Cargando…

Joining the dots: Conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress

BACKGROUND: Programmatic assessment that looks across a whole year may contribute to better decisions compared with those made from isolated assessments alone. The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate a programmatic system to handle student assessment results that is aligned not only with l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilkinson, Tim J, Tweed, Mike J, Egan, Tony G, Ali, Anthony N, McKenzie, Jan M, Moore, MaryLeigh, Rudland, Joy R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3121726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21649925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-29
_version_ 1782206859388649472
author Wilkinson, Tim J
Tweed, Mike J
Egan, Tony G
Ali, Anthony N
McKenzie, Jan M
Moore, MaryLeigh
Rudland, Joy R
author_facet Wilkinson, Tim J
Tweed, Mike J
Egan, Tony G
Ali, Anthony N
McKenzie, Jan M
Moore, MaryLeigh
Rudland, Joy R
author_sort Wilkinson, Tim J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Programmatic assessment that looks across a whole year may contribute to better decisions compared with those made from isolated assessments alone. The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate a programmatic system to handle student assessment results that is aligned not only with learning and remediation, but also with defensibility. The key components are standards based assessments, use of "Conditional Pass", and regular progress meetings. METHODS: The new assessment system is described. The evaluation is based on years 4-6 of a 6-year medical course. The types of concerns staff had about students were clustered into themes alongside any interventions and outcomes for the students concerned. The likelihoods of passing the year according to type of problem were compared before and after phasing in of the new assessment system. RESULTS: The new system was phased in over four years. In the fourth year of implementation 701 students had 3539 assessment results, of which 4.1% were Conditional Pass. More in-depth analysis for 1516 results available from 447 students revealed the odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) for failure was highest for students with problems identified in more than one part of the course (18.8 (7.7-46.2) p < 0.0001) or with problems with professionalism (17.2 (9.1-33.3) p < 0.0001). The odds ratio for failure was lowest for problems with assignments (0.7 (0.1-5.2) NS). Compared with the previous system, more students failed the year under the new system on the basis of performance during the year (20 or 4.5% compared with four or 1.1% under the previous system (p < 0.01)). CONCLUSIONS: The new system detects more students in difficulty and has resulted in less "failure to fail". The requirement to state conditions required to pass has contributed to a paper trail that should improve defensibility. Most importantly it has helped detect and act on some of the more difficult areas to assess such as professionalism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3121726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31217262011-06-24 Joining the dots: Conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress Wilkinson, Tim J Tweed, Mike J Egan, Tony G Ali, Anthony N McKenzie, Jan M Moore, MaryLeigh Rudland, Joy R BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Programmatic assessment that looks across a whole year may contribute to better decisions compared with those made from isolated assessments alone. The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate a programmatic system to handle student assessment results that is aligned not only with learning and remediation, but also with defensibility. The key components are standards based assessments, use of "Conditional Pass", and regular progress meetings. METHODS: The new assessment system is described. The evaluation is based on years 4-6 of a 6-year medical course. The types of concerns staff had about students were clustered into themes alongside any interventions and outcomes for the students concerned. The likelihoods of passing the year according to type of problem were compared before and after phasing in of the new assessment system. RESULTS: The new system was phased in over four years. In the fourth year of implementation 701 students had 3539 assessment results, of which 4.1% were Conditional Pass. More in-depth analysis for 1516 results available from 447 students revealed the odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) for failure was highest for students with problems identified in more than one part of the course (18.8 (7.7-46.2) p < 0.0001) or with problems with professionalism (17.2 (9.1-33.3) p < 0.0001). The odds ratio for failure was lowest for problems with assignments (0.7 (0.1-5.2) NS). Compared with the previous system, more students failed the year under the new system on the basis of performance during the year (20 or 4.5% compared with four or 1.1% under the previous system (p < 0.01)). CONCLUSIONS: The new system detects more students in difficulty and has resulted in less "failure to fail". The requirement to state conditions required to pass has contributed to a paper trail that should improve defensibility. Most importantly it has helped detect and act on some of the more difficult areas to assess such as professionalism. BioMed Central 2011-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3121726/ /pubmed/21649925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-29 Text en Copyright ©2011 Wilkinson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilkinson, Tim J
Tweed, Mike J
Egan, Tony G
Ali, Anthony N
McKenzie, Jan M
Moore, MaryLeigh
Rudland, Joy R
Joining the dots: Conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress
title Joining the dots: Conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress
title_full Joining the dots: Conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress
title_fullStr Joining the dots: Conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress
title_full_unstemmed Joining the dots: Conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress
title_short Joining the dots: Conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress
title_sort joining the dots: conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3121726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21649925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-29
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkinsontimj joiningthedotsconditionalpassandprogrammaticassessmentenhancesrecognitionofproblemswithprofessionalismandfactorshamperingstudentprogress
AT tweedmikej joiningthedotsconditionalpassandprogrammaticassessmentenhancesrecognitionofproblemswithprofessionalismandfactorshamperingstudentprogress
AT egantonyg joiningthedotsconditionalpassandprogrammaticassessmentenhancesrecognitionofproblemswithprofessionalismandfactorshamperingstudentprogress
AT alianthonyn joiningthedotsconditionalpassandprogrammaticassessmentenhancesrecognitionofproblemswithprofessionalismandfactorshamperingstudentprogress
AT mckenziejanm joiningthedotsconditionalpassandprogrammaticassessmentenhancesrecognitionofproblemswithprofessionalismandfactorshamperingstudentprogress
AT mooremaryleigh joiningthedotsconditionalpassandprogrammaticassessmentenhancesrecognitionofproblemswithprofessionalismandfactorshamperingstudentprogress
AT rudlandjoyr joiningthedotsconditionalpassandprogrammaticassessmentenhancesrecognitionofproblemswithprofessionalismandfactorshamperingstudentprogress