Cargando…

Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development

In quite a few diseases, drug resistance due to target variability poses a serious problem in pharmacotherapy. This is certainly true for HIV, and hence, it is often unknown which drug is best to use or to develop against an individual HIV strain. In this work we applied ‘proteochemometric’ modeling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Westen, Gerard J. P., Wegner, Jörg K., Geluykens, Peggy, Kwanten, Leen, Vereycken, Inge, Peeters, Anik, IJzerman, Adriaan P., van Vlijmen, Herman W. T., Bender, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3223189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22132107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027518
_version_ 1782217267461750784
author van Westen, Gerard J. P.
Wegner, Jörg K.
Geluykens, Peggy
Kwanten, Leen
Vereycken, Inge
Peeters, Anik
IJzerman, Adriaan P.
van Vlijmen, Herman W. T.
Bender, Andreas
author_facet van Westen, Gerard J. P.
Wegner, Jörg K.
Geluykens, Peggy
Kwanten, Leen
Vereycken, Inge
Peeters, Anik
IJzerman, Adriaan P.
van Vlijmen, Herman W. T.
Bender, Andreas
author_sort van Westen, Gerard J. P.
collection PubMed
description In quite a few diseases, drug resistance due to target variability poses a serious problem in pharmacotherapy. This is certainly true for HIV, and hence, it is often unknown which drug is best to use or to develop against an individual HIV strain. In this work we applied ‘proteochemometric’ modeling of HIV Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase (NNRTI) inhibitors to support preclinical development by predicting compound performance on multiple mutants in the lead selection stage. Proteochemometric models are based on both small molecule and target properties and can thus capture multi-target activity relationships simultaneously, the targets in this case being a set of 14 HIV Reverse Transcriptase (RT) mutants. We validated our model by experimentally confirming model predictions for 317 untested compound – mutant pairs, with a prediction error comparable with assay variability (RMSE 0.62). Furthermore, dependent on the similarity of a new mutant to the training set, we could predict with high accuracy which compound will be most effective on a sequence with a previously unknown genotype. Hence, our models allow the evaluation of compound performance on untested sequences and the selection of the most promising leads for further preclinical research. The modeling concept is likely to be applicable also to other target families with genetic variability like other viruses or bacteria, or with similar orthologs like GPCRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3223189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32231892011-11-30 Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development van Westen, Gerard J. P. Wegner, Jörg K. Geluykens, Peggy Kwanten, Leen Vereycken, Inge Peeters, Anik IJzerman, Adriaan P. van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. Bender, Andreas PLoS One Research Article In quite a few diseases, drug resistance due to target variability poses a serious problem in pharmacotherapy. This is certainly true for HIV, and hence, it is often unknown which drug is best to use or to develop against an individual HIV strain. In this work we applied ‘proteochemometric’ modeling of HIV Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase (NNRTI) inhibitors to support preclinical development by predicting compound performance on multiple mutants in the lead selection stage. Proteochemometric models are based on both small molecule and target properties and can thus capture multi-target activity relationships simultaneously, the targets in this case being a set of 14 HIV Reverse Transcriptase (RT) mutants. We validated our model by experimentally confirming model predictions for 317 untested compound – mutant pairs, with a prediction error comparable with assay variability (RMSE 0.62). Furthermore, dependent on the similarity of a new mutant to the training set, we could predict with high accuracy which compound will be most effective on a sequence with a previously unknown genotype. Hence, our models allow the evaluation of compound performance on untested sequences and the selection of the most promising leads for further preclinical research. The modeling concept is likely to be applicable also to other target families with genetic variability like other viruses or bacteria, or with similar orthologs like GPCRs. Public Library of Science 2011-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3223189/ /pubmed/22132107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027518 Text en van Westen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Westen, Gerard J. P.
Wegner, Jörg K.
Geluykens, Peggy
Kwanten, Leen
Vereycken, Inge
Peeters, Anik
IJzerman, Adriaan P.
van Vlijmen, Herman W. T.
Bender, Andreas
Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development
title Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development
title_full Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development
title_fullStr Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development
title_full_unstemmed Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development
title_short Which Compound to Select in Lead Optimization? Prospectively Validated Proteochemometric Models Guide Preclinical Development
title_sort which compound to select in lead optimization? prospectively validated proteochemometric models guide preclinical development
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3223189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22132107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027518
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwestengerardjp whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment
AT wegnerjorgk whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment
AT geluykenspeggy whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment
AT kwantenleen whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment
AT vereyckeninge whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment
AT peetersanik whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment
AT ijzermanadriaanp whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment
AT vanvlijmenhermanwt whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment
AT benderandreas whichcompoundtoselectinleadoptimizationprospectivelyvalidatedproteochemometricmodelsguidepreclinicaldevelopment