Cargando…
Evaluation of association tests for rare variants using simulated data sets in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 data
We evaluate four association tests for rare variants—the combined multivariate and collapsing (CMC) method, two weighted-sum methods, and a variable threshold method—by applying them to the simulated data sets of unrelated individuals in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 (GAW17) data. The family-wise...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22373475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S9-S86 |
_version_ | 1782224775419002880 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Wenan Gao, Xi Wang, Jiexun Sun, Chuanyu Wan, Wen Zhi, Degui Liu, Nianjun Chen, Xiangning Gao, Guimin |
author_facet | Chen, Wenan Gao, Xi Wang, Jiexun Sun, Chuanyu Wan, Wen Zhi, Degui Liu, Nianjun Chen, Xiangning Gao, Guimin |
author_sort | Chen, Wenan |
collection | PubMed |
description | We evaluate four association tests for rare variants—the combined multivariate and collapsing (CMC) method, two weighted-sum methods, and a variable threshold method—by applying them to the simulated data sets of unrelated individuals in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 (GAW17) data. The family-wise error rate (FWER) and average power are used as criteria for evaluation. Our results show that when all nonsynonymous SNPs (rare variants and common variants) in a gene are jointly analyzed, the CMC method fails to control the FWER; when only rare variants (single-nucleotide polymorphisms with minor allele frequency less than 0.05) are analyzed, all four methods can control FWER well. All four methods have comparable power, which is low for the analysis of the GAW17 data sets. Three of the methods (not including the CMC method) involve estimation of p-values using permutation procedures that either can be computationally intensive or generate inflated FWERs. We adapt a fast permutation procedure into these three methods. The results show that using the fast permutation procedure can produce FWERs and average powers close to the values obtained from the standard permutation procedure on the GAW17 data sets. The standard permutation procedure is computationally intensive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3287927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32879272012-02-28 Evaluation of association tests for rare variants using simulated data sets in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 data Chen, Wenan Gao, Xi Wang, Jiexun Sun, Chuanyu Wan, Wen Zhi, Degui Liu, Nianjun Chen, Xiangning Gao, Guimin BMC Proc Proceedings We evaluate four association tests for rare variants—the combined multivariate and collapsing (CMC) method, two weighted-sum methods, and a variable threshold method—by applying them to the simulated data sets of unrelated individuals in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 (GAW17) data. The family-wise error rate (FWER) and average power are used as criteria for evaluation. Our results show that when all nonsynonymous SNPs (rare variants and common variants) in a gene are jointly analyzed, the CMC method fails to control the FWER; when only rare variants (single-nucleotide polymorphisms with minor allele frequency less than 0.05) are analyzed, all four methods can control FWER well. All four methods have comparable power, which is low for the analysis of the GAW17 data sets. Three of the methods (not including the CMC method) involve estimation of p-values using permutation procedures that either can be computationally intensive or generate inflated FWERs. We adapt a fast permutation procedure into these three methods. The results show that using the fast permutation procedure can produce FWERs and average powers close to the values obtained from the standard permutation procedure on the GAW17 data sets. The standard permutation procedure is computationally intensive. BioMed Central 2011-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3287927/ /pubmed/22373475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S9-S86 Text en Copyright ©2011 Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Proceedings Chen, Wenan Gao, Xi Wang, Jiexun Sun, Chuanyu Wan, Wen Zhi, Degui Liu, Nianjun Chen, Xiangning Gao, Guimin Evaluation of association tests for rare variants using simulated data sets in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 data |
title | Evaluation of association tests for rare variants using simulated data sets in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 data |
title_full | Evaluation of association tests for rare variants using simulated data sets in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 data |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of association tests for rare variants using simulated data sets in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 data |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of association tests for rare variants using simulated data sets in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 data |
title_short | Evaluation of association tests for rare variants using simulated data sets in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 data |
title_sort | evaluation of association tests for rare variants using simulated data sets in the genetic analysis workshop 17 data |
topic | Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3287927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22373475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S9-S86 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenwenan evaluationofassociationtestsforrarevariantsusingsimulateddatasetsinthegeneticanalysisworkshop17data AT gaoxi evaluationofassociationtestsforrarevariantsusingsimulateddatasetsinthegeneticanalysisworkshop17data AT wangjiexun evaluationofassociationtestsforrarevariantsusingsimulateddatasetsinthegeneticanalysisworkshop17data AT sunchuanyu evaluationofassociationtestsforrarevariantsusingsimulateddatasetsinthegeneticanalysisworkshop17data AT wanwen evaluationofassociationtestsforrarevariantsusingsimulateddatasetsinthegeneticanalysisworkshop17data AT zhidegui evaluationofassociationtestsforrarevariantsusingsimulateddatasetsinthegeneticanalysisworkshop17data AT liunianjun evaluationofassociationtestsforrarevariantsusingsimulateddatasetsinthegeneticanalysisworkshop17data AT chenxiangning evaluationofassociationtestsforrarevariantsusingsimulateddatasetsinthegeneticanalysisworkshop17data AT gaoguimin evaluationofassociationtestsforrarevariantsusingsimulateddatasetsinthegeneticanalysisworkshop17data |