Cargando…

Action-effect binding by observational learning

The acquisition of bidirectional action–effect associations plays a central role in the ability to intentionally control actions. Humans learn about actions not only through active experience, but also through observing the actions of others. In Experiment 1, we examined whether action–effect associ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paulus, Markus, van Dam, Wessel, Hunnius, Sabine, Lindemann, Oliver, Bekkering, Harold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21779944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0136-3
_version_ 1782212536218681344
author Paulus, Markus
van Dam, Wessel
Hunnius, Sabine
Lindemann, Oliver
Bekkering, Harold
author_facet Paulus, Markus
van Dam, Wessel
Hunnius, Sabine
Lindemann, Oliver
Bekkering, Harold
author_sort Paulus, Markus
collection PubMed
description The acquisition of bidirectional action–effect associations plays a central role in the ability to intentionally control actions. Humans learn about actions not only through active experience, but also through observing the actions of others. In Experiment 1, we examined whether action–effect associations can be acquired by observational learning. To this end, participants observed how a model repeatedly pressed two buttons during an observation phase. Each of the buttonpresses led to a specific tone (action effect). In a subsequent test phase, the tones served as target stimuli to which the participants had to respond with buttonpresses. Reaction times were shorter if the stimulus–response mapping in the test phase was compatible with the action–effect association in the observation phase. Experiment 2 excluded the possibility that the impact of perceived action effects on own actions was driven merely by an association of spatial features with the particular tones. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the presence of an agent is necessary to acquire novel action–effect associations through observation. Altogether, the study provides evidence for the claim that bidirectional action–effect associations can be acquired by observational learning. Our findings are discussed in the context of the idea that the acquisition of action–effect associations through observation is an important cognitive mechanism subserving the human ability for social learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3179589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31795892011-09-30 Action-effect binding by observational learning Paulus, Markus van Dam, Wessel Hunnius, Sabine Lindemann, Oliver Bekkering, Harold Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report The acquisition of bidirectional action–effect associations plays a central role in the ability to intentionally control actions. Humans learn about actions not only through active experience, but also through observing the actions of others. In Experiment 1, we examined whether action–effect associations can be acquired by observational learning. To this end, participants observed how a model repeatedly pressed two buttons during an observation phase. Each of the buttonpresses led to a specific tone (action effect). In a subsequent test phase, the tones served as target stimuli to which the participants had to respond with buttonpresses. Reaction times were shorter if the stimulus–response mapping in the test phase was compatible with the action–effect association in the observation phase. Experiment 2 excluded the possibility that the impact of perceived action effects on own actions was driven merely by an association of spatial features with the particular tones. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the presence of an agent is necessary to acquire novel action–effect associations through observation. Altogether, the study provides evidence for the claim that bidirectional action–effect associations can be acquired by observational learning. Our findings are discussed in the context of the idea that the acquisition of action–effect associations through observation is an important cognitive mechanism subserving the human ability for social learning. Springer-Verlag 2011-07-21 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3179589/ /pubmed/21779944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0136-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Paulus, Markus
van Dam, Wessel
Hunnius, Sabine
Lindemann, Oliver
Bekkering, Harold
Action-effect binding by observational learning
title Action-effect binding by observational learning
title_full Action-effect binding by observational learning
title_fullStr Action-effect binding by observational learning
title_full_unstemmed Action-effect binding by observational learning
title_short Action-effect binding by observational learning
title_sort action-effect binding by observational learning
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21779944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0136-3
work_keys_str_mv AT paulusmarkus actioneffectbindingbyobservationallearning
AT vandamwessel actioneffectbindingbyobservationallearning
AT hunniussabine actioneffectbindingbyobservationallearning
AT lindemannoliver actioneffectbindingbyobservationallearning
AT bekkeringharold actioneffectbindingbyobservationallearning