Cargando…

False negative results from using common PCR reagents

BACKGROUND: The sensitivity of the PCR reaction makes it ideal for use when identifying potentially novel viral infections in human disease. Unfortunately, this same sensitivity also leaves this popular technique open to potential contamination with previously amplified PCR products, or "carry-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bacich, Dean J, Sobek, Kathryn M, Cummings, Jessica L, Atwood, Allison A, O'Keefe, Denise S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22032271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-457
_version_ 1782216879870312448
author Bacich, Dean J
Sobek, Kathryn M
Cummings, Jessica L
Atwood, Allison A
O'Keefe, Denise S
author_facet Bacich, Dean J
Sobek, Kathryn M
Cummings, Jessica L
Atwood, Allison A
O'Keefe, Denise S
author_sort Bacich, Dean J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The sensitivity of the PCR reaction makes it ideal for use when identifying potentially novel viral infections in human disease. Unfortunately, this same sensitivity also leaves this popular technique open to potential contamination with previously amplified PCR products, or "carry-over" contamination. PCR product carry-over contamination can be prevented with uracil-DNA-glycosylase (UNG), and it is for this reason that it is commonly included in many commercial PCR master-mixes. While testing the sensitivity of PCR assays to detect murine DNA contamination in human tissue samples, we inadvertently discovered that the use of this common PCR reagent may lead to the production of false-negative PCR results. FINDINGS: We show here that contamination with minute quantities of UNG-digested PCR product or any negative control PCR reactions containing primer-dimers regardless of UNG presence can completely block amplification from as much as 60 ng of legitimate target DNA. CONCLUSIONS: These findings could potentially explain discrepant results from laboratories attempting to amplify MLV-related viruses including XMRV from human samples, as none of the published reports used internal-tube controls for amplification. The potential for false negative results needs to be considered and carefully controlled in PCR experiments, especially when the target copy number may be low - just as the potential for false positive results already is.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3219698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32196982011-11-18 False negative results from using common PCR reagents Bacich, Dean J Sobek, Kathryn M Cummings, Jessica L Atwood, Allison A O'Keefe, Denise S BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: The sensitivity of the PCR reaction makes it ideal for use when identifying potentially novel viral infections in human disease. Unfortunately, this same sensitivity also leaves this popular technique open to potential contamination with previously amplified PCR products, or "carry-over" contamination. PCR product carry-over contamination can be prevented with uracil-DNA-glycosylase (UNG), and it is for this reason that it is commonly included in many commercial PCR master-mixes. While testing the sensitivity of PCR assays to detect murine DNA contamination in human tissue samples, we inadvertently discovered that the use of this common PCR reagent may lead to the production of false-negative PCR results. FINDINGS: We show here that contamination with minute quantities of UNG-digested PCR product or any negative control PCR reactions containing primer-dimers regardless of UNG presence can completely block amplification from as much as 60 ng of legitimate target DNA. CONCLUSIONS: These findings could potentially explain discrepant results from laboratories attempting to amplify MLV-related viruses including XMRV from human samples, as none of the published reports used internal-tube controls for amplification. The potential for false negative results needs to be considered and carefully controlled in PCR experiments, especially when the target copy number may be low - just as the potential for false positive results already is. BioMed Central 2011-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3219698/ /pubmed/22032271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-457 Text en Copyright ©2011 O'Keefe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Bacich, Dean J
Sobek, Kathryn M
Cummings, Jessica L
Atwood, Allison A
O'Keefe, Denise S
False negative results from using common PCR reagents
title False negative results from using common PCR reagents
title_full False negative results from using common PCR reagents
title_fullStr False negative results from using common PCR reagents
title_full_unstemmed False negative results from using common PCR reagents
title_short False negative results from using common PCR reagents
title_sort false negative results from using common pcr reagents
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3219698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22032271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-457
work_keys_str_mv AT bacichdeanj falsenegativeresultsfromusingcommonpcrreagents
AT sobekkathrynm falsenegativeresultsfromusingcommonpcrreagents
AT cummingsjessical falsenegativeresultsfromusingcommonpcrreagents
AT atwoodallisona falsenegativeresultsfromusingcommonpcrreagents
AT okeefedenises falsenegativeresultsfromusingcommonpcrreagents