Cargando…

QTc prolongation assessment in anticancer drug development: clinical and methodological issues

Cardiac safety assessments are commonly employed in the clinical development of investigational oncology medications. In anti-cancer drug development there has been increasing consideration for the potential of a compound to cause adverse electrocardiographic changes, especially QT interval prolonga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curigliano, G, Spitaleri, G, de Braud, F, Cardinale, D, Cipolla, C, Civelli, M, Colombo, N, Colombo, A, Locatelli, M, Goldhirsch, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3223992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22275999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2009.130
_version_ 1782217329880334336
author Curigliano, G
Spitaleri, G
de Braud, F
Cardinale, D
Cipolla, C
Civelli, M
Colombo, N
Colombo, A
Locatelli, M
Goldhirsch, A
author_facet Curigliano, G
Spitaleri, G
de Braud, F
Cardinale, D
Cipolla, C
Civelli, M
Colombo, N
Colombo, A
Locatelli, M
Goldhirsch, A
author_sort Curigliano, G
collection PubMed
description Cardiac safety assessments are commonly employed in the clinical development of investigational oncology medications. In anti-cancer drug development there has been increasing consideration for the potential of a compound to cause adverse electrocardiographic changes, especially QT interval prolongation, which can be associated with risk of torsades de pointes and sudden death. Irrespective of overt clinical toxicities, QTc assessment can potentially influence decision making at many levels during the conduct of clinical studies, including eligibility for protocol therapy, dose delivery or discontinuation, and analyses of optimal dose for subsequent development. Given the potential for serious and irreversible morbidity from cardiac adverse events, it is understandable that cardiac safety results can have broad impact on study conduct and patient management. The methodologies for risk management of QTc prolongation for non cardiac drugs have been developed out of experiences primarily from drugs used to treat non life-threatening illnesses in a chronic setting such as antibiotics or antihistamines. Extrapolating these approaches to drugs for treating cancer over an acute period may not be appropriate. Few specific guidelines are available for risk management of cardiac safety in the development and use of oncology drugs. In this manuscript, clinical and methodological issues related to QTc prolongation assessment will be reviewed. Discussions about limitations in phase-I design and oncology drug development will be highlighted. Efforts are needed to refine strategies for risk management, avoiding unintended consequences that negatively affect patient access and clinical development of promising new cancer treatments. A thoughtful risk management plan generated by an organized collaboration between oncologists, cardiologists, and regulatory agencies to support a development programme essential for oncology agents with cardiac safety concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3223992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32239922012-01-24 QTc prolongation assessment in anticancer drug development: clinical and methodological issues Curigliano, G Spitaleri, G de Braud, F Cardinale, D Cipolla, C Civelli, M Colombo, N Colombo, A Locatelli, M Goldhirsch, A Ecancermedicalscience Reviews Cardiac safety assessments are commonly employed in the clinical development of investigational oncology medications. In anti-cancer drug development there has been increasing consideration for the potential of a compound to cause adverse electrocardiographic changes, especially QT interval prolongation, which can be associated with risk of torsades de pointes and sudden death. Irrespective of overt clinical toxicities, QTc assessment can potentially influence decision making at many levels during the conduct of clinical studies, including eligibility for protocol therapy, dose delivery or discontinuation, and analyses of optimal dose for subsequent development. Given the potential for serious and irreversible morbidity from cardiac adverse events, it is understandable that cardiac safety results can have broad impact on study conduct and patient management. The methodologies for risk management of QTc prolongation for non cardiac drugs have been developed out of experiences primarily from drugs used to treat non life-threatening illnesses in a chronic setting such as antibiotics or antihistamines. Extrapolating these approaches to drugs for treating cancer over an acute period may not be appropriate. Few specific guidelines are available for risk management of cardiac safety in the development and use of oncology drugs. In this manuscript, clinical and methodological issues related to QTc prolongation assessment will be reviewed. Discussions about limitations in phase-I design and oncology drug development will be highlighted. Efforts are needed to refine strategies for risk management, avoiding unintended consequences that negatively affect patient access and clinical development of promising new cancer treatments. A thoughtful risk management plan generated by an organized collaboration between oncologists, cardiologists, and regulatory agencies to support a development programme essential for oncology agents with cardiac safety concerns. Cancer Intelligence 2009-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3223992/ /pubmed/22275999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2009.130 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Curigliano, G
Spitaleri, G
de Braud, F
Cardinale, D
Cipolla, C
Civelli, M
Colombo, N
Colombo, A
Locatelli, M
Goldhirsch, A
QTc prolongation assessment in anticancer drug development: clinical and methodological issues
title QTc prolongation assessment in anticancer drug development: clinical and methodological issues
title_full QTc prolongation assessment in anticancer drug development: clinical and methodological issues
title_fullStr QTc prolongation assessment in anticancer drug development: clinical and methodological issues
title_full_unstemmed QTc prolongation assessment in anticancer drug development: clinical and methodological issues
title_short QTc prolongation assessment in anticancer drug development: clinical and methodological issues
title_sort qtc prolongation assessment in anticancer drug development: clinical and methodological issues
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3223992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22275999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2009.130
work_keys_str_mv AT curiglianog qtcprolongationassessmentinanticancerdrugdevelopmentclinicalandmethodologicalissues
AT spitalerig qtcprolongationassessmentinanticancerdrugdevelopmentclinicalandmethodologicalissues
AT debraudf qtcprolongationassessmentinanticancerdrugdevelopmentclinicalandmethodologicalissues
AT cardinaled qtcprolongationassessmentinanticancerdrugdevelopmentclinicalandmethodologicalissues
AT cipollac qtcprolongationassessmentinanticancerdrugdevelopmentclinicalandmethodologicalissues
AT civellim qtcprolongationassessmentinanticancerdrugdevelopmentclinicalandmethodologicalissues
AT colombon qtcprolongationassessmentinanticancerdrugdevelopmentclinicalandmethodologicalissues
AT colomboa qtcprolongationassessmentinanticancerdrugdevelopmentclinicalandmethodologicalissues
AT locatellim qtcprolongationassessmentinanticancerdrugdevelopmentclinicalandmethodologicalissues
AT goldhirscha qtcprolongationassessmentinanticancerdrugdevelopmentclinicalandmethodologicalissues