Cargando…
Flying in a flock comes at a cost in pigeons
Flying birds often form flocks, with social(1), navigational(2) and anti-predator(3) implications. Further, flying in a flock can result in aerodynamic benefits, thus reducing power requirements(4), as demonstrated by a reduction in heart rate and wingbeat frequency in pelicans flying in a V-formati...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21697946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10164 |
Sumario: | Flying birds often form flocks, with social(1), navigational(2) and anti-predator(3) implications. Further, flying in a flock can result in aerodynamic benefits, thus reducing power requirements(4), as demonstrated by a reduction in heart rate and wingbeat frequency in pelicans flying in a V-formation(5). But how general is an aerodynamic power reduction due to group-flight? V-formation flocks are limited to moderately steady flight in relatively large birds, and may represent a special case. What are the aerodynamic consequences of flying in the more usual ‘cluster’ (6,7) flock? Here, we use data from innovative back-mounted GPS and 6 degree of freedom inertial sensors to show that pigeons 1) maintain powered, banked turns like aircraft, imposing dorsal accelerations of up to 2g, effectively doubling body weight and quadrupling induced power requirements; 2) increase flap frequency with increases in all conventional aerodynamic power requirements; and 3) increase flap frequency when flying near, particularly behind, other birds. Therefore, unlike V-formation pelicans, pigeons do not gain an aerodynamic advantage from flying in a flock; indeed, the increased flap frequency – whether due to direct aerodynamic interactions or requirements for increased stability or control – suggests a considerable energetic cost to flight in a tight cluster flock. |
---|