Cargando…

Development of a questionnaire to assess medical competencies: Reliability and validity of the Questionnaire

Introduction: While preparing a graduate survey for medical education in 2008 we realized that no instrument existed that would be suitable to evaluate whether the learning outcomes outlined in the Medical Licensure Act (ÄAppO) would be met. Therefore we developed the Freiburg Questionnaire to Asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giesler, Marianne, Forster, Johannes, Biller, Silke, Fabry, Götz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000743
_version_ 1782209452014829568
author Giesler, Marianne
Forster, Johannes
Biller, Silke
Fabry, Götz
author_facet Giesler, Marianne
Forster, Johannes
Biller, Silke
Fabry, Götz
author_sort Giesler, Marianne
collection PubMed
description Introduction: While preparing a graduate survey for medical education in 2008 we realized that no instrument existed that would be suitable to evaluate whether the learning outcomes outlined in the Medical Licensure Act (ÄAppO) would be met. Therefore we developed the Freiburg Questionnaire to Assess Competencies in Medicine (Freiburger Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Kompetenzen in der Medizin, FKM)(1) which has been revised and extended several times since then. Currently the FKM includes 45 items which are assigned to nine domains that correspond to the CanMEDS roles: medical expertise, communication, team-work, health and prevention, management, professionalism, learning, scholarship, and personal competencies. Methods: In order to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire we have repeatedly surveyed medical students and residents since May 2008. In this article we report on the results of a cross-sectional study with 698 medical students from the preclinical and clinical years. In addition, we report the results of a survey of 514 residents who were up to two years into their residency. Results and conclusions: In summary, results show that the scales of the FKM are reliable (Cronbach’s α between .68 and .97). Significant differences in means between selected groups of students support the measure’s construct validity. Furthermore, there is evidence that the FKM might be used as a screening tool e.g. in graduate surveys to identify weaknesses in the medical education curriculum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3149468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31494682011-08-04 Development of a questionnaire to assess medical competencies: Reliability and validity of the Questionnaire Giesler, Marianne Forster, Johannes Biller, Silke Fabry, Götz GMS Z Med Ausbild Article Introduction: While preparing a graduate survey for medical education in 2008 we realized that no instrument existed that would be suitable to evaluate whether the learning outcomes outlined in the Medical Licensure Act (ÄAppO) would be met. Therefore we developed the Freiburg Questionnaire to Assess Competencies in Medicine (Freiburger Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Kompetenzen in der Medizin, FKM)(1) which has been revised and extended several times since then. Currently the FKM includes 45 items which are assigned to nine domains that correspond to the CanMEDS roles: medical expertise, communication, team-work, health and prevention, management, professionalism, learning, scholarship, and personal competencies. Methods: In order to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire we have repeatedly surveyed medical students and residents since May 2008. In this article we report on the results of a cross-sectional study with 698 medical students from the preclinical and clinical years. In addition, we report the results of a survey of 514 residents who were up to two years into their residency. Results and conclusions: In summary, results show that the scales of the FKM are reliable (Cronbach’s α between .68 and .97). Significant differences in means between selected groups of students support the measure’s construct validity. Furthermore, there is evidence that the FKM might be used as a screening tool e.g. in graduate surveys to identify weaknesses in the medical education curriculum. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2011-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3149468/ /pubmed/21818241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000743 Text en Copyright © 2011 Giesler et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Giesler, Marianne
Forster, Johannes
Biller, Silke
Fabry, Götz
Development of a questionnaire to assess medical competencies: Reliability and validity of the Questionnaire
title Development of a questionnaire to assess medical competencies: Reliability and validity of the Questionnaire
title_full Development of a questionnaire to assess medical competencies: Reliability and validity of the Questionnaire
title_fullStr Development of a questionnaire to assess medical competencies: Reliability and validity of the Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Development of a questionnaire to assess medical competencies: Reliability and validity of the Questionnaire
title_short Development of a questionnaire to assess medical competencies: Reliability and validity of the Questionnaire
title_sort development of a questionnaire to assess medical competencies: reliability and validity of the questionnaire
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000743
work_keys_str_mv AT gieslermarianne developmentofaquestionnairetoassessmedicalcompetenciesreliabilityandvalidityofthequestionnaire
AT forsterjohannes developmentofaquestionnairetoassessmedicalcompetenciesreliabilityandvalidityofthequestionnaire
AT billersilke developmentofaquestionnairetoassessmedicalcompetenciesreliabilityandvalidityofthequestionnaire
AT fabrygotz developmentofaquestionnairetoassessmedicalcompetenciesreliabilityandvalidityofthequestionnaire