Cargando…
The Questionnaire "SFDP26-German": a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching?
Aims: Evaluation of the effectiveness of clinical teaching is an important contribution for the quality control of medical teaching. This should be evaluated using a reliable instrument in order to be able to both gauge the status quo and the effects of instruction. In the Stanford Faculty Developme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000742 |
_version_ | 1782209452671238144 |
---|---|
author | Iblher, Peter Zupanic, Michaela Härtel, Christoph Heinze, Hermann Schmucker, Peter Fischer, Martin R. |
author_facet | Iblher, Peter Zupanic, Michaela Härtel, Christoph Heinze, Hermann Schmucker, Peter Fischer, Martin R. |
author_sort | Iblher, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aims: Evaluation of the effectiveness of clinical teaching is an important contribution for the quality control of medical teaching. This should be evaluated using a reliable instrument in order to be able to both gauge the status quo and the effects of instruction. In the Stanford Faculty Development Program (SFDP), seven categories have proven to be appropriate: 1. Establishing the Learning Climate, . 2. Controlling a Teaching Session, . 3. Communication of Goals, . 4. Encouraging Understanding and Retention, . 5. Evaluation, . 6. Feedback and 7. Self-directed Learning. . Since 1998, the SFDP26 questionnaire has established itself as an evaluation tool in English speaking countries. To date there is no equivalent German-language questionnaire available which evaluates the overall effectiveness of teaching. Question: 1. Development and theoretical testing of a German-language version of SFDP26 (SFDP26-German), 2. Check the correlation of subscale of SFDPGerman against overall effectiveness of teaching. Methods: 19 anaesthetists (7 female, 12 male) from the University of Lübeck were evaluated at the end of a teaching seminar on emergency medical care using SFDP-German. The sample consisted of 173 medical students (119 female (68.8%) and 54 male (31.2%), mostly from the fifth semester (6.6%) and sixth semester (80.3%). The mean age of the students was 23±3 years. Results: The discriminatory power of all items ranged between good and excellent (r(it)=0.48-0.75). All subscales displayed good internal consistency (α=0.69-0.92) and significant positive inter-scale correlations (r=0.40-0.70). The subscales and “overall effectiveness of teaching” showed significant correlation, with the highest correlation for the subscale “communication of goals (p< 0.001; r = 0.61). Conclusion: The analysis of SFDP26-German confirms high internal consistency. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of the individual categories on the overall effectiveness of teaching and validate according to external criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3149471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31494712011-08-04 The Questionnaire "SFDP26-German": a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching? Iblher, Peter Zupanic, Michaela Härtel, Christoph Heinze, Hermann Schmucker, Peter Fischer, Martin R. GMS Z Med Ausbild Article Aims: Evaluation of the effectiveness of clinical teaching is an important contribution for the quality control of medical teaching. This should be evaluated using a reliable instrument in order to be able to both gauge the status quo and the effects of instruction. In the Stanford Faculty Development Program (SFDP), seven categories have proven to be appropriate: 1. Establishing the Learning Climate, . 2. Controlling a Teaching Session, . 3. Communication of Goals, . 4. Encouraging Understanding and Retention, . 5. Evaluation, . 6. Feedback and 7. Self-directed Learning. . Since 1998, the SFDP26 questionnaire has established itself as an evaluation tool in English speaking countries. To date there is no equivalent German-language questionnaire available which evaluates the overall effectiveness of teaching. Question: 1. Development and theoretical testing of a German-language version of SFDP26 (SFDP26-German), 2. Check the correlation of subscale of SFDPGerman against overall effectiveness of teaching. Methods: 19 anaesthetists (7 female, 12 male) from the University of Lübeck were evaluated at the end of a teaching seminar on emergency medical care using SFDP-German. The sample consisted of 173 medical students (119 female (68.8%) and 54 male (31.2%), mostly from the fifth semester (6.6%) and sixth semester (80.3%). The mean age of the students was 23±3 years. Results: The discriminatory power of all items ranged between good and excellent (r(it)=0.48-0.75). All subscales displayed good internal consistency (α=0.69-0.92) and significant positive inter-scale correlations (r=0.40-0.70). The subscales and “overall effectiveness of teaching” showed significant correlation, with the highest correlation for the subscale “communication of goals (p< 0.001; r = 0.61). Conclusion: The analysis of SFDP26-German confirms high internal consistency. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of the individual categories on the overall effectiveness of teaching and validate according to external criteria. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2011-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3149471/ /pubmed/21818240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000742 Text en Copyright © 2011 Iblher et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Iblher, Peter Zupanic, Michaela Härtel, Christoph Heinze, Hermann Schmucker, Peter Fischer, Martin R. The Questionnaire "SFDP26-German": a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching? |
title | The Questionnaire "SFDP26-German": a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching? |
title_full | The Questionnaire "SFDP26-German": a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching? |
title_fullStr | The Questionnaire "SFDP26-German": a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Questionnaire "SFDP26-German": a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching? |
title_short | The Questionnaire "SFDP26-German": a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching? |
title_sort | questionnaire "sfdp26-german": a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iblherpeter thequestionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching AT zupanicmichaela thequestionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching AT hartelchristoph thequestionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching AT heinzehermann thequestionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching AT schmuckerpeter thequestionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching AT fischermartinr thequestionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching AT iblherpeter questionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching AT zupanicmichaela questionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching AT hartelchristoph questionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching AT heinzehermann questionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching AT schmuckerpeter questionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching AT fischermartinr questionnairesfdp26germanareliabletoolforevaluationofclinicalteaching |