Cargando…

A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast

The transcriptome and proteome change dynamically as cells respond to environmental stress; however, prior proteomic studies reported poor correlation between mRNA and protein, rendering their relationships unclear. To address this, we combined high mass accuracy mass spectrometry with isobaric tagg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, M Violet, Topper, Scott E, Hubler, Shane L, Hose, James, Wenger, Craig D, Coon, Joshua J, Gasch, Audrey P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Molecular Biology Organization 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21772262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.48
_version_ 1782210504286011392
author Lee, M Violet
Topper, Scott E
Hubler, Shane L
Hose, James
Wenger, Craig D
Coon, Joshua J
Gasch, Audrey P
author_facet Lee, M Violet
Topper, Scott E
Hubler, Shane L
Hose, James
Wenger, Craig D
Coon, Joshua J
Gasch, Audrey P
author_sort Lee, M Violet
collection PubMed
description The transcriptome and proteome change dynamically as cells respond to environmental stress; however, prior proteomic studies reported poor correlation between mRNA and protein, rendering their relationships unclear. To address this, we combined high mass accuracy mass spectrometry with isobaric tagging to quantify dynamic changes in ∼2500 Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins, in biological triplicate and with paired mRNA samples, as cells acclimated to high osmolarity. Surprisingly, while transcript induction correlated extremely well with protein increase, transcript reduction produced little to no change in the corresponding proteins. We constructed a mathematical model of dynamic protein changes and propose that the lack of protein reduction is explained by cell-division arrest, while transcript reduction supports redistribution of translational machinery. Furthermore, the transient ‘burst’ of mRNA induction after stress serves to accelerate change in the corresponding protein levels. We identified several classes of post-transcriptional regulation, but show that most of the variance in protein changes is explained by mRNA. Our results present a picture of the coordinated physiological responses at the levels of mRNA, protein, protein-synthetic capacity, and cellular growth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3159980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher European Molecular Biology Organization
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31599802011-08-24 A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast Lee, M Violet Topper, Scott E Hubler, Shane L Hose, James Wenger, Craig D Coon, Joshua J Gasch, Audrey P Mol Syst Biol Article The transcriptome and proteome change dynamically as cells respond to environmental stress; however, prior proteomic studies reported poor correlation between mRNA and protein, rendering their relationships unclear. To address this, we combined high mass accuracy mass spectrometry with isobaric tagging to quantify dynamic changes in ∼2500 Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins, in biological triplicate and with paired mRNA samples, as cells acclimated to high osmolarity. Surprisingly, while transcript induction correlated extremely well with protein increase, transcript reduction produced little to no change in the corresponding proteins. We constructed a mathematical model of dynamic protein changes and propose that the lack of protein reduction is explained by cell-division arrest, while transcript reduction supports redistribution of translational machinery. Furthermore, the transient ‘burst’ of mRNA induction after stress serves to accelerate change in the corresponding protein levels. We identified several classes of post-transcriptional regulation, but show that most of the variance in protein changes is explained by mRNA. Our results present a picture of the coordinated physiological responses at the levels of mRNA, protein, protein-synthetic capacity, and cellular growth. European Molecular Biology Organization 2011-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3159980/ /pubmed/21772262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.48 Text en Copyright © 2011, EMBO and Macmillan Publishers Limited https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.
spellingShingle Article
Lee, M Violet
Topper, Scott E
Hubler, Shane L
Hose, James
Wenger, Craig D
Coon, Joshua J
Gasch, Audrey P
A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast
title A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast
title_full A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast
title_fullStr A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast
title_full_unstemmed A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast
title_short A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast
title_sort dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21772262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.48
work_keys_str_mv AT leemviolet adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT topperscotte adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT hublershanel adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT hosejames adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT wengercraigd adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT coonjoshuaj adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT gaschaudreyp adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT leemviolet dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT topperscotte dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT hublershanel dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT hosejames dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT wengercraigd dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT coonjoshuaj dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast
AT gaschaudreyp dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast