Cargando…

A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Scheffer, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818223
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000720
_version_ 1782208555750785024
author Scheffer, Christian
author_facet Scheffer, Christian
author_sort Scheffer, Christian
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3140391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31403912011-08-04 A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009) Scheffer, Christian GMS Z Med Ausbild Article German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2011-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3140391/ /pubmed/21818223 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000720 Text en Copyright © 2011 Scheffer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Scheffer, Christian
A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)
title A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)
title_full A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)
title_fullStr A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)
title_full_unstemmed A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)
title_short A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)
title_sort summary and commentary on smith et al.'s "why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (science 2009)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818223
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000720
work_keys_str_mv AT schefferchristian asummaryandcommentaryonsmithetalswhypeerdiscussionimprovesstudentperformanceoninclassconceptquestionsscience2009
AT schefferchristian summaryandcommentaryonsmithetalswhypeerdiscussionimprovesstudentperformanceoninclassconceptquestionsscience2009