Cargando…
Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience
BACKGROUND: In today's dynamic health-care system, organizations such as hospitals are required to improve their performance for multiple stakeholders and deliver an integrated care that means to work effectively, be innovative and organize efficiently. Achieved goals and levels of quality can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21586111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-9-7 |
_version_ | 1782206459462811648 |
---|---|
author | Lupi, Silvia Verzola, Adriano Carandina, Gianni Salani, Manuela Antonioli, Paola Gregorio, Pasquale |
author_facet | Lupi, Silvia Verzola, Adriano Carandina, Gianni Salani, Manuela Antonioli, Paola Gregorio, Pasquale |
author_sort | Lupi, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In today's dynamic health-care system, organizations such as hospitals are required to improve their performance for multiple stakeholders and deliver an integrated care that means to work effectively, be innovative and organize efficiently. Achieved goals and levels of quality can be successfully measured by a multidimensional approach like Balanced Scorecard (BSC). The aim of the study was to verify the opportunity to introduce BSC framework to measure performance in St. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, applying it to the Clinical Laboratory Operative Unit in order to compare over time performance results and achievements of assigned targets. METHODS: In the first experience with BSC we distinguished four perspectives, according to Kaplan and Norton, identified Key Performance Areas and Key Performance Indicators, set standards and weights for each objective, collected data for all indicators, recognized cause-and-effect relationships in a strategic map. One year later we proceeded with the next data collection and analysed the preservation of framework aptitude to measure Operative Unit performance. In addition, we verified the ability to underline links between strategic actions belonging to different perspectives in producing outcomes changes. RESULTS: The BSC was found to be effective for underlining existing problems and identifying opportunities for improvements. The BSC also revealed the specific perspective contribution to overall performance enhancement. After time results comparison was possible depending on the selection of feasible and appropriate key performance indicators, which was occasionally limited by data collection problems. CONCLUSIONS: The first use of BSC to compare performance at Operative Unit level, in course of time, suggested this framework can be successfully adopted for results measuring and revealing effective health factors, allowing health-care quality improvements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3118336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31183362011-06-20 Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience Lupi, Silvia Verzola, Adriano Carandina, Gianni Salani, Manuela Antonioli, Paola Gregorio, Pasquale Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: In today's dynamic health-care system, organizations such as hospitals are required to improve their performance for multiple stakeholders and deliver an integrated care that means to work effectively, be innovative and organize efficiently. Achieved goals and levels of quality can be successfully measured by a multidimensional approach like Balanced Scorecard (BSC). The aim of the study was to verify the opportunity to introduce BSC framework to measure performance in St. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, applying it to the Clinical Laboratory Operative Unit in order to compare over time performance results and achievements of assigned targets. METHODS: In the first experience with BSC we distinguished four perspectives, according to Kaplan and Norton, identified Key Performance Areas and Key Performance Indicators, set standards and weights for each objective, collected data for all indicators, recognized cause-and-effect relationships in a strategic map. One year later we proceeded with the next data collection and analysed the preservation of framework aptitude to measure Operative Unit performance. In addition, we verified the ability to underline links between strategic actions belonging to different perspectives in producing outcomes changes. RESULTS: The BSC was found to be effective for underlining existing problems and identifying opportunities for improvements. The BSC also revealed the specific perspective contribution to overall performance enhancement. After time results comparison was possible depending on the selection of feasible and appropriate key performance indicators, which was occasionally limited by data collection problems. CONCLUSIONS: The first use of BSC to compare performance at Operative Unit level, in course of time, suggested this framework can be successfully adopted for results measuring and revealing effective health factors, allowing health-care quality improvements. BioMed Central 2011-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3118336/ /pubmed/21586111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-9-7 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lupi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Lupi, Silvia Verzola, Adriano Carandina, Gianni Salani, Manuela Antonioli, Paola Gregorio, Pasquale Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience |
title | Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience |
title_full | Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience |
title_fullStr | Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience |
title_short | Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience |
title_sort | multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21586111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-9-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lupisilvia multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience AT verzolaadriano multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience AT carandinagianni multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience AT salanimanuela multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience AT antoniolipaola multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience AT gregoriopasquale multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience |