Cargando…

Decline of influenza-specific CD8(+ )T cell repertoire in healthy geriatric donors

BACKGROUND: While influenza vaccination results in protective antibodies against primary infections, clearance of infection is primarily mediated through CD8(+ )T cells. Studying the CD8(+ )T cell response to influenza epitopes is crucial in understanding the disease associated morbidity and mortali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jessica B, Oelke, Mathias, Ramachandra, Lakshmi, Canaday, David H, Schneck, Jonathan P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21846352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4933-8-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: While influenza vaccination results in protective antibodies against primary infections, clearance of infection is primarily mediated through CD8(+ )T cells. Studying the CD8(+ )T cell response to influenza epitopes is crucial in understanding the disease associated morbidity and mortality especially in at risk populations such as the elderly. We compared the CD8(+ )T cell response to immunodominant and subdominant influenza epitopes in HLA-A2(+ )control, adult donors, aged 21-42, and in geriatric donors, aged 65 and older. RESULTS: We used a novel artificial Antigen Presenting Cell (aAPC) based stimulation assay to reveal responses that could not be detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot). 14 younger control donors and 12 geriatric donors were enrolled in this study. The mean number of influenza-specific subdominant epitopes per control donor detected by ELISpot was only 1.4 while the mean detected by aAPC assay was 3.3 (p = 0.0096). Using the aAPC assay, 92% of the control donors responded to at least one subdominant epitopes, while 71% of control donors responded to more than one subdominant influenza-specific response. 66% of geriatric donors lacked a subdominant influenza-specific response and 33% of geriatric donors responded to only 1 subdominant epitope. The difference in subdominant response between age groups is statistically significant (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: Geriatric donors lacked the broad, multi-specific response to subdominant epitopes seen in the control donors. Thus, we conclude that aging leads to a decrease in the subdominant influenza-specific CTL responses which may contribute to the increased morbidity and mortality in older individuals.