Cargando…
Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm
Blepharospasm is a focal dystonia in which the extraocular muscles contract repetitively, leading to excessive blinking and forced eyelid closure. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is the primary symptomatic treatment for blepharospasm and its effects have been evaluated using numerous rating scales. T...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3104001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21221669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-010-0546-9 |
_version_ | 1782204581533450240 |
---|---|
author | Wabbels, Bettina Jost, Wolfgang H. Roggenkämper, Peter |
author_facet | Wabbels, Bettina Jost, Wolfgang H. Roggenkämper, Peter |
author_sort | Wabbels, Bettina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blepharospasm is a focal dystonia in which the extraocular muscles contract repetitively, leading to excessive blinking and forced eyelid closure. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is the primary symptomatic treatment for blepharospasm and its effects have been evaluated using numerous rating scales. The main scales in use today were initially used to determine whether BoNTA treatment was superior to placebo, and most controlled trials have confirmed this. More recently, these scales have been used to determine whether there are efficacy differences between different BoNTs in blepharospasm. However, although the scales used in these trials are able to differentiate the effects of BoNT from placebo, they may not be sensitive enough to differentiate between BoNTs. Most of the scales include only four possible points for each item, which would necessitate a 25% greater improvement in one group than the other to detect any differences. Current scales are also relatively insensitive to patients with mild disability who may experience mainly psychosocial problems related to their blepharospasm. Clinical trials comparing BoNTs that include substantial numbers of mildly affected patients may be unlikely to find differences because the scales do not adequately measure mild symptoms. Additional challenges with evaluating blepharospasm include the lack of precision and objectivity of current measures, symptom variability, the need to evaluate aspects of the disorder that are most important to patients, and the different types of blepharospasm. Although no single scale may be able to capture all relevant aspects of blepharospasm, more sensitive and patient-centered scales are needed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3104001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31040012011-07-14 Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm Wabbels, Bettina Jost, Wolfgang H. Roggenkämper, Peter J Neural Transm (Vienna) Movement Disorders - Review Article Blepharospasm is a focal dystonia in which the extraocular muscles contract repetitively, leading to excessive blinking and forced eyelid closure. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is the primary symptomatic treatment for blepharospasm and its effects have been evaluated using numerous rating scales. The main scales in use today were initially used to determine whether BoNTA treatment was superior to placebo, and most controlled trials have confirmed this. More recently, these scales have been used to determine whether there are efficacy differences between different BoNTs in blepharospasm. However, although the scales used in these trials are able to differentiate the effects of BoNT from placebo, they may not be sensitive enough to differentiate between BoNTs. Most of the scales include only four possible points for each item, which would necessitate a 25% greater improvement in one group than the other to detect any differences. Current scales are also relatively insensitive to patients with mild disability who may experience mainly psychosocial problems related to their blepharospasm. Clinical trials comparing BoNTs that include substantial numbers of mildly affected patients may be unlikely to find differences because the scales do not adequately measure mild symptoms. Additional challenges with evaluating blepharospasm include the lack of precision and objectivity of current measures, symptom variability, the need to evaluate aspects of the disorder that are most important to patients, and the different types of blepharospasm. Although no single scale may be able to capture all relevant aspects of blepharospasm, more sensitive and patient-centered scales are needed. Springer Vienna 2011-01-09 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3104001/ /pubmed/21221669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-010-0546-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Movement Disorders - Review Article Wabbels, Bettina Jost, Wolfgang H. Roggenkämper, Peter Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm |
title | Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm |
title_full | Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm |
title_fullStr | Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm |
title_full_unstemmed | Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm |
title_short | Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm |
title_sort | difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm |
topic | Movement Disorders - Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3104001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21221669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-010-0546-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wabbelsbettina difficultieswithdifferentiatingbotulinumtoxintreatmenteffectsinessentialblepharospasm AT jostwolfgangh difficultieswithdifferentiatingbotulinumtoxintreatmenteffectsinessentialblepharospasm AT roggenkamperpeter difficultieswithdifferentiatingbotulinumtoxintreatmenteffectsinessentialblepharospasm |