Cargando…

Real patient learning integrated in a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. Does it make a difference?

Although musculoskeletal disorders are the most common reason for general practitioner visits, training did not keep pace. Implementation of learning from patients with rheumatologic disorders linked together with the teaching of theoretical knowledge in the preclinical medical education might be an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Boer, Anne, Melchers, Debbie, Vink, Sylvia, Dekker, Friedo, Beaart, Liesbeth, de Jong, Zuzana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-011-1708-3
_version_ 1782209070849064960
author de Boer, Anne
Melchers, Debbie
Vink, Sylvia
Dekker, Friedo
Beaart, Liesbeth
de Jong, Zuzana
author_facet de Boer, Anne
Melchers, Debbie
Vink, Sylvia
Dekker, Friedo
Beaart, Liesbeth
de Jong, Zuzana
author_sort de Boer, Anne
collection PubMed
description Although musculoskeletal disorders are the most common reason for general practitioner visits, training did not keep pace. Implementation of learning from patients with rheumatologic disorders linked together with the teaching of theoretical knowledge in the preclinical medical education might be an important step forward in the improvement of quality of care for these patients. The Leiden Medical School curriculum has implemented two non-obligatory real patient learning (RPL) practicals integrated within the preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. This study investigates the educational effectiveness of the practicals, the expectations students have of RPL, and students’ satisfaction. Participants’ grades on the end-of-block test served as the test results of the educational effectiveness of the practicals and were compared with those of the non-participants. Qualitative data was collected by means of questionnaires generated by focus groups. The participants in practicals scored significantly higher at the end-of-block test. The expected effects of the contact with real patients concerned positive effects on cognition and skills. ‘Contextualizing of the theory’, ‘better memorizing of clinical pictures’, and ‘understanding of the impact of the disease’ were the most frequently mentioned effects of the practicals. Overall, the participants were (very) enthusiastic about this educational format. The RPL practicals integrated within a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders are a valuable addition to the Leiden medical curriculum. This relatively limited intervention exhibits a strong effect on students’ performance in tests. Future research should be directed towards the long-term effects of this intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3145092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31450922011-09-21 Real patient learning integrated in a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. Does it make a difference? de Boer, Anne Melchers, Debbie Vink, Sylvia Dekker, Friedo Beaart, Liesbeth de Jong, Zuzana Clin Rheumatol Original Article Although musculoskeletal disorders are the most common reason for general practitioner visits, training did not keep pace. Implementation of learning from patients with rheumatologic disorders linked together with the teaching of theoretical knowledge in the preclinical medical education might be an important step forward in the improvement of quality of care for these patients. The Leiden Medical School curriculum has implemented two non-obligatory real patient learning (RPL) practicals integrated within the preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. This study investigates the educational effectiveness of the practicals, the expectations students have of RPL, and students’ satisfaction. Participants’ grades on the end-of-block test served as the test results of the educational effectiveness of the practicals and were compared with those of the non-participants. Qualitative data was collected by means of questionnaires generated by focus groups. The participants in practicals scored significantly higher at the end-of-block test. The expected effects of the contact with real patients concerned positive effects on cognition and skills. ‘Contextualizing of the theory’, ‘better memorizing of clinical pictures’, and ‘understanding of the impact of the disease’ were the most frequently mentioned effects of the practicals. Overall, the participants were (very) enthusiastic about this educational format. The RPL practicals integrated within a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders are a valuable addition to the Leiden medical curriculum. This relatively limited intervention exhibits a strong effect on students’ performance in tests. Future research should be directed towards the long-term effects of this intervention. Springer-Verlag 2011-02-24 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3145092/ /pubmed/21347603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-011-1708-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
de Boer, Anne
Melchers, Debbie
Vink, Sylvia
Dekker, Friedo
Beaart, Liesbeth
de Jong, Zuzana
Real patient learning integrated in a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. Does it make a difference?
title Real patient learning integrated in a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. Does it make a difference?
title_full Real patient learning integrated in a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. Does it make a difference?
title_fullStr Real patient learning integrated in a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. Does it make a difference?
title_full_unstemmed Real patient learning integrated in a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. Does it make a difference?
title_short Real patient learning integrated in a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. Does it make a difference?
title_sort real patient learning integrated in a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. does it make a difference?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-011-1708-3
work_keys_str_mv AT deboeranne realpatientlearningintegratedinapreclinicalblockmusculoskeletaldisordersdoesitmakeadifference
AT melchersdebbie realpatientlearningintegratedinapreclinicalblockmusculoskeletaldisordersdoesitmakeadifference
AT vinksylvia realpatientlearningintegratedinapreclinicalblockmusculoskeletaldisordersdoesitmakeadifference
AT dekkerfriedo realpatientlearningintegratedinapreclinicalblockmusculoskeletaldisordersdoesitmakeadifference
AT beaartliesbeth realpatientlearningintegratedinapreclinicalblockmusculoskeletaldisordersdoesitmakeadifference
AT dejongzuzana realpatientlearningintegratedinapreclinicalblockmusculoskeletaldisordersdoesitmakeadifference