and the development of personalized cancer treatments. Public Library of Science 2011-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3102742/ /pubmed/21637785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020584 Text en Hennessey et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hennessey, Patrick T.
Ochs, Michael F.
Mydlarz, Wojciech W.
Hsueh, Wayne
Cope, Leslie
Yu, Wayne
Califano, Joseph A.
Promoter Methylation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines Is Significantly Different than Methylation in Primary Tumors and Xenografts
title Promoter Methylation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines Is Significantly Different than Methylation in Primary Tumors and Xenografts
title_full Promoter Methylation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines Is Significantly Different than Methylation in Primary Tumors and Xenografts
title_fullStr Promoter Methylation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines Is Significantly Different than Methylation in Primary Tumors and Xenografts
title_full_unstemmed Promoter Methylation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines Is Significantly Different than Methylation in Primary Tumors and Xenografts
title_short Promoter Methylation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines Is Significantly Different than Methylation in Primary Tumors and Xenografts
title_sort promoter methylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines is significantly different than methylation in primary tumors and xenografts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21637785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020584
work_keys_str_mv AT hennesseypatrickt promotermethylationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomacelllinesissignificantlydifferentthanmethylationinprimarytumorsandxenografts
AT ochsmichaelf promotermethylationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomacelllinesissignificantlydifferentthanmethylationinprimarytumorsandxenografts
AT mydlarzwojciechw promotermethylationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomacelllinesissignificantlydifferentthanmethylationinprimarytumorsandxenografts
AT hsuehwayne promotermethylationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomacelllinesissignificantlydifferentthanmethylationinprimarytumorsandxenografts
AT copeleslie promotermethylationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomacelllinesissignificantlydifferentthanmethylationinprimarytumorsandxenografts
AT yuwayne promotermethylationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomacelllinesissignificantlydifferentthanmethylationinprimarytumorsandxenografts
AT califanojosepha promotermethylationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomacelllinesissignificantlydifferentthanmethylationinprimarytumorsandxenografts