Cargando…

Protein-network modeling of prostate cancer gene signatures reveals essential pathways in disease recurrence

OBJECTIVE: Uncovering the dominant molecular deregulation among the multitude of pathways implicated in aggressive prostate cancer is essential to intelligently developing targeted therapies. Paradoxically, published prostate cancer gene expression signatures of poor prognosis share little overlap a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, James L, Li, Jianrong, Stadler, Walter M, Lussier, Yves A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3128407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000178
_version_ 1782207442198724608
author Chen, James L
Li, Jianrong
Stadler, Walter M
Lussier, Yves A
author_facet Chen, James L
Li, Jianrong
Stadler, Walter M
Lussier, Yves A
author_sort Chen, James L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Uncovering the dominant molecular deregulation among the multitude of pathways implicated in aggressive prostate cancer is essential to intelligently developing targeted therapies. Paradoxically, published prostate cancer gene expression signatures of poor prognosis share little overlap and thus do not reveal shared mechanisms. The authors hypothesize that, by analyzing gene signatures with quantitative models of protein–protein interactions, key pathways will be elucidated and shown to be shared. DESIGN: The authors statistically prioritized common interactors between established cancer genes and genes from each prostate cancer signature of poor prognosis independently via a previously validated single protein analysis of network (SPAN) methodology. Additionally, they computationally identified pathways among the aggregated interactors across signatures and validated them using a similarity metric and patient survival. MEASUREMENT: Using an information-theoretic metric, the authors assessed the mechanistic similarity of the interactor signature. Its prognostic ability was assessed in an independent cohort of 198 patients with high-Gleason prostate cancer using Kaplan–Meier analysis. RESULTS: Of the 13 prostate cancer signatures that were evaluated, eight interacted significantly with established cancer genes (false discovery rate <5%) and generated a 42-gene interactor signature that showed the highest mechanistic similarity (p<0.0001). Via parameter-free unsupervised classification, the interactor signature dichotomized the independent prostate cancer cohort with a significant survival difference (p=0.009). Interpretation of the network not only recapitulated phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/NF-κB signaling, but also highlighted less well established relevant pathways such as the Janus kinase 2 cascade. CONCLUSIONS: SPAN methodolgy provides a robust means of abstracting disparate prostate cancer gene expression signatures into clinically useful, prioritized pathways as well as useful mechanistic pathways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3128407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31284072011-07-05 Protein-network modeling of prostate cancer gene signatures reveals essential pathways in disease recurrence Chen, James L Li, Jianrong Stadler, Walter M Lussier, Yves A J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications OBJECTIVE: Uncovering the dominant molecular deregulation among the multitude of pathways implicated in aggressive prostate cancer is essential to intelligently developing targeted therapies. Paradoxically, published prostate cancer gene expression signatures of poor prognosis share little overlap and thus do not reveal shared mechanisms. The authors hypothesize that, by analyzing gene signatures with quantitative models of protein–protein interactions, key pathways will be elucidated and shown to be shared. DESIGN: The authors statistically prioritized common interactors between established cancer genes and genes from each prostate cancer signature of poor prognosis independently via a previously validated single protein analysis of network (SPAN) methodology. Additionally, they computationally identified pathways among the aggregated interactors across signatures and validated them using a similarity metric and patient survival. MEASUREMENT: Using an information-theoretic metric, the authors assessed the mechanistic similarity of the interactor signature. Its prognostic ability was assessed in an independent cohort of 198 patients with high-Gleason prostate cancer using Kaplan–Meier analysis. RESULTS: Of the 13 prostate cancer signatures that were evaluated, eight interacted significantly with established cancer genes (false discovery rate <5%) and generated a 42-gene interactor signature that showed the highest mechanistic similarity (p<0.0001). Via parameter-free unsupervised classification, the interactor signature dichotomized the independent prostate cancer cohort with a significant survival difference (p=0.009). Interpretation of the network not only recapitulated phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/NF-κB signaling, but also highlighted less well established relevant pathways such as the Janus kinase 2 cascade. CONCLUSIONS: SPAN methodolgy provides a robust means of abstracting disparate prostate cancer gene expression signatures into clinically useful, prioritized pathways as well as useful mechanistic pathways. BMJ Group 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3128407/ /pubmed/21672909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000178 Text en © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research and Applications
Chen, James L
Li, Jianrong
Stadler, Walter M
Lussier, Yves A
Protein-network modeling of prostate cancer gene signatures reveals essential pathways in disease recurrence
title Protein-network modeling of prostate cancer gene signatures reveals essential pathways in disease recurrence
title_full Protein-network modeling of prostate cancer gene signatures reveals essential pathways in disease recurrence
title_fullStr Protein-network modeling of prostate cancer gene signatures reveals essential pathways in disease recurrence
title_full_unstemmed Protein-network modeling of prostate cancer gene signatures reveals essential pathways in disease recurrence
title_short Protein-network modeling of prostate cancer gene signatures reveals essential pathways in disease recurrence
title_sort protein-network modeling of prostate cancer gene signatures reveals essential pathways in disease recurrence
topic Research and Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3128407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000178
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjamesl proteinnetworkmodelingofprostatecancergenesignaturesrevealsessentialpathwaysindiseaserecurrence
AT lijianrong proteinnetworkmodelingofprostatecancergenesignaturesrevealsessentialpathwaysindiseaserecurrence
AT stadlerwalterm proteinnetworkmodelingofprostatecancergenesignaturesrevealsessentialpathwaysindiseaserecurrence
AT lussieryvesa proteinnetworkmodelingofprostatecancergenesignaturesrevealsessentialpathwaysindiseaserecurrence