Cargando…

Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

BACKGROUND: The evidence that red and processed meat influences colorectal carcinogenesis was judged convincing in the 2007 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research report. Since then, ten prospective studies have published new results. Here we update the evidence from prospe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Doris S. M., Lau, Rosa, Aune, Dagfinn, Vieira, Rui, Greenwood, Darren C., Kampman, Ellen, Norat, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21674008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020456
_version_ 1782205393092476928
author Chan, Doris S. M.
Lau, Rosa
Aune, Dagfinn
Vieira, Rui
Greenwood, Darren C.
Kampman, Ellen
Norat, Teresa
author_facet Chan, Doris S. M.
Lau, Rosa
Aune, Dagfinn
Vieira, Rui
Greenwood, Darren C.
Kampman, Ellen
Norat, Teresa
author_sort Chan, Doris S. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The evidence that red and processed meat influences colorectal carcinogenesis was judged convincing in the 2007 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research report. Since then, ten prospective studies have published new results. Here we update the evidence from prospective studies and explore whether there is a non-linear association of red and processed meats with colorectal cancer risk. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Relevant prospective studies were identified in PubMed until March 2011. For each study, relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted and pooled with a random-effects model, weighting for the inverse of the variance, in highest versus lowest intake comparison, and dose-response meta-analyses. Red and processed meats intake was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. The summary relative risk (RR) of colorectal cancer for the highest versus the lowest intake was 1.22 (95% CI  = 1.11−1.34) and the RR for every 100 g/day increase was 1.14 (95% CI  = 1.04−1.24). Non-linear dose-response meta-analyses revealed that colorectal cancer risk increases approximately linearly with increasing intake of red and processed meats up to approximately 140 g/day, where the curve approaches its plateau. The associations were similar for colon and rectal cancer risk. When analyzed separately, colorectal cancer risk was related to intake of fresh red meat (RR( for 100 g/day increase)  = 1.17, 95% CI  = 1.05−1.31) and processed meat (RR (for 50 g/day increase)  = 1.18, 95% CI  = 1.10−1.28). Similar results were observed for colon cancer, but for rectal cancer, no significant associations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: High intake of red and processed meat is associated with significant increased risk of colorectal, colon and rectal cancers. The overall evidence of prospective studies supports limiting red and processed meat consumption as one of the dietary recommendations for the prevention of colorectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3108955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31089552011-06-13 Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies Chan, Doris S. M. Lau, Rosa Aune, Dagfinn Vieira, Rui Greenwood, Darren C. Kampman, Ellen Norat, Teresa PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The evidence that red and processed meat influences colorectal carcinogenesis was judged convincing in the 2007 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research report. Since then, ten prospective studies have published new results. Here we update the evidence from prospective studies and explore whether there is a non-linear association of red and processed meats with colorectal cancer risk. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Relevant prospective studies were identified in PubMed until March 2011. For each study, relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted and pooled with a random-effects model, weighting for the inverse of the variance, in highest versus lowest intake comparison, and dose-response meta-analyses. Red and processed meats intake was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. The summary relative risk (RR) of colorectal cancer for the highest versus the lowest intake was 1.22 (95% CI  = 1.11−1.34) and the RR for every 100 g/day increase was 1.14 (95% CI  = 1.04−1.24). Non-linear dose-response meta-analyses revealed that colorectal cancer risk increases approximately linearly with increasing intake of red and processed meats up to approximately 140 g/day, where the curve approaches its plateau. The associations were similar for colon and rectal cancer risk. When analyzed separately, colorectal cancer risk was related to intake of fresh red meat (RR( for 100 g/day increase)  = 1.17, 95% CI  = 1.05−1.31) and processed meat (RR (for 50 g/day increase)  = 1.18, 95% CI  = 1.10−1.28). Similar results were observed for colon cancer, but for rectal cancer, no significant associations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: High intake of red and processed meat is associated with significant increased risk of colorectal, colon and rectal cancers. The overall evidence of prospective studies supports limiting red and processed meat consumption as one of the dietary recommendations for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Public Library of Science 2011-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3108955/ /pubmed/21674008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020456 Text en Chan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chan, Doris S. M.
Lau, Rosa
Aune, Dagfinn
Vieira, Rui
Greenwood, Darren C.
Kampman, Ellen
Norat, Teresa
Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_full Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_fullStr Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_full_unstemmed Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_short Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_sort red and processed meat and colorectal cancer incidence: meta-analysis of prospective studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21674008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020456
work_keys_str_mv AT chandorissm redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT laurosa redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT aunedagfinn redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT vieirarui redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT greenwooddarrenc redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT kampmanellen redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT noratteresa redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies