Cargando…

Why CCR2 and CCR5 Blockade Failed and Why CCR1 Blockade Might Still Be Effective in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide more insight into the question as to why blockade of CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 may have failed in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, using an in vitro monocyte migration system model. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Monocytes from healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lebre, Maria C., Vergunst, Clarissa E., Choi, Ivy Y. K., Aarrass, Saïda, Oliveira, Ana S. F., Wyant, Tim, Horuk, Richard, Reedquist, Kris A., Tak, Paul P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3128605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021772
_version_ 1782207457337016320
author Lebre, Maria C.
Vergunst, Clarissa E.
Choi, Ivy Y. K.
Aarrass, Saïda
Oliveira, Ana S. F.
Wyant, Tim
Horuk, Richard
Reedquist, Kris A.
Tak, Paul P.
author_facet Lebre, Maria C.
Vergunst, Clarissa E.
Choi, Ivy Y. K.
Aarrass, Saïda
Oliveira, Ana S. F.
Wyant, Tim
Horuk, Richard
Reedquist, Kris A.
Tak, Paul P.
author_sort Lebre, Maria C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide more insight into the question as to why blockade of CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 may have failed in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, using an in vitro monocyte migration system model. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Monocytes from healthy donors (HD; n = 8) or from RA patients (for CCR2 and CCR5 antibody n = 8; for CCR1 blockade n = 13) were isolated from peripheral blood and pre-incubated with different concentrations of either anti-CCR1, anti-CCR2, or anti-CCR5 blocking antibodies (or medium or isotype controls). In addition, a small molecule CCR1 antagonist (BX471) was tested. Chemotaxis was induced by CCL2/MCP-1 (CCR2 ligand), CCL5/RANTES (CCR1 and CCR5 ligand), or by a mix of 5 RA synovial fluids (SFs), and cellular responses compared to chemotaxis in the presence of medium alone. Anti-CCR2 antibody treatment blocked CCL2/MCP-1-induced chemotaxis of both HD and RA monocytes compared to isotype control. Similarly, anti-CCR5 antibody treatment blocked CCL5/RANTES-induced chemotaxis of RA monocytes. While neither CCR2 nor CCR5 blocking antibodies were able to inhibit SF-induced monocyte chemotaxis, even when both receptors were blocked simultaneously, both anti-CCR1 antibodies and the CCR1 antagonist were able to inhibit SF-induced monocyte chemotaxis. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The RA synovial compartment contains several ligands for CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 as well as other chemokines and receptors involved in monocyte recruitment to the site of inflammation. The results suggest that CCR2 and CCR5 are not critical for the migration of monocytes towards the synovial compartment in RA. In contrast, blockade of CCR1 may be effective. Conceivably, CCR1 blockade failed in clinical trials, not because CCR1 is not a good target, but because very high levels of receptor occupancy at all times may be needed to inhibit monocyte migration in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3128605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31286052011-07-11 Why CCR2 and CCR5 Blockade Failed and Why CCR1 Blockade Might Still Be Effective in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Lebre, Maria C. Vergunst, Clarissa E. Choi, Ivy Y. K. Aarrass, Saïda Oliveira, Ana S. F. Wyant, Tim Horuk, Richard Reedquist, Kris A. Tak, Paul P. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide more insight into the question as to why blockade of CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 may have failed in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, using an in vitro monocyte migration system model. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Monocytes from healthy donors (HD; n = 8) or from RA patients (for CCR2 and CCR5 antibody n = 8; for CCR1 blockade n = 13) were isolated from peripheral blood and pre-incubated with different concentrations of either anti-CCR1, anti-CCR2, or anti-CCR5 blocking antibodies (or medium or isotype controls). In addition, a small molecule CCR1 antagonist (BX471) was tested. Chemotaxis was induced by CCL2/MCP-1 (CCR2 ligand), CCL5/RANTES (CCR1 and CCR5 ligand), or by a mix of 5 RA synovial fluids (SFs), and cellular responses compared to chemotaxis in the presence of medium alone. Anti-CCR2 antibody treatment blocked CCL2/MCP-1-induced chemotaxis of both HD and RA monocytes compared to isotype control. Similarly, anti-CCR5 antibody treatment blocked CCL5/RANTES-induced chemotaxis of RA monocytes. While neither CCR2 nor CCR5 blocking antibodies were able to inhibit SF-induced monocyte chemotaxis, even when both receptors were blocked simultaneously, both anti-CCR1 antibodies and the CCR1 antagonist were able to inhibit SF-induced monocyte chemotaxis. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The RA synovial compartment contains several ligands for CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 as well as other chemokines and receptors involved in monocyte recruitment to the site of inflammation. The results suggest that CCR2 and CCR5 are not critical for the migration of monocytes towards the synovial compartment in RA. In contrast, blockade of CCR1 may be effective. Conceivably, CCR1 blockade failed in clinical trials, not because CCR1 is not a good target, but because very high levels of receptor occupancy at all times may be needed to inhibit monocyte migration in vivo. Public Library of Science 2011-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3128605/ /pubmed/21747955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021772 Text en Lebre et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lebre, Maria C.
Vergunst, Clarissa E.
Choi, Ivy Y. K.
Aarrass, Saïda
Oliveira, Ana S. F.
Wyant, Tim
Horuk, Richard
Reedquist, Kris A.
Tak, Paul P.
Why CCR2 and CCR5 Blockade Failed and Why CCR1 Blockade Might Still Be Effective in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
title Why CCR2 and CCR5 Blockade Failed and Why CCR1 Blockade Might Still Be Effective in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full Why CCR2 and CCR5 Blockade Failed and Why CCR1 Blockade Might Still Be Effective in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_fullStr Why CCR2 and CCR5 Blockade Failed and Why CCR1 Blockade Might Still Be Effective in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Why CCR2 and CCR5 Blockade Failed and Why CCR1 Blockade Might Still Be Effective in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_short Why CCR2 and CCR5 Blockade Failed and Why CCR1 Blockade Might Still Be Effective in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_sort why ccr2 and ccr5 blockade failed and why ccr1 blockade might still be effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3128605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021772
work_keys_str_mv AT lebremariac whyccr2andccr5blockadefailedandwhyccr1blockademightstillbeeffectiveinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
AT vergunstclarissae whyccr2andccr5blockadefailedandwhyccr1blockademightstillbeeffectiveinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
AT choiivyyk whyccr2andccr5blockadefailedandwhyccr1blockademightstillbeeffectiveinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
AT aarrasssaida whyccr2andccr5blockadefailedandwhyccr1blockademightstillbeeffectiveinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
AT oliveiraanasf whyccr2andccr5blockadefailedandwhyccr1blockademightstillbeeffectiveinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
AT wyanttim whyccr2andccr5blockadefailedandwhyccr1blockademightstillbeeffectiveinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
AT horukrichard whyccr2andccr5blockadefailedandwhyccr1blockademightstillbeeffectiveinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
AT reedquistkrisa whyccr2andccr5blockadefailedandwhyccr1blockademightstillbeeffectiveinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis
AT takpaulp whyccr2andccr5blockadefailedandwhyccr1blockademightstillbeeffectiveinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritis