Cargando…
Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development
In quite a few diseases, drug resistance due to target variability poses a serious problem in pharmacotherapy. This is certainly true for HIV, and hence, it is often unknown which drug is best to use or to develop against an individual HIV strain. In this work we applied ‘proteochemometric’ modeling...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3223189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22132107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027518 |
_version_ | 1782217267461750784 |
---|---|
author | van Westen, Gerard J. P. Wegner, Jörg K. Geluykens, Peggy Kwanten, Leen Vereycken, Inge Peeters, Anik IJzerman, Adriaan P. van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. Bender, Andreas |
author_facet | van Westen, Gerard J. P. Wegner, Jörg K. Geluykens, Peggy Kwanten, Leen Vereycken, Inge Peeters, Anik IJzerman, Adriaan P. van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. Bender, Andreas |
author_sort | van Westen, Gerard J. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In quite a few diseases, drug resistance due to target variability poses a serious problem in pharmacotherapy. This is certainly true for HIV, and hence, it is often unknown which drug is best to use or to develop against an individual HIV strain. In this work we applied ‘proteochemometric’ modeling of HIV Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase (NNRTI) inhibitors to support preclinical development by predicting compound performance on multiple mutants in the lead selection stage. Proteochemometric models are based on both small molecule and target properties and can thus capture multi-target activity relationships simultaneously, the targets in this case being a set of 14 HIV Reverse Transcriptase (RT) mutants. We validated our model by experimentally confirming model predictions for 317 untested compound – mutant pairs, with a prediction error comparable with assay variability (RMSE 0.62). Furthermore, dependent on the similarity of a new mutant to the training set, we could predict with high accuracy which compound will be most effective on a sequence with a previously unknown genotype. Hence, our models allow the evaluation of compound performance on untested sequences and the selection of the most promising leads for further preclinical research. The modeling concept is likely to be applicable also to other target families with genetic variability like other viruses or bacteria, or with similar orthologs like GPCRs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3223189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32231892011-11-30 Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development van Westen, Gerard J. P. Wegner, Jörg K. Geluykens, Peggy Kwanten, Leen Vereycken, Inge Peeters, Anik IJzerman, Adriaan P. van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. Bender, Andreas PLoS One Research Article In quite a few diseases, drug resistance due to target variability poses a serious problem in pharmacotherapy. This is certainly true for HIV, and hence, it is often unknown which drug is best to use or to develop against an individual HIV strain. In this work we applied ‘proteochemometric’ modeling of HIV Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase (NNRTI) inhibitors to support preclinical development by predicting compound performance on multiple mutants in the lead selection stage. Proteochemometric models are based on both small molecule and target properties and can thus capture multi-target activity relationships simultaneously, the targets in this case being a set of 14 HIV Reverse Transcriptase (RT) mutants. We validated our model by experimentally confirming model predictions for 317 untested compound – mutant pairs, with a prediction error comparable with assay variability (RMSE 0.62). Furthermore, dependent on the similarity of a new mutant to the training set, we could predict with high accuracy which compound will be most effective on a sequence with a previously unknown genotype. Hence, our models allow the evaluation of compound performance on untested sequences and the selection of the most promising leads for further preclinical research. The modeling concept is likely to be applicable also to other target families with genetic variability like other viruses or bacteria, or with similar orthologs like GPCRs. Public Library of Science 2011-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3223189/ /pubmed/22132107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027518 Text en van Westen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Westen, Gerard J. P. Wegner, Jörg K. Geluykens, Peggy Kwanten, Leen Vereycken, Inge Peeters, Anik IJzerman, Adriaan P. van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. Bender, Andreas Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development |
title | Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development |
title_full | Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development |
title_fullStr | Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development |
title_full_unstemmed | Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development |
title_short | Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development |
title_sort | which compound to select in lead optimization? prospectively validated proteochemometric models guide preclinical development |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3223189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22132107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanwestengerardjp whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment AT wegnerjorgk whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment AT geluykenspeggy whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment AT kwantenleen whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment AT vereyckeninge whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment AT peetersanik whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment AT ijzermanadriaanp whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment AT vanvlijmenhermanwt whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment AT benderandreas whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment |