Cargando…
A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast
The transcriptome and proteome change dynamically as cells respond to environmental stress; however, prior proteomic studies reported poor correlation between mRNA and protein, rendering their relationships unclear. To address this, we combined high mass accuracy mass spectrometry with isobaric tagg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Molecular Biology Organization
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21772262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.48 |
_version_ | 1782210504286011392 |
---|---|
author | Lee, M Violet Topper, Scott E Hubler, Shane L Hose, James Wenger, Craig D Coon, Joshua J Gasch, Audrey P |
author_facet | Lee, M Violet Topper, Scott E Hubler, Shane L Hose, James Wenger, Craig D Coon, Joshua J Gasch, Audrey P |
author_sort | Lee, M Violet |
collection | PubMed |
description | The transcriptome and proteome change dynamically as cells respond to environmental stress; however, prior proteomic studies reported poor correlation between mRNA and protein, rendering their relationships unclear. To address this, we combined high mass accuracy mass spectrometry with isobaric tagging to quantify dynamic changes in ∼2500 Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins, in biological triplicate and with paired mRNA samples, as cells acclimated to high osmolarity. Surprisingly, while transcript induction correlated extremely well with protein increase, transcript reduction produced little to no change in the corresponding proteins. We constructed a mathematical model of dynamic protein changes and propose that the lack of protein reduction is explained by cell-division arrest, while transcript reduction supports redistribution of translational machinery. Furthermore, the transient ‘burst’ of mRNA induction after stress serves to accelerate change in the corresponding protein levels. We identified several classes of post-transcriptional regulation, but show that most of the variance in protein changes is explained by mRNA. Our results present a picture of the coordinated physiological responses at the levels of mRNA, protein, protein-synthetic capacity, and cellular growth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3159980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | European Molecular Biology Organization |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31599802011-08-24 A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast Lee, M Violet Topper, Scott E Hubler, Shane L Hose, James Wenger, Craig D Coon, Joshua J Gasch, Audrey P Mol Syst Biol Article The transcriptome and proteome change dynamically as cells respond to environmental stress; however, prior proteomic studies reported poor correlation between mRNA and protein, rendering their relationships unclear. To address this, we combined high mass accuracy mass spectrometry with isobaric tagging to quantify dynamic changes in ∼2500 Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins, in biological triplicate and with paired mRNA samples, as cells acclimated to high osmolarity. Surprisingly, while transcript induction correlated extremely well with protein increase, transcript reduction produced little to no change in the corresponding proteins. We constructed a mathematical model of dynamic protein changes and propose that the lack of protein reduction is explained by cell-division arrest, while transcript reduction supports redistribution of translational machinery. Furthermore, the transient ‘burst’ of mRNA induction after stress serves to accelerate change in the corresponding protein levels. We identified several classes of post-transcriptional regulation, but show that most of the variance in protein changes is explained by mRNA. Our results present a picture of the coordinated physiological responses at the levels of mRNA, protein, protein-synthetic capacity, and cellular growth. European Molecular Biology Organization 2011-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3159980/ /pubmed/21772262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.48 Text en Copyright © 2011, EMBO and Macmillan Publishers Limited https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission. |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, M Violet Topper, Scott E Hubler, Shane L Hose, James Wenger, Craig D Coon, Joshua J Gasch, Audrey P A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast |
title | A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast |
title_full | A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast |
title_fullStr | A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast |
title_full_unstemmed | A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast |
title_short | A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast |
title_sort | dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21772262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.48 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leemviolet adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT topperscotte adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT hublershanel adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT hosejames adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT wengercraigd adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT coonjoshuaj adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT gaschaudreyp adynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT leemviolet dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT topperscotte dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT hublershanel dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT hosejames dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT wengercraigd dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT coonjoshuaj dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast AT gaschaudreyp dynamicmodelofproteomechangesrevealsnewrolesfortranscriptalterationinyeast |