Cargando…

Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement?

Although other web-based approaches to assessment of professional behaviour have been studied, no publications studying the potential advantages of a web-based instrument versus a classic, paper-based method have been published to date. This study has two research goals: it focuses on the quantity a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Mook, Walther N. K. A., Muijtjens, Arno M. M., Gorter, Simone L., Zwaveling, Jan Harm, Schuwirth, Lambert W., van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3274685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21533755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9297-0
_version_ 1782223102860591104
author van Mook, Walther N. K. A.
Muijtjens, Arno M. M.
Gorter, Simone L.
Zwaveling, Jan Harm
Schuwirth, Lambert W.
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
author_facet van Mook, Walther N. K. A.
Muijtjens, Arno M. M.
Gorter, Simone L.
Zwaveling, Jan Harm
Schuwirth, Lambert W.
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
author_sort van Mook, Walther N. K. A.
collection PubMed
description Although other web-based approaches to assessment of professional behaviour have been studied, no publications studying the potential advantages of a web-based instrument versus a classic, paper-based method have been published to date. This study has two research goals: it focuses on the quantity and quality of comments provided by students and their peers (two researchers independently scoring comments as correct and incorrect in relation to five commonly used feedback rules (and resulting in an aggregated score of the five scores) on the one, and on the feasibility, acceptability and perceived usefulness of the two approaches on the other hand (using a survey). The amount of feedback was significantly higher in the web-based group than in the paper based group for all three categories (dealing with work, others and oneself). Regarding the quality of feedback, the aggregated score for each of the three categories was not significantly different between the two groups, neither for the interim, nor for the final assessment. Some, not statistically significant, but nevertheless noteworthy trends were nevertheless noted. Feedback in the web-based group was more often unrelated to observed behaviour for several categories for both the interim and final assessment. Furthermore, most comments relating to the category ‘Dealing with oneself’ consisted of descriptions of a student’s attendance, thereby neglecting other aspects of personal functioning. The survey identified significant differences between the groups for all questionnaire items regarding feasibility, acceptability and perceived usefulness in favour of the paper-based form. The use of a web-based instrument for professional behaviour assessment yielded a significantly higher number of comments compared to the traditional paper-based assessment. Unfortunately, the quality of the feedback obtained by the web-based instrument as measured by several generally accepted feedback criteria did not parallel this increase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3274685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32746852012-02-21 Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement? van Mook, Walther N. K. A. Muijtjens, Arno M. M. Gorter, Simone L. Zwaveling, Jan Harm Schuwirth, Lambert W. van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Article Although other web-based approaches to assessment of professional behaviour have been studied, no publications studying the potential advantages of a web-based instrument versus a classic, paper-based method have been published to date. This study has two research goals: it focuses on the quantity and quality of comments provided by students and their peers (two researchers independently scoring comments as correct and incorrect in relation to five commonly used feedback rules (and resulting in an aggregated score of the five scores) on the one, and on the feasibility, acceptability and perceived usefulness of the two approaches on the other hand (using a survey). The amount of feedback was significantly higher in the web-based group than in the paper based group for all three categories (dealing with work, others and oneself). Regarding the quality of feedback, the aggregated score for each of the three categories was not significantly different between the two groups, neither for the interim, nor for the final assessment. Some, not statistically significant, but nevertheless noteworthy trends were nevertheless noted. Feedback in the web-based group was more often unrelated to observed behaviour for several categories for both the interim and final assessment. Furthermore, most comments relating to the category ‘Dealing with oneself’ consisted of descriptions of a student’s attendance, thereby neglecting other aspects of personal functioning. The survey identified significant differences between the groups for all questionnaire items regarding feasibility, acceptability and perceived usefulness in favour of the paper-based form. The use of a web-based instrument for professional behaviour assessment yielded a significantly higher number of comments compared to the traditional paper-based assessment. Unfortunately, the quality of the feedback obtained by the web-based instrument as measured by several generally accepted feedback criteria did not parallel this increase. Springer Netherlands 2011-05-01 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3274685/ /pubmed/21533755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9297-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
van Mook, Walther N. K. A.
Muijtjens, Arno M. M.
Gorter, Simone L.
Zwaveling, Jan Harm
Schuwirth, Lambert W.
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement?
title Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement?
title_full Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement?
title_fullStr Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement?
title_full_unstemmed Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement?
title_short Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement?
title_sort web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3274685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21533755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9297-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vanmookwalthernka webassistedassessmentofprofessionalbehaviourinproblembasedlearningmorefeedbackyetnoqualitativeimprovement
AT muijtjensarnomm webassistedassessmentofprofessionalbehaviourinproblembasedlearningmorefeedbackyetnoqualitativeimprovement
AT gortersimonel webassistedassessmentofprofessionalbehaviourinproblembasedlearningmorefeedbackyetnoqualitativeimprovement
AT zwavelingjanharm webassistedassessmentofprofessionalbehaviourinproblembasedlearningmorefeedbackyetnoqualitativeimprovement
AT schuwirthlambertw webassistedassessmentofprofessionalbehaviourinproblembasedlearningmorefeedbackyetnoqualitativeimprovement
AT vandervleutenceespm webassistedassessmentofprofessionalbehaviourinproblembasedlearningmorefeedbackyetnoqualitativeimprovement