Cargando…

Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience

BACKGROUND: In today's dynamic health-care system, organizations such as hospitals are required to improve their performance for multiple stakeholders and deliver an integrated care that means to work effectively, be innovative and organize efficiently. Achieved goals and levels of quality can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lupi, Silvia, Verzola, Adriano, Carandina, Gianni, Salani, Manuela, Antonioli, Paola, Gregorio, Pasquale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21586111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-9-7
_version_ 1782206459462811648
author Lupi, Silvia
Verzola, Adriano
Carandina, Gianni
Salani, Manuela
Antonioli, Paola
Gregorio, Pasquale
author_facet Lupi, Silvia
Verzola, Adriano
Carandina, Gianni
Salani, Manuela
Antonioli, Paola
Gregorio, Pasquale
author_sort Lupi, Silvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In today's dynamic health-care system, organizations such as hospitals are required to improve their performance for multiple stakeholders and deliver an integrated care that means to work effectively, be innovative and organize efficiently. Achieved goals and levels of quality can be successfully measured by a multidimensional approach like Balanced Scorecard (BSC). The aim of the study was to verify the opportunity to introduce BSC framework to measure performance in St. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, applying it to the Clinical Laboratory Operative Unit in order to compare over time performance results and achievements of assigned targets. METHODS: In the first experience with BSC we distinguished four perspectives, according to Kaplan and Norton, identified Key Performance Areas and Key Performance Indicators, set standards and weights for each objective, collected data for all indicators, recognized cause-and-effect relationships in a strategic map. One year later we proceeded with the next data collection and analysed the preservation of framework aptitude to measure Operative Unit performance. In addition, we verified the ability to underline links between strategic actions belonging to different perspectives in producing outcomes changes. RESULTS: The BSC was found to be effective for underlining existing problems and identifying opportunities for improvements. The BSC also revealed the specific perspective contribution to overall performance enhancement. After time results comparison was possible depending on the selection of feasible and appropriate key performance indicators, which was occasionally limited by data collection problems. CONCLUSIONS: The first use of BSC to compare performance at Operative Unit level, in course of time, suggested this framework can be successfully adopted for results measuring and revealing effective health factors, allowing health-care quality improvements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3118336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31183362011-06-20 Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience Lupi, Silvia Verzola, Adriano Carandina, Gianni Salani, Manuela Antonioli, Paola Gregorio, Pasquale Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: In today's dynamic health-care system, organizations such as hospitals are required to improve their performance for multiple stakeholders and deliver an integrated care that means to work effectively, be innovative and organize efficiently. Achieved goals and levels of quality can be successfully measured by a multidimensional approach like Balanced Scorecard (BSC). The aim of the study was to verify the opportunity to introduce BSC framework to measure performance in St. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, applying it to the Clinical Laboratory Operative Unit in order to compare over time performance results and achievements of assigned targets. METHODS: In the first experience with BSC we distinguished four perspectives, according to Kaplan and Norton, identified Key Performance Areas and Key Performance Indicators, set standards and weights for each objective, collected data for all indicators, recognized cause-and-effect relationships in a strategic map. One year later we proceeded with the next data collection and analysed the preservation of framework aptitude to measure Operative Unit performance. In addition, we verified the ability to underline links between strategic actions belonging to different perspectives in producing outcomes changes. RESULTS: The BSC was found to be effective for underlining existing problems and identifying opportunities for improvements. The BSC also revealed the specific perspective contribution to overall performance enhancement. After time results comparison was possible depending on the selection of feasible and appropriate key performance indicators, which was occasionally limited by data collection problems. CONCLUSIONS: The first use of BSC to compare performance at Operative Unit level, in course of time, suggested this framework can be successfully adopted for results measuring and revealing effective health factors, allowing health-care quality improvements. BioMed Central 2011-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3118336/ /pubmed/21586111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-9-7 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lupi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lupi, Silvia
Verzola, Adriano
Carandina, Gianni
Salani, Manuela
Antonioli, Paola
Gregorio, Pasquale
Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience
title Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience
title_full Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience
title_fullStr Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience
title_full_unstemmed Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience
title_short Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience
title_sort multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: a two year experience
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21586111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-9-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lupisilvia multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience
AT verzolaadriano multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience
AT carandinagianni multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience
AT salanimanuela multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience
AT antoniolipaola multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience
AT gregoriopasquale multidimensionalevaluationofperformancewithexperimentalapplicationofbalancedscorecardatwoyearexperience